Kaiser Daniel W, Hsia Henry H, Dubin Anne M, Liem L Bing, Viswanathan Mohan N, Zei Paul C, Wang Paul J, Narayan Sanjiv M, Turakhia Mintu P
Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California; El Camino Hospital, Mountain View, California.
University of California, San Francisco, California.
Heart Rhythm. 2016 Mar;13(3):695-703. doi: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2015.11.032. Epub 2015 Dec 2.
Previous observations have reported that the number of pacing stimuli required to entrain a tachycardia varies on the basis of arrhythmia type and location, but a quantitative formulation of the number needed to entrain (NNE) that unifies these observations has not been characterized.
We sought to investigate the relationship between the number of pacing stimulations, the tachycardia cycle length (TCL), the overdrive pacing cycle length (PCL), and the postpacing interval (PPI) to accurately estimate the timing of tachycardia entrainment.
First, we detailed a mathematical derivation unifying electrophysiological parameters with empirical confirmation in 2 patients undergoing catheter ablation of typical atrial flutter. Second, we validated our formula in 44 patients who underwent various catheter ablation procedures. For accuracy, we corrected for rate-related changes in conduction velocity.
We derived the equations NNE = |(PPI - TCL)/(TCL - PCL)| + 1 and Tachycardia advancement = (NNE - 1) × (TCL - PCL) - (PPI - TCL), which state that the NNE and the amount of tachycardia advancement on the first resetting stimulation are determined using regularly measured intracardiac parameters. In the retrospective cohort, the observed PPI - TCL highly correlated with the predicted PPI - TCL (mean difference 5.8 ms; r = 0.97; P < .001), calculated as PPI - TCL = (NNE - 1) × (TCL - PCL) - tachycardia advancement.
The number of pacing stimulations required to entrain a reentrant tachycardia is predictable at any PCL after correcting for cycle length-dependent changes in conduction velocity. This relationship unifies established empirically derived diagnostic and mapping criteria for supraventricular tachycardia and ventricular tachycardia. This relationship may help elucidate when antitachycardia pacing episodes are ineffective or proarrhythmic and could potentially serve as a theoretical basis to customize antitachycardia pacing settings for improved safety and effectiveness.
先前的观察报告指出,用于诱发心动过速的起搏刺激数量会因心律失常类型和部位的不同而有所变化,但尚未对统一这些观察结果的诱发所需刺激数量(NNE)进行定量表述。
我们旨在研究起搏刺激数量、心动过速周期长度(TCL)、超速起搏周期长度(PCL)和起搏后间期(PPI)之间的关系,以准确估计心动过速诱发的时机。
首先,我们详细阐述了一个数学推导过程,该推导将电生理参数与2例接受典型心房扑动导管消融术患者的经验性确认相结合。其次,我们在44例接受各种导管消融手术的患者中验证了我们的公式。为了确保准确性,我们对与速率相关的传导速度变化进行了校正。
我们推导出公式NNE = |(PPI - TCL)/(TCL - PCL)| + 1和心动过速提前量 = (NNE - 1) × (TCL - PCL) - (PPI - TCL),这表明NNE和首次重置刺激时的心动过速提前量是通过常规测量的心内参数来确定的。在回顾性队列中,观察到的PPI - TCL与预测的PPI - TCL高度相关(平均差异5.8毫秒;r = 0.97;P <.001),计算方法为PPI - TCL = (NNE - 1) × (TCL - PCL) - 心动过速提前量。
在校正传导速度的周期长度依赖性变化后,在任何PCL下诱发折返性心动过速所需的起搏刺激数量都是可预测的。这种关系统一了基于经验得出的室上性心动过速和室性心动过速的诊断和标测标准。这种关系可能有助于阐明抗心动过速起搏发作无效或促心律失常的情况,并有可能作为定制抗心动过速起搏设置以提高安全性和有效性的理论基础。