Department of Emergency Medical Service, College of Applied Medical Sciences, Jazan University, 45142, Al Maarefah Rd, Jazan, Saudi Arabia.
Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Public Health, Imperial College London, London, UK.
BMC Public Health. 2023 Jan 4;23(1):22. doi: 10.1186/s12889-023-14981-9.
Lockdown restrictions due to the COVID-19 pandemic have reduced the number of injuries recorded. However, little is known about the impact of easing COVID-19 lockdown restrictions on the nature and outcome of injuries. This study aims to compare injury patterns prior to and after the easing of COVID-19 lockdown restrictions in Saudi Arabia.
Data were collected retrospectively from the Saudi TraumA Registry for the period between March 25, 2019, and June 21, 2021. These data corresponded to three periods: March 2019-February 2020 (pre-restrictions, period 1), March 2020-June 2020 (lockdown, period 2), and July 2020-June 2021 (post easing of restrictions, period 3). Data related to patients' demographics, mechanism and severity of injury, and in-hospital mortality were collected and analysed.
A total of 5,147 traumatic injury patients were included in the analysis (pre-restrictions n = 2593; lockdown n = 218; post easing of lockdown restrictions n = 2336). An increase in trauma cases (by 7.6%) was seen in the 30-44 age group after easing restrictions (n = 648 vs. 762, p < 0.01). Motor vehicle crashes (MVC) were the leading cause of injury, followed by falls in all the three periods. MVC-related injuries decreased by 3.1% (n = 1068 vs. 890, p = 0.03) and pedestrian-related injuries decreased by 2.7% (n = 227 vs. 143, p < 0.01); however, burn injuries increased by 2.2% (n = 134 vs. 174, p < 0.01) and violence-related injuries increased by 0.9% (n = 45 vs. 60, p = 0.05) post easing of lockdown restrictions. We observed an increase in in-hospital mortality during the period of 12 months after easing of lockdown restrictions-4.9% (114/2336) compared to 12 months of pre-lockdown period-4.3% (113/2593).
This is one of the first studies to document trauma trends over a one-year period after easing lockdown restrictions. MVC continues to be the leading cause of injuries despite a slight decrease; overall injury cases rebounded towards pre-lockdown levels in Saudi Arabia. Injury prevention needs robust legislation with respect to road safety measures and law enforcement that can decrease the burden of traumatic injuries.
由于 COVID-19 大流行而实施的封锁限制减少了记录到的受伤人数。然而,关于放宽 COVID-19 封锁限制对伤害的性质和结果的影响知之甚少。本研究旨在比较沙特阿拉伯放宽 COVID-19 封锁限制前后的伤害模式。
数据是从沙特创伤登记处回顾性收集的,时间为 2019 年 3 月 25 日至 2021 年 6 月 21 日。这些数据对应于三个时期:2019 年 3 月至 2020 年 2 月(限制前,第 1 期),2020 年 3 月至 2020 年 6 月(封锁期,第 2 期)和 2020 年 7 月至 2021 年 6 月(限制放宽后,第 3 期)。收集并分析了与患者人口统计学、损伤机制和严重程度以及院内死亡率相关的数据。
共纳入 5147 例创伤性损伤患者进行分析(限制前 n=2593;封锁 n=218;放宽封锁限制后 n=2336)。限制放宽后,30-44 岁年龄组的创伤病例增加了 7.6%(n=648 与 762,p<0.01)。机动车碰撞(MVC)是所有三个时期受伤的主要原因,其次是跌倒。与 MVC 相关的损伤减少了 3.1%(n=1068 与 890,p=0.03),与行人相关的损伤减少了 2.7%(n=227 与 143,p<0.01);然而,烧伤损伤增加了 2.2%(n=134 与 174,p<0.01),暴力相关损伤增加了 0.9%(n=45 与 60,p=0.05)放宽封锁限制后。我们观察到放宽封锁限制后 12 个月的院内死亡率增加了 4.9%(114/2336),而 12 个月的封锁前时期为 4.3%(113/2593)。
这是第一项记录放宽封锁限制后一年期间创伤趋势的研究之一。尽管略有下降,MVC 仍然是受伤的主要原因;沙特阿拉伯的整体伤害病例反弹至封锁前水平。需要有强有力的立法,包括道路安全措施和执法,以减少创伤性伤害的负担。