Caulfield Stuart, McDonald Kirsty A, Dawson Brian, Stearne Sarah M, Green Ben A, Rubenson Jonas, Clemons Tristan D, Peeling Peter
a School of Sport Science, Exercise and Health , The University of Western Australia , Crawley , Australia.
b Biomechanics Laboratory, Department of Kinesiology , Pennsylvania State University , University Park , PA , USA.
J Sports Sci. 2016 Aug;34(15):1485-90. doi: 10.1080/02640414.2015.1119300. Epub 2015 Nov 30.
This study examined the haemolytic effects of an interval-based running task in fore-foot and rear-foot striking runners. Nineteen male distance runners (10 fore-foot, 9 rear-foot) completed 8 × 3 min repeats at 90% vVO2peak on a motorised treadmill. Pre- and post-exercise venous blood samples were analysed for serum haptoglobin to quantify the haemolytic response to running. Vertical ground reaction forces were also captured via a force plate beneath the treadmill belt. Haptoglobin levels were significantly decreased following exercise (P = 0.001) in both groups (but not between groups), suggesting that the running task created a haemolytic stress. The ground reaction force data showed strong effect sizes for a greater peak force (d = 1.20) and impulse (d = 1.37) in fore-foot runners, and a greater rate of force development (d = 2.74) in rear-foot runners. The lack of difference in haptoglobin response between groups may be explained by the trend for fore-foot runners to experience greater peak force and impulse during the stance phase of their running gait, potentially negating any impact of the greater rate of force development occurring from the rear-foot runners' heel strike. Neither type of runner (fore-foot or rear-foot) appears more susceptible to technique-related foot-strike haemolysis.
本研究考察了基于间歇的跑步任务对前脚掌着地和后脚掌着地跑步者的溶血作用。19名男性长跑运动员(10名前脚掌着地,9名后脚掌着地)在电动跑步机上以90%的峰值摄氧量完成8组3分钟的重复跑。运动前后采集静脉血样,分析血清触珠蛋白以量化跑步后的溶血反应。同时通过跑步机皮带下方的测力板采集垂直地面反作用力。两组运动后触珠蛋白水平均显著降低(P = 0.001)(但两组之间无差异),表明跑步任务产生了溶血应激。地面反作用力数据显示,前脚掌着地跑步者的峰值力(d = 1.20)和冲量(d = 1.37)效应量较大,而后脚掌着地跑步者的力发展速率(d = 2.74)较大。两组之间触珠蛋白反应无差异,可能是因为前脚掌着地跑步者在跑步步态的支撑阶段往往会经历更大的峰值力和冲量,这可能抵消了后脚掌着地跑步者脚跟触地时力发展速率较大的影响。两种类型的跑步者(前脚掌着地或后脚掌着地)似乎都不会更易受与技术相关的脚掌着地溶血影响。