Al Hilli Mariam M, Bakkum-Gamez Jamie N, Mariani Andrea, Cliby William A, Mc Gree Michaela E, Weaver Amy L, Dowdy Sean C, Podratz Karl C
Division of Gynecologic Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, United States.
Division of Biomedical Statistics and Informatics, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, United States.
Gynecol Oncol. 2016 Feb;140(2):270-6. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2015.11.019. Epub 2015 Dec 1.
To examine the influence of diabetes and metformin therapy on overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) in patients with endometrial cancer (EC) by using propensity score (PS) matching to account for confounding factors.
We retrospectively identified consecutive patients with stage I-IV EC managed surgically from 1999 through 2008 and stratified patients by diabetes status. PS matching was used to adjust for confounding covariates. OS and PFS were compared between diabetic and nondiabetic matched pairs and between matched pairs of diabetic patients with or without metformin therapy. Cox proportional hazards models were fit to estimate the effects on outcomes.
Among 1303 eligible patients (79% stage I, 28% grade 3), 277 (21.3%) had a history of diabetes. Among diabetic patients, treatment consisted of metformin in 116 (41.9%); 57 (20.6%) had other oral agents, 51 (18.4%) insulin with or without other oral agents, and 53 (19.1%) diet modification only. For PS-matched diabetic and nondiabetic patients with EC, OS (hazard ratio [HR], 1.01; 95% CI, 0.72-1.42) and PFS (HR, 1.01; 95% CI, 0.60-1.69) were similar between matched subsets. No differences in OS and PFS were observed when comparing PS-matched metformin users with nondiabetic patients (OS HR, 1.03; 95% CI, 0.57-1.85; PFS HR, 1.14; 95% CI, 0.49-2.62) or with other diabetic patients (OS HR, 0.61; 95% CI, 0.30-1.23; PFS HR, 1.06; 95% CI, 0.34-3.30).
When adjusted for confounding covariates, OS and PFS are similar between diabetic and nondiabetic patients with EC and between metformin users and nonusers or nondiabetic patients.
通过倾向评分(PS)匹配以考虑混杂因素,研究糖尿病和二甲双胍治疗对子宫内膜癌(EC)患者总生存期(OS)和无进展生存期(PFS)的影响。
我们回顾性确定了1999年至2008年期间接受手术治疗的连续I-IV期EC患者,并根据糖尿病状态对患者进行分层。采用PS匹配来调整混杂协变量。比较糖尿病和非糖尿病匹配对之间以及接受或未接受二甲双胍治疗的糖尿病患者匹配对之间的OS和PFS。采用Cox比例风险模型来估计对结局的影响。
在1303例符合条件的患者中(79%为I期,28%为3级),277例(21.3%)有糖尿病史。在糖尿病患者中,116例(41.9%)接受二甲双胍治疗;57例(20.6%)使用其他口服药物,51例(18.4%)使用胰岛素加或不加其他口服药物,53例(19.1%)仅采用饮食调整。对于PS匹配的糖尿病和非糖尿病EC患者,匹配亚组之间的OS(风险比[HR]为1.01;95%CI为0.72-1.42)和PFS(HR为1.01;95%CI为0.60-1.69)相似。比较PS匹配的二甲双胍使用者与非糖尿病患者(OS HR为1.03;95%CI为0.57-1.85;PFS HR为1.14;95%CI为0.49-2.62)或与其他糖尿病患者(OS HR为0.61;95%CI为0.30-1.23;PFS HR为1.06;95%CI为0.34-3.30)时,未观察到OS和PFS的差异。
在调整混杂协变量后,糖尿病和非糖尿病EC患者之间以及二甲双胍使用者与非使用者或非糖尿病患者之间的OS和PFS相似。