AlHilli Mariam M, Bakkum-Gamez Jamie N, Mariani Andrea, Weaver Amy L, McGree Michaela E, Keeney Gary L, Jatoi Aminah, Dowdy Sean C, Podratz Karl C
Division of Gynecologic Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
Division of Biomedical Statistics and Informatics, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
Gynecol Oncol. 2015 Jul;138(1):133-40. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2015.04.010. Epub 2015 Apr 17.
To reexamine the tenet that advanced age independently impacts progression-free and cause-specific survival in patients with endometrial cancer (EC).
Patients undergoing surgery for stages I-IIIC EC between 1999 and 2008 were stratified by age (<70 vs ≥70years). Three propensity score (PS) methods were utilized to adjust for confounding risk factors. The PS, or conditional probability of being ≥70years old, given a patient's baseline covariates, was derived using logistic regression. The Cox proportional hazards models were fit to estimate the effect of age≥70years on outcomes.
Of 1182 eligible patients, 822 (69.5%) were <70 and 360 (30.5%) were ≥70. Patients ≥70 were more likely to have multiple adverse risk factors. The total standardized difference of these factors was reduced by 74% and 81%, respectively, using PS-stratification and PS-matching analyses. The nonsignificant trend toward an association between progression-free survival and age≥70 in an unadjusted analysis (hazard ratio [HR], 1.40; 95% CI, 0.95-2.04) was further attenuated in the 3 PS analyses. The unadjusted HR for the association between age≥70 and cause-specific survival was 2.03 (95% CI, 1.32-3.13). HRs were attenuated in PS analyses but retained significance (except for PS matching), potentially reflecting differences in salvage therapies (P<.001), including a 3-fold greater use of chemotherapy in those <70.
When risk-adjusted for the higher prevalence of adverse prognostic factors in elderly EC patients, progression-free survival after primary therapy is not age dependent but the less favorable cause-specific survival in this cohort may reflect age-related postrecurrence treatment differences.
重新审视高龄对子宫内膜癌(EC)患者无进展生存期和病因特异性生存期有独立影响这一观点。
将1999年至2008年间接受I-IIIC期EC手术的患者按年龄分层(<70岁与≥70岁)。采用三种倾向评分(PS)方法来调整混杂风险因素。PS即给定患者基线协变量时≥70岁的条件概率,通过逻辑回归得出。采用Cox比例风险模型来估计≥70岁对结局的影响。
在1182例符合条件的患者中,822例(69.5%)<70岁,360例(30.5%)≥70岁。≥70岁的患者更可能有多种不良风险因素。使用PS分层和PS匹配分析后,这些因素的总标准化差异分别降低了74%和81%。在未调整分析中,无进展生存期与≥70岁之间的关联呈无显著意义的趋势(风险比[HR],1.40;95%置信区间,0.95-2.04),在三种PS分析中进一步减弱。≥70岁与病因特异性生存期之间关联的未调整HR为2.03(95%置信区间,1.32-3.13)。HR在PS分析中减弱但仍具有显著性(PS匹配除外),这可能反映了挽救治疗的差异(P<.001),包括<70岁患者化疗使用量是≥70岁患者的3倍。
对老年EC患者不良预后因素的较高患病率进行风险调整后,初始治疗后的无进展生存期并非年龄依赖性,但该队列中较差的病因特异性生存期可能反映了与年龄相关的复发后治疗差异。