Han Zhaohui, Bondeson John C, Lewis John H, Mannarino Edward G, Friesen Scott A, Wagar Matthew M, Balboni Tracy A, Alexander Brian M, Arvold Nils D, Sher David J, Hacker Fred L
Department of Radiation Oncology, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Dana Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts; Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.
Department of Radiation Oncology, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois.
Pract Radiat Oncol. 2016 Jan-Feb;6(1):e17-24. doi: 10.1016/j.prro.2015.08.009. Epub 2015 Aug 29.
The purposes of this study were (1) to evaluate the initial setup accuracy and intrafraction motion for spine stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) using stereotactic body frames (SBFs) and (2) to validate an in-house-developed SBF using a commercial SBF as a benchmark.
Thirty-two spine SBRT patients (34 sites, 118 fractions) were immobilized with the Elekta and in-house (BHS) SBFs. All patients were set up with the Brainlab ExacTrac system, which includes infrared and stereoscopic kilovoltage x-ray-based positioning. Patients were initially positioned in the frame with the use of skin tattoos and then shifted to the treatment isocenter based on infrared markers affixed to the frame with known geometry relative to the isocenter. ExacTrac kV imaging was acquired, and automatic 6D (6 degrees of freedom) bony fusion was performed. The resulting translations and rotations gave the initial setup accuracy. These translations and rotations were corrected for by use of a robotic couch, and verification imaging was acquired that yielded residual setup error. The imaging/fusion process was repeated multiple times during treatment to provide intrafraction motion data.
The BHS SBF had greater initial setup errors (mean±SD): -3.9±5.5mm (0.2±0.9°), -1.6±6.0mm (0.5±1.4°), and 0.0±5.3mm (0.8±1.0°), respectively, in the vertical (VRT), longitudinal (LNG), and lateral (LAT) directions. The corresponding values were 0.6±2.7mm (0.2±0.6°), 0.9±5.3mm (-0.2±0.9°), and -0.9±3.0mm (0.3±0.9°) for the Elekta SBF. The residual setup errors were essentially the same for both frames and were -0.1±0.4mm (0.1±0.5°), -0.2±0.4mm (0.0±0.4°), and 0.0±0.4mm (0.0±0.4°), respectively, in VRT, LNG, and LAT. The intrafraction shifts in VRT, LNG, and LAT were 0.0±0.4mm (0.0±0.3°), 0.0±0.5mm (0.0±0.4°), and 0.0±0.4mm (0.0±0.3°), with no significant difference observed between the 2 frames.
These results showed that the combination of the ExacTrac system with either SBF was highly effective in achieving both setup accuracy and intrafraction stability, which were on par with that of mask-based cranial radiosurgery.
本研究的目的是:(1)使用立体定向体架(SBF)评估脊柱立体定向体部放射治疗(SBRT)的初始摆位精度和分次内运动;(2)以商用SBF为基准,验证自行研发的SBF。
32例脊柱SBRT患者(34个部位,118个分次)使用医科达和自行研发的(BHS)SBF进行固定。所有患者均采用Brainlab ExacTrac系统进行摆位,该系统包括基于红外和立体千伏级X射线的定位。患者最初通过皮肤标记置于体架中,然后根据固定在体架上且相对于等中心具有已知几何关系的红外标记,转移至治疗等中心。采集ExacTrac千伏级成像,并进行自动6维(6自由度)骨融合。由此得到的平移和旋转给出初始摆位精度。通过使用机器人治疗床对这些平移和旋转进行校正,并采集验证成像以得出残余摆位误差。在治疗期间多次重复成像/融合过程,以提供分次内运动数据。
BHS SBF在垂直(VRT)、纵向(LNG)和横向(LAT)方向上的初始摆位误差更大(均值±标准差):分别为-3.9±5.5mm(0.2±0.9°)、-1.6±6.0mm(0.5±1.4°)和0.0±5.3mm(0.8±1.0°)。医科达SBF的相应值分别为0.6±2.7mm(0.2±0.6°)、0.9±5.3mm(-0.2±0.9°)和-0.9±3.0mm(0.3±0.9°)。两种体架的残余摆位误差基本相同,在VRT、LNG和LAT方向上分别为-0.1±0.4mm(0.1±0.5°)、-0.2±0.4mm(0.0±0.4°)和0.0±0.4mm(0.0±0.4°)。VRT、LNG和LAT方向上的分次内位移分别为0.0±0.4mm(0.0±0.3°)、0.0±0.5mm(0.0±0.4°)和0.0±0.4mm(0.0±0.3°),两种体架之间未观察到显著差异。
这些结果表明,ExacTrac系统与任何一种SBF相结合,在实现摆位精度和分次内稳定性方面都非常有效,与基于面罩的颅脑放射外科手术相当。