Gusic N, Fedel I, Darabos N, Lovric Z, Bukvic N, Bakota B, Lemac D
Department for Traumatology and Orthopaedics, Pula County Hospital, Negrijeva 6, HR-52100 Pula, Croatia.
University Clinic for Traumatology, Clinical Hospital Centre "Sisters of Charity", Draskoviceva ulica 19, HR-10000 Zagreb, Croatia.
Injury. 2015 Nov;46 Suppl 6:S130-3. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2015.10.061. Epub 2015 Nov 20.
Management of the intraarticular calcaneal fracture is a challenge. The optimal method of treatment remains controversial. This study evaluates the anatomical and functional postoperative outcomes of displaced intraarticular calcaneal fractures that have been treated using three different techniques of ORIF.
Between 2004 and 2011 we treated 143 patients with calcaneal fractures, 40 of these patients (28%) were treated conservatively. This is a retrospective study of the remaining 103 patients (72%) who were operated on consecutively, mainly by one surgeon (NG). Calcaneal fractures were classified according to the Sanders classification. Three types of osteosynthesis were used: standard anatomical plate (SP), locking anatomical plate (LCP) and standard anatomical plate with autologous bone graft (SP+ABG). Clinical outcome was assessed one year after the operation: anatomical reduction was evaluated according to the analysis of Bohler's angle at final follow-up, and functional assessment was conducted using the Maryland Foot Score (MFS).
The fractures were classified as follows: 35 (34%) Sanders type II, 47 (45.6%) Sanders type III and 21 (20.4%) Sanders type IV. The SP was used in 67 (65%) fractures, LCP in 16 (15.5%) and SP+ABH in 20 (19.4%). The correlation test showed a weak association between the Sanders fracture type and the operation technique (Pearson correlation coefficient r=0.26). The non-parametric tests showed that the fracture type did not significantly influence the postoperative Bohler's angle outcome (p=0.132), or the type of operation (p=0.664). Excellent or good reduction of the posterior calcaneal facet was achieved in all operated fractures. One year after the operation, the distribution of Bohler's angle was normal with a mean 31.9° (SD 4.84) in all three groups. There was no significant difference in the functional postoperative outcome in terms of MFS in the three groups (p=0.601), but the Sanders fracture type had significant influence on the functional postoperative outcome in terms of MFS (p=0.001).
In the representative sample of 103 operatively treated intraarticular calcaneal fractures, anatomical and functional postoperative efficacy outcomes appeared to be similar in all three treatment groups. High-grade displaced intraarticular calcaneal fractures (Sanders IV) had worse functional results irrespective of the type of operation. The optimal method for management of intraarticular calcaneal fracture is operative, using the standard anatomic calcaneal plate. Autologous bone grafting is not required. Large sample comparative studies are still needed.
跟骨关节内骨折的治疗是一项挑战。最佳治疗方法仍存在争议。本研究评估了采用三种不同切开复位内固定技术治疗的移位性跟骨关节内骨折的术后解剖学和功能学结果。
2004年至2011年间,我们共治疗了143例跟骨骨折患者,其中40例(28%)接受了保守治疗。本研究对其余103例(72%)连续接受手术治疗的患者进行了回顾性分析,主要由一名外科医生(NG)操作。跟骨骨折根据Sanders分类法进行分类。采用了三种内固定方式:标准解剖钢板(SP)、锁定解剖钢板(LCP)和带自体骨移植的标准解剖钢板(SP+ABG)。术后一年评估临床结果:根据末次随访时Bohler角的分析评估解剖复位情况,并使用马里兰足部评分(MFS)进行功能评估。
骨折分类如下:35例(34%)为Sanders II型,47例(45.6%)为Sanders III型,21例(20.4%)为Sanders IV型。67例(65%)骨折采用SP固定,16例(15.5%)采用LCP固定,20例(19.4%)采用SP+ABH固定。相关性检验显示Sanders骨折类型与手术技术之间存在弱相关性(Pearson相关系数r=0.26)。非参数检验表明,骨折类型对术后Bohler角结果(p=0.132)或手术类型(p=0.664)无显著影响。所有手术治疗的骨折均实现了跟骨后关节面的优良复位。术后一年,三组患者Bohler角分布均呈正态分布,平均为31.9°(标准差4.84)。三组患者术后MFS功能结果无显著差异(p=0.601),但Sanders骨折类型对术后MFS功能结果有显著影响(p=0.001)。
在103例接受手术治疗的跟骨关节内骨折代表性样本中,所有三个治疗组的术后解剖学和功能学疗效结果似乎相似。无论手术类型如何,高级别移位性跟骨关节内骨折(Sanders IV型)的功能结果均较差。跟骨关节内骨折的最佳治疗方法是手术治疗,采用标准解剖跟骨钢板。无需自体骨移植。仍需要大样本比较研究。