Alghnam Suliman, Palta Mari, Hamedani Azita, Remington Patrick L, Alkelya Mohamed, Albedah Khalid, Durkin Maureen S
Postdoctoral Researcher, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD USA.
Population Health Sciences, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI USA.
Inj Epidemiol. 2014;1(1):21. doi: 10.1186/s40621-014-0021-4. Epub 2014 Aug 27.
Traffic-related fatalities are a leading cause of premature death worldwide. According to the 2012 report , traffic injuries ranked 8th as a cause of death in 2010, compared to 10th in 1990. Saudi Arabia is estimated to have an overall traffic fatality rate more than double that of the U.S., but it is unknown whether mortality differences also exist for injured patients seeking medical care. We aim to compare in-hospital mortality between Saudi Arabia and the United States, adjusting for severity and demographic variables.
The analysis included 485,611 patients from the U.S. National Trauma Data Bank (NTDB) and 5,290 patients from a trauma registry at King Abdulaziz Medical City (KAMC) in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia. For comparability, we restricted our sample to NTDB data from level-I public trauma centers (≥400 beds) in the U.S. Multiple logistic regression analyses were performed to evaluate the effect of setting (KAMC vs. NTDB) on in-hospital mortality after adjusting for age, sex, Triage-Revised Scale (T-RTS), Injury Severity Score (ISS), mechanism of injury, hypotension, surgery and head injuries. Interactions between setting and ISS, and predictors were also evaluated.
Injured patients in the Saudi registry were more likely to be males, and younger than those from the NTDB. Patients at the Saudi hospital were at higher risk of in-hospital death than their U.S. counterparts. In the highest severity group (ISSs, 25-75), the odds ratio of in-hospital death in KAMC versus NTDB was 5.0 (95% CI 4.3-5.8). There were no differences in mortality between KAMC and NTDB among patients from lower ISS groups (ISSs, 1-8, 9-15, and 16-24).
Patients who are severely injured following traffic crash injuries in Saudi Arabia are significantly more likely to die in the hospital than comparable patients admitted to large U.S. trauma centers. Further research is needed to identify reasons for this disparity and strategies for improving the care of patients severely injured in traffic crashes in Saudi Arabia.
交通事故相关死亡是全球过早死亡的主要原因之一。根据2012年的报告,交通伤害在2010年作为死因排名第8,而在1990年排名第10。据估计,沙特阿拉伯的总体交通死亡率是美国的两倍多,但对于寻求医疗救治的受伤患者,死亡率是否也存在差异尚不清楚。我们旨在比较沙特阿拉伯和美国的住院死亡率,并对严重程度和人口统计学变量进行调整。
分析纳入了来自美国国家创伤数据库(NTDB)的485,611例患者以及来自沙特阿拉伯利雅得阿卜杜勒阿齐兹国王医疗城(KAMC)创伤登记处的5,290例患者。为了具有可比性,我们将样本限制为美国一级公立创伤中心(≥400张床位)的NTDB数据。在对年龄、性别、分诊修订量表(T-RTS)、损伤严重程度评分(ISS)、损伤机制、低血压、手术和头部损伤进行调整后,进行了多项逻辑回归分析,以评估地点(KAMC与NTDB)对住院死亡率的影响。还评估了地点与ISS之间的相互作用以及预测因素。
沙特登记处的受伤患者更可能为男性,且比NTDB的患者年轻。沙特医院的患者比美国同行有更高的住院死亡风险。在最高严重程度组(ISS为25 - 75)中,KAMC与NTDB的住院死亡比值比为5.0(95%可信区间4.3 - 5.8)。在较低ISS组(ISS为1 - 8、9 - 15和16 - 24)的患者中,KAMC与NTDB之间的死亡率没有差异。
在沙特阿拉伯,交通事故受伤后严重受伤的患者在医院死亡的可能性明显高于入住美国大型创伤中心的类似患者。需要进一步研究以确定这种差异的原因以及改善沙特阿拉伯交通事故严重受伤患者护理的策略。