Oh Se An, Park Jae Won, Yea Ji Woon, Kim Sung Kyu
Department of Radiation Oncology, Yeungnam University Medical Center, Daegu, Korea.
Department of Radiation Oncology, Yeungnam University College of Medicine, Daegu, Korea.
PLoS One. 2017 May 19;12(5):e0177798. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0177798. eCollection 2017.
The objective of this study was to evaluate the setup discrepancy between BrainLAB 6 degree-of-freedom (6D) ExacTrac and cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) used with the imaging guidance system Novalis Tx for intracranial stereotactic radiosurgery. We included 107 consecutive patients for whom white stereotactic head frame masks (R408; Clarity Medical Products, Newark, OH) were used to fix the head during intracranial stereotactic radiosurgery, between August 2012 and July 2016. The patients were immobilized in the same state for both the verification image using 6D ExacTrac and online 3D CBCT. In addition, after radiation treatment, registration between the computed tomography simulation images and the CBCT images was performed with offline 6D fusion in an offline review. The root-mean-square of the difference in the translational dimensions between the ExacTrac system and CBCT was <1.01 mm for online matching and <1.10 mm for offline matching. Furthermore, the root-mean-square of the difference in the rotational dimensions between the ExacTrac system and the CBCT were <0.82° for online matching and <0.95° for offline matching. It was concluded that while the discrepancies in residual setup errors between the ExacTrac 6D X-ray and the CBCT were minor, they should not be ignored.
本研究的目的是评估用于颅内立体定向放射治疗的BrainLAB 6自由度(6D)ExacTrac与联合成像引导系统Novalis Tx使用的锥形束计算机断层扫描(CBCT)之间的摆位差异。我们纳入了2012年8月至2016年7月期间在颅内立体定向放射治疗期间连续107例使用白色立体定向头架面罩(R408;Clarity Medical Products,俄亥俄州纽瓦克)固定头部的患者。患者在使用6D ExacTrac进行验证图像采集和在线3D CBCT扫描时均处于相同的固定状态。此外,放射治疗后,在离线复查中使用离线6D融合技术对计算机断层扫描模拟图像和CBCT图像进行配准。ExacTrac系统与CBCT之间平移维度差异的均方根在线匹配时<1.01 mm,离线匹配时<1.10 mm。此外,ExacTrac系统与CBCT之间旋转维度差异的均方根在线匹配时<0.82°,离线匹配时<0.95°。得出的结论是,虽然ExacTrac 6D X射线与CBCT之间残余摆位误差的差异较小,但不应忽视。