Suppr超能文献

马尔默治疗转介和干预研究(MATRIS)——从注射器交换有效转介到治疗海洛因依赖:一项试点随机对照试验。

Malmö Treatment Referral and Intervention Study (MATRIS)—effective referral from syringe exchange to treatment for heroin dependence: a pilot randomized controlled trial.

出版信息

Addiction. 2016 May;111(5):866-73. doi: 10.1111/add.13249.

Abstract

AIMS

Syringe exchange has been suggested as a potential conduit to treatment for drug dependence, but this has never been documented in Europe. The primary aim was to compare the effectiveness of strength-based case management intervention (CMI) against referral only to facilitate treatment attendance in a syringe exchange programme. We also assessed the effectiveness of a syringe exchange programme for referral of heroin-dependent patients to evidence-based treatment with methadone or buprenorphine (buprenorphine-naloxone).

DESIGN

Single-site, two-group randomized controlled trial.

SETTING

The syringe exchange programme in Malmö, Sweden and an out-patient clinic (research treatment facility) for maintenance treatment, situated outside the hospital area and run by Malmö Addiction Centre.

PARTICIPANTS

Heroin-dependent patients willing to participate (n = 75) were referred to maintenance treatment and randomized to either a strength-based case management intervention aiming to facilitate referral (n = 36) or to referral-only (n = 39).

INTERVENTION

The intervention group received an appointment for maintenance treatment and a CMI adjusted to individual patient needs. The CMI was semi-structured, assessing the patients' strengths and needs and identifying what practical help they might need to get to the appointment for maintenance treatment. The control group received an appointment for maintenance treatment.

MEASURES

The primary outcome was treatment entry.

FINDINGS

Among patients who turned up for recruitment interview and randomization, the percentage of patients who started treatment was 95% in the intervention group and 94% in the control group. Treatment entry was unrelated to intervention status [unadjusted odds ratio (OR) = 0.92 (0.12–6.89), P = 1.00 and adjusted OR = 0.96 (0.12–7.83)].

CONCLUSIONS

A randomized controlled trial in a syringe exchange programme showed no evidence that a strength-based case management intervention improved attendance for treatment over referral alone. Attendance rates were high in both groups.

摘要

目的

注射器交换已被提议作为一种潜在的治疗药物依赖的途径,但在欧洲从未有过相关记录。主要目的是比较基于力量的个案管理干预(CMI)与仅转介的有效性,以促进注射器交换计划中治疗的参与。我们还评估了注射器交换计划将海洛因依赖患者转介到基于证据的美沙酮或丁丙诺啡(丁丙诺啡-纳洛酮)治疗的有效性。

设计

单站点,两组随机对照试验。

地点

瑞典马尔默的注射器交换计划和一个门诊诊所(研究治疗设施),用于维持治疗,位于医院区域外,由马尔默成瘾中心管理。

参与者

愿意参与的海洛因依赖患者(n = 75)被转介到维持治疗,并随机分为两组:一组接受基于力量的个案管理干预,旨在促进转介(n = 36),另一组仅接受转介(n = 39)。

干预措施

干预组接受维持治疗预约和针对个体患者需求的 CMI。CMI 是半结构化的,评估患者的优势和需求,并确定他们可能需要什么实际帮助才能预约接受维持治疗。对照组接受维持治疗预约。

测量

主要结果是治疗开始。

结果

在参加招募访谈和随机分组的患者中,开始治疗的患者比例为干预组 95%,对照组 94%。治疗开始与干预状态无关[未调整的优势比(OR)= 0.92(0.12-6.89),P = 1.00 和调整后的 OR = 0.96(0.12-7.83)]。

结论

在注射器交换计划中进行的一项随机对照试验表明,基于力量的个案管理干预并没有证据表明在治疗参与方面优于仅转介。两组的参与率都很高。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验