Tajaldin Bachir, Almilaji Khaled, Langton Paul, Sparrow Annie
Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY.
Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY.
Ann Glob Health. 2015 May-Jun;81(3):386-95. doi: 10.1016/j.aogh.2015.06.007.
By late 2012 the Global Polio Eradication Initiative (GPEI) had nearly eradicated this ancient infectious disease. Successful surveillance programs for acute flaccid paralysis however rely on broad governmental support for implementation. With the onset of conflict, public health breakdown has contributed to the resurgence of polio in a number of regions. The current laboratory based case definition may be a contributory factor in these regions.
We sought to compare case definition rates using strict laboratory based criteria to rates obtained using the clinical criteria in modern day Syria. We also sought to examine this distribution of cases by sub-region.
We examined the World Health Organization (WHO) reported figures for Syria from 2013-2014 using laboratory based criteria. We compared these with cases obtained when clinical criteria were applied. In addition we sought data from the opposition controlled Assistance Coordination Unit which operates in non-Government controlled areas where WHO data maybe incomplete. Cases were carefully examined for potential overlap to avoid double reporting.
Whilst the WHO data clearly confirmed the polio outbreak in Syria, it did so with considerable delay and with under reporting of cases, particularly from non-government controlled areas. In addition, laboratory based case definition led to a substantial underestimate of polio (36 cases) compared with those found with the clinically compatible definition (an additional 46 cases). Rates of adequate diagnostic specimens from suspected cases are well below target, no doubt reflecting the effect of conflict in these areas.
We have identified a gap in the surveillance of polio, a global threat. The current laboratory based definition, in the setting of conflict and insecurity, leads to under diagnosis of polio with potential delays and inadequacies in coordinating effective responses to contain outbreaks and eradicate polio. Breakdown in public health measures as a contributing factor is likely to result in a resurgence of previously controlled infectious diseases. The clinical definition should be reinstituted to supplement the lab-based definition.
到2012年末,全球根除脊髓灰质炎行动(GPEI)已几乎根除了这种古老的传染病。然而,成功的急性弛缓性麻痹监测项目依赖政府广泛支持以实施。随着冲突爆发,公共卫生体系崩溃导致脊髓灰质炎在一些地区卷土重来。当前基于实验室的病例定义可能是这些地区的一个促成因素。
我们试图比较在现代叙利亚使用严格的基于实验室的标准得出的病例定义率与使用临床标准得出的病例定义率。我们还试图按次区域检查病例的这种分布情况。
我们使用基于实验室的标准检查了世界卫生组织(WHO)报告的2013 - 2014年叙利亚的数据。我们将这些数据与应用临床标准时获得的病例进行比较。此外,我们从在非政府控制地区开展工作的反对派控制的援助协调股获取数据,因为在这些地区WHO的数据可能不完整。对病例进行仔细检查以避免潜在的重复报告。
虽然WHO的数据清楚地证实了叙利亚的脊髓灰质炎疫情,但报告出现了相当大的延迟,且病例报告不足,特别是来自非政府控制地区的病例。此外,与临床相符定义发现的病例(另外46例)相比,基于实验室的病例定义导致脊髓灰质炎病例被大幅低估(36例)。疑似病例的充分诊断标本率远低于目标,这无疑反映了这些地区冲突的影响。
我们发现了脊髓灰质炎监测方面的一个漏洞,这是一个全球威胁。在冲突和不安全的背景下,当前基于实验室的定义导致脊髓灰质炎诊断不足,可能会在协调有效应对措施以控制疫情和根除脊髓灰质炎方面出现延迟和不足。公共卫生措施的崩溃作为一个促成因素可能导致以前得到控制的传染病卷土重来。应重新采用临床定义以补充基于实验室的定义。