Students' Scientific Group Affiliated to II Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Medical University of Warsaw, 02-091 Warszawa, Poland.
II Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Medical University of Warsaw, 02-091 Warszawa, Poland.
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Jun 23;19(13):7696. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19137696.
Cesarean section rates are constantly rising, and the number of women with a prior cesarean considering a delivery mode for their next labor is increasing. We aimed to compare maternal and neonatal outcomes and feeding method in women undergoing vaginal birth after cesarean (VBAC) versus elective repeat cesarean delivery (ERCD). This was a retrospective cohort study of women with one prior cesarean delivery (CD) and no previous vaginal births, delivering vaginally or by a CD in a single institution between 2016 and 2018. 355 live singleton spontaneous vaginal and cesarean deliveries were included. 121 women delivered vaginally and 234 had a CD. Neonates born by a CD were more likely to have higher birth weight (p < 0.001), higher weight at discharge (p < 0.001), macrosomia (p = 0.030), lose >10% of their body mass (p = 0.001), be mixed-fed (p < 0.001), and be hospitalized longer (p < 0.001). Children born vaginally were more likely to be exclusively breastfed (p < 0.001). Women undergoing VBAC were more likely to deliver preterm (p = 0.006) and post-term (p < 0.001), present with PROM (p < 0.001), have greater PROM latency period (p < 0.001), and experience intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy (p = 0.029), postpartum anemia (p < 0.001), and peripartum blood loss >1 L (p = 0.049). The incidence of anemia during pregnancy was higher in the ERCD cohort (p = 0.047). Women undergoing VBAC are more likely to breastfeed their children, perhaps for the same reason they choose the vaginal method of delivery, as vaginal delivery and breastfeeding along with antibiotic use, are the most important factors decreasing the risk for future diseases in their offspring.
剖宫产率不断上升,越来越多有过剖宫产史的妇女考虑在下一次分娩时选择分娩方式。我们旨在比较阴道分娩后剖宫产(VBAC)与选择性重复剖宫产(ERCD)的母婴结局和喂养方式。这是一项回顾性队列研究,纳入了 2016 年至 2018 年期间在一家机构分娩的、有一次剖宫产史且无阴道分娩史的单胎活产妇女。共纳入 355 例阴道分娩和剖宫产分娩的活产儿。121 例产妇行阴道分娩,234 例行剖宫产。经剖宫产分娩的新生儿体重更高(p<0.001)、出院时体重更高(p<0.001)、巨大儿发生率更高(p=0.030)、体重丢失超过 10%的比例更高(p=0.001)、混合喂养的比例更高(p<0.001)、住院时间更长(p<0.001)。阴道分娩的婴儿更有可能纯母乳喂养(p<0.001)。行 VBAC 的产妇更有可能早产(p=0.006)和过期产(p<0.001)、胎膜早破(p<0.001)、胎膜早破潜伏期更长(p<0.001)、发生妊娠肝内胆汁淤积症(p=0.029)、产后贫血(p<0.001)和围生期失血>1L(p=0.049)的比例更高。ERCD 组妊娠期间贫血的发生率更高(p=0.047)。行 VBAC 的产妇更有可能母乳喂养其婴儿,这也许是因为她们选择阴道分娩的原因相同,因为阴道分娩和母乳喂养以及使用抗生素是降低后代未来疾病风险的最重要因素。