Suppr超能文献

糖尿病自我管理教育的糖尿病对话地图™教育工具评估

Evaluation of Diabetes Conversation Map™ Education Tools for Diabetes Self-Management Education.

作者信息

Ghafoor Erum, Riaz Musarrat, Eichorst Barbara, Fawwad Asher, Basit Abdul

机构信息

Baqai Institute of Diabetology and Endocrinology, Baqai Medical University, Nazimabad, Karachi - Pakistan.

Healthy Interactions, Chicago, IL.

出版信息

Diabetes Spectr. 2015 Nov;28(4):230-5. doi: 10.2337/diaspect.28.4.230.

Abstract

Objective. To evaluate the efficacy of Diabetes Conversation Maps™ education tools for people with type 2 diabetes attending a diabetes self-management education program. Design and methods. This cross-sectional study was conducted with patients with type 2 diabetes who were recruited from Baqai Institute of Diabetology & Endocrinology, a tertiary care diabetes center of Karachi, Pakistan, from May 2010 to June 2011. Groups of 10-12 participants were given a pre-session questionnaire. Four sessions using Diabetes Conversation Maps™ education tools were conducted, and the same questionnaire was then completed again. Results. A total of 172 people (82 males, 90 females, mean age 60 years, average duration of diabetes 15 ± 4 years) participated in the study. Confidence in diabetes self-management: before the sessions, 52.3% of participants believed that the doctor is the most influential person in the management of their type 2 diabetes, whereas after the sessions, 97.1% acknowledged that they were responsible for diabetes self-management. Before, 15% said they knew what to do to manage their diabetes, whereas 75% indicated this after the sessions. Empowerment: before the sessions, 32% said they understood those aspects of their diabetes self-management that were in need of improvement, whereas 75.6% indicated this after the sessions. Willingness, ability, and preparedness for diabetes self-management: before the sessions, 22% said they understood the importance of diabetes self-management; this increased to 63.4% afterward. Before, 20.3% agreed that they will start making changes in their lives, whereas 65.7% agreed with this after the sessions. Satisfaction: 61% found the map sessions very effective, 72.1% found this format to be better than individual education, and 52.8% agreed that map tools helped in goal-setting. Conclusion. Diabetes Conversation Maps™ education tools are effective for diabetes self-management education and facilitating behavior change in people with type 2 diabetes. This, in turn, may improve patients' chances of attaining desirable diabetes control.

摘要

目的。评估糖尿病交流地图™教育工具对参加糖尿病自我管理教育项目的2型糖尿病患者的疗效。设计与方法。这项横断面研究是对2010年5月至2011年6月从巴基斯坦卡拉奇的三级护理糖尿病中心巴凯糖尿病与内分泌研究所招募的2型糖尿病患者进行的。将10 - 12名参与者分为一组,在课程开始前发放问卷。使用糖尿病交流地图™教育工具进行了四次课程,之后再次完成相同的问卷。结果。共有172人(82名男性,90名女性,平均年龄60岁,糖尿病平均病程15±4年)参与了该研究。糖尿病自我管理的信心:在课程开始前,52.3%的参与者认为医生是管理其2型糖尿病最有影响力的人,而在课程结束后,97.1%的人承认他们对糖尿病自我管理负责。之前,15%的人表示知道如何管理自己的糖尿病,而课程结束后这一比例为75%。自我管理能力增强:在课程开始前,32%的人表示他们了解自身糖尿病自我管理中需要改进的方面,而课程结束后这一比例为75.6%。糖尿病自我管理的意愿、能力和准备情况:在课程开始前,22%的人表示他们理解糖尿病自我管理的重要性;之后这一比例增至6

相似文献

1
Evaluation of Diabetes Conversation Map™ Education Tools for Diabetes Self-Management Education.
Diabetes Spectr. 2015 Nov;28(4):230-5. doi: 10.2337/diaspect.28.4.230.
3
Diabetes Conversation Map™ and health outcomes: A systematic literature review.
Int J Nurs Stud. 2017 May;70:99-109. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2017.02.004. Epub 2017 Feb 10.
4
Assessment of Factors Associated With Non-Compliance to Self-Management Practices in People With Type 2 Diabetes.
Cureus. 2021 Oct 20;13(10):e18918. doi: 10.7759/cureus.18918. eCollection 2021 Oct.
7
[IDEM-depression: Characteristics and evaluation of an open group that combines psychoeducation and cognitive-behavior therapy].
Encephale. 2018 Apr;44(2):141-147. doi: 10.1016/j.encep.2016.09.004. Epub 2016 Oct 28.
9
Impact of "Conversation Maps" on diabetes distress and self-efficacy of Chinese adult patients with type 2 diabetes: a pilot study.
Patient Prefer Adherence. 2016 May 24;10:901-8. doi: 10.2147/PPA.S95449. eCollection 2016.
10
Impact of 24-hour helpline service for people with diabetes.
Pak J Med Sci. 2017 May-Jun;33(3):747-751. doi: 10.12669/pjms.333.12689.

引用本文的文献

7
Empowerment in the Treatment of Diabetes and Obesity.
J Diabetes Res. 2016;2016:5671492. doi: 10.1155/2016/5671492. Epub 2016 Dec 20.

本文引用的文献

1
Diabetes conversation map in Nigeria: A new socioeducational tool in diabetes care.
Indian J Endocrinol Metab. 2013 Nov;17(6):1009-11. doi: 10.4103/2230-8210.122613.
2
Comparative effectiveness of patient education methods for type 2 diabetes: a randomized controlled trial.
Arch Intern Med. 2011 Dec 12;171(22):2001-10. doi: 10.1001/archinternmed.2011.507. Epub 2011 Oct 10.
4
Patient-centered goal setting as a tool to improve diabetes self-management.
Diabetes Educ. 2007 Jun;33 Suppl 6:139S-144S. doi: 10.1177/0145721707304475.
5
Patient empowerment: reflections on the challenge of fostering the adoption of a new paradigm.
Patient Educ Couns. 2005 May;57(2):153-7. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2004.05.008.
6
Global prevalence of diabetes: estimates for the year 2000 and projections for 2030.
Diabetes Care. 2004 May;27(5):1047-53. doi: 10.2337/diacare.27.5.1047.
7
Diabetes education outcomes: what educators are doing.
Diabetes Educ. 2000 Nov-Dec;26(6):951-4. doi: 10.1177/014572170002600607.
8
Assessment of group versus individual diabetes education: a randomized study.
Diabetes Care. 2002 Feb;25(2):269-74. doi: 10.2337/diacare.25.2.269.
10
Economic consequences of diabetes mellitus in the U.S. in 1997. American Diabetes Association.
Diabetes Care. 1998 Feb;21(2):296-309. doi: 10.2337/diacare.21.2.296.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验