Department of Radiotherapy, Universitair Ziekenhuis Brussel, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Brussels, Belgium.
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2012 May 1;83(1):467-74. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2011.05.048. Epub 2011 Sep 22.
To evaluate the added value of 6-degree of freedom (DOF) patient positioning with a robotic couch compared with 4DOF positioning for intracranial lesions and to estimate the immobilization characteristics of the BrainLAB frameless mask (BrainLAB AG, Feldkirchen, Germany), more specifically, the setup errors and intrafraction motion.
We enrolled 40 patients with 66 brain metastases treated with frameless stereotactic radiosurgery and a 6DOF robotic couch. Patient positioning was performed with the BrainLAB ExacTrac stereoscopic X-ray system. Positioning results were collected before and after treatment to assess patient setup error and intrafraction motion. Existing treatment planning data were loaded and simulated for 4DOF positioning and compared with the 6DOF positioning. The clinical relevance was analyzed by means of the Paddick conformity index and the ratio of prescribed isodose volume covered with 4DOF to that obtained with the 6DOF positioning.
The mean three-dimensional setup error before 6DOF correction was 1.91 mm (SD, 1.25 mm). The rotational errors were larger in the longitudinal (mean, 0.23°; SD, 0.82°) direction compared with the lateral (mean, -0.09°; SD, 0.72°) and vertical (mean, -0.10°; SD, 1.03°) directions (p < 0.05). The mean three-dimensional intrafraction shift was 0.58 mm (SD, 0.42 mm). The mean intrafractional rotational errors were comparable for the vertical, longitudinal, and lateral directions: 0.01° (SD, 0.35°), 0.03° (SD, 0.31°), and -0.03° (SD, 0.33°), respectively. The mean conformity index decreased from 0.68 (SD, 0.08) (6DOF) to 0.59 (SD, 0.12) (4DOF) (p < 0.05). A loss of prescribed isodose coverage of 5% (SD, 0.08) was found with the 4DOF positioning (p < 0.05). Half a degree for longitudinal and lateral rotations can be identified as a threshold for coverage loss.
With a mask immobilization, patient setup error and intrafraction motions need to be evaluated and corrected for. The 6DOF patient positioning with a 6DOF robotic couch to correct translational and rotational setup errors improves target positioning with respect to treatment isocenter, which is in direct relation with the clinical outcome, compared with the 4DOF positioning.
评估与 4 自由度(DOF)定位相比,使用机器人治疗床进行 6 自由度(DOF)患者定位对颅内病变的附加价值,并估计 BrainLAB 无框架面罩(BrainLAB AG,Feldkirchen,德国)的固定特征,特别是定位误差和分次内运动。
我们纳入了 40 名接受无框架立体定向放射外科治疗的 66 个脑转移瘤患者。使用 BrainLAB ExacTrac 立体 X 射线系统进行患者定位。在治疗前后收集定位结果,以评估患者的设置误差和分次内运动。加载并模拟现有的治疗计划数据以进行 4DOF 定位,并与 6DOF 定位进行比较。通过 Paddick 适形指数和 4DOF 规定等剂量体积覆盖与 6DOF 定位获得的覆盖比来分析临床相关性。
6DOF 校正前的平均三维设置误差为 1.91mm(标准差,1.25mm)。与侧向(平均,-0.09°;标准差,0.72°)和垂直(平均,-0.10°;标准差,1.03°)方向相比,纵向(平均,0.23°;标准差,0.82°)的旋转误差更大(p <0.05)。平均分次内移位为 0.58mm(标准差,0.42mm)。垂直、纵向和横向方向的平均分次内旋转误差相当:0.01°(标准差,0.35°)、0.03°(标准差,0.31°)和-0.03°(标准差,0.33°)。平均适形指数从 6DOF 的 0.68(标准差,0.08)降至 4DOF 的 0.59(标准差,0.12)(p<0.05)。发现 4DOF 定位时规定等剂量覆盖率丢失 5%(标准差,0.08)(p<0.05)。对于纵向和横向旋转,半度可以作为覆盖损失的阈值。
对于面罩固定,需要评估和校正患者的设置误差和分次内运动。与 4DOF 定位相比,使用 6DOF 机器人治疗床进行 6DOF 患者定位以纠正平移和旋转设置误差,可以改善相对于治疗等中心的目标定位,这与临床结果直接相关。