Suppr超能文献

非选择性β受体阻滞剂不会影响肝硬化腹水患者的死亡率:三项随机对照试验的事后分析,共纳入 1198 例患者。

Nonselective β-blockers do not affect mortality in cirrhosis patients with ascites: Post Hoc analysis of three randomized controlled trials with 1198 patients.

机构信息

Department of Hepatology and Gastroenterology, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark.

Department of Clinical Epidemiology, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark.

出版信息

Hepatology. 2016 Jun;63(6):1968-76. doi: 10.1002/hep.28352. Epub 2016 Jan 5.

Abstract

UNLABELLED

The safety of nonselective β-blockers (NSBBs) in advanced cirrhosis has been questioned. We used data from three satavaptan trials to examine whether NSBBs increase mortality in cirrhosis patients with ascites. The trials were conducted in 2006-2008 and included 1198 cirrhosis patients with ascites followed for 1 year. We used Cox regression to compare all-cause mortality and cirrhosis-related mortality between patients who did and those who did not use NSBBs at randomization, controlling for age, gender, Model for End-Stage Liver Disease score, Child-Pugh score, serum sodium, previous variceal bleeding, cirrhosis etiology, and ascites severity. Moreover, we identified clinical events predicting that a patient would stop NSBB treatment. At randomization, the 559 NSBB users were more likely than the 629 nonusers to have a history of variceal bleeding but less likely to have Child-Pugh class C cirrhosis, hyponatremia, or refractory ascites. The 52-week cumulative all-cause mortality was similar in the NSBB user and nonuser groups (23.2% versus 25.3%, adjusted hazard ratio = 0.92, 95% confidence interval 0.72-1.18), and NSBBs also did not increase mortality in the subgroup of patients with refractory ascites (588 patients, adjusted hazard ratio = 1.02, 95% confidence interval 0.74-1.40) or in any other subgroup. Similarly, NSBBs did not increase cirrhosis-related mortality (adjusted hazard ratio = 1.00, 95% confidence interval 0.76-1.31). During follow-up, 29% of initial NSBB users stopped taking NSBBs, and the decision to stop NSBB treatment marked a sharp rise in mortality and coincided with hospitalization, variceal bleeding, bacterial infection, and/or development of hepatorenal syndrome.

CONCLUSION

This large and detailed data set on worldwide nonprotocol use of NSBBs in cirrhosis patients with ascites shows that NSBBs did not increase mortality; the decision to stop NSBB treatment in relation to stressful events may have added to the safety. (Hepatology 2016;63:1968-1976).

摘要

未阐明

非选择性β受体阻滞剂(NSBBs)在晚期肝硬化中的安全性受到质疑。我们使用来自三个沙他伐他汀试验的数据来研究 NSBB 是否会增加肝硬化腹水患者的死亡率。这些试验于 2006 年至 2008 年进行,包括 1198 名肝硬化腹水患者,随访 1 年。我们使用 Cox 回归比较随机分组时使用和不使用 NSBB 的患者的全因死亡率和肝硬化相关死亡率,同时控制年龄、性别、终末期肝病模型评分、Child-Pugh 评分、血清钠、既往静脉曲张出血、肝硬化病因和腹水严重程度。此外,我们确定了预测患者停止 NSBB 治疗的临床事件。随机分组时,559 名 NSBB 使用者比 629 名非使用者更有可能有静脉曲张出血史,但更不可能有 Child-Pugh C 级肝硬化、低钠血症或难治性腹水。NSBB 使用者和非使用者的 52 周累积全因死亡率相似(23.2%对 25.3%,调整后的危险比=0.92,95%置信区间 0.72-1.18),NSBB 也不会增加难治性腹水患者(588 例患者)的死亡率(调整后的危险比=1.02,95%置信区间 0.74-1.40)或任何其他亚组。同样,NSBB 也不会增加肝硬化相关死亡率(调整后的危险比=1.00,95%置信区间 0.76-1.31)。在随访期间,29%的初始 NSBB 使用者停止服用 NSBB,停止 NSBB 治疗的决定标志着死亡率急剧上升,并与住院、静脉曲张出血、细菌感染和/或肝肾综合征的发生同时发生。

结论

本研究基于全球范围内肝硬化腹水患者非协议使用 NSBB 的大量详细数据,表明 NSBB 并未增加死亡率;与应激事件相关的停止 NSBB 治疗的决定可能增加了安全性。(《肝脏病学》2016;63:1968-1976)

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验