Suppr超能文献

非选择性β受体阻滞剂与肝硬化伴腹水患者生存:系统评价和荟萃分析。

Nonselective β-Blockers and Survival in Patients With Cirrhosis and Ascites: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

机构信息

Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota; Division of Gastroenterology, Phramongkutklao Hospital and College of Medicine, Royal Thai Army, Bangkok, Thailand.

Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota.

出版信息

Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2016 Aug;14(8):1096-1104.e9. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2016.01.012. Epub 2016 Jan 30.

Abstract

BACKGROUND & AIMS: Nonselective β-blockers (NSBBs), given to reduce the risk of variceal bleeding, have been associated with increased mortality in patients with cirrhosis and refractory ascites in some, but not all, studies. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate the effect of NSBBs on all-cause mortality in patients with cirrhosis and refractory ascites.

METHODS

We performed a comprehensive search of MEDLINE, Embase, Web of Science, and Scopus databases through January 2015, supplemented with a manual search. Trial-specific risk ratios (RRs) were pooled using the random-effects model.

RESULTS

Our analysis included 3 randomized control trials and 8 observational studies of propranolol, carvedilol, nadolol, and metoprolol, reporting 1206 deaths among 3145 patients with ascites. The control groups received other interventions to prevent variceal bleeding. NSBB use was not associated with increased all-cause mortality in all patients with ascites (RR, 0.95; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.67-1.35); nonrefractory ascites alone (RR, 0.96; 95% CI, 0.50-1.82), or refractory ascites alone (RR, 0.95; 95% CI, 0.57-1.61). Results were similar in randomized controlled trials and observational studies. Use of NSBBs was not associated with increased mortality at 6, 12, 18, and 24 months. Overall, the included studies had a medium to high risk of bias, except for 3 clinical trials in which the risk of biased was determined to be low.

CONCLUSIONS

The use of NSBBs was not associated with a significant increase in all-cause mortality in patients with cirrhosis and ascites or refractory ascites. Certainty in the available estimates is low; a randomized trial of only patients with ascites is needed to answer this question. This meta-analysis does not support the position that NSBBs routinely be withheld from patients with ascites.

摘要

背景与目的

非选择性β受体阻滞剂(NSBBs)可降低静脉曲张出血风险,但在一些研究中,而非所有研究中,均发现其与肝硬化伴难治性腹水患者的死亡率增加相关。我们进行了系统评价和荟萃分析,以评估 NSBBs 对肝硬化伴难治性腹水患者全因死亡率的影响。

方法

我们全面检索了 MEDLINE、Embase、Web of Science 和 Scopus 数据库,检索时间截至 2015 年 1 月,并辅以手工检索。采用随机效应模型对试验特异性风险比(RR)进行汇总。

结果

我们的分析纳入了 3 项随机对照试验和 8 项观察性研究,涉及普萘洛尔、卡维地洛、纳多洛尔和美托洛尔,共纳入 3145 例腹水患者的 1206 例死亡。对照组接受了其他预防静脉曲张出血的干预措施。NSBB 治疗并未增加所有腹水患者(RR,0.95;95%置信区间[CI],0.67-1.35)、单纯非难治性腹水患者(RR,0.96;95%CI,0.50-1.82)或单纯难治性腹水患者(RR,0.95;95%CI,0.57-1.61)的全因死亡率。随机对照试验和观察性研究的结果相似。NSBB 治疗与 6、12、18 和 24 个月时的死亡率增加无关。总体而言,除 3 项临床试验的偏倚风险被确定为低之外,纳入研究的偏倚风险为中至高。

结论

NSBB 治疗并未显著增加肝硬化伴腹水或难治性腹水患者的全因死亡率。现有估计值的确定性较低;需要一项仅纳入腹水患者的随机试验来回答这个问题。本荟萃分析不支持常规对腹水患者停用 NSBBs 的观点。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验