Cunillera Toni, Brignani Debora, Cucurell David, Fuentemilla Lluís, Miniussi Carlo
Department of Basic Psychology, University of Barcelona, 08035 Barcelona, Spain.
Cognitive Neuroscience Section, IRCCS Centro San Giovanni di Dio Fatebenefratelli, Brescia 25125, Italy.
Neuroimage. 2016 Oct 15;140:66-75. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2015.11.044. Epub 2015 Nov 24.
In any given common situation, when an individual controls him/herself or obeys and stops a current action when asked to do, it is because the brain executes an inhibitory process. This ability is essential for adaptive behaviour, and it is also a requirement for accurate performance in daily life. It has been suggested that there are two main inhibitory functions related to behaviour, as inhibition is observed to affect behaviour at different time intervals. Proactive inhibition permits the subject to control his behavioural response over time by creating a response tendency, while reactive inhibition is considered to be a process that usually inhibits an already initiated response. In this context, it has been established that inhibitory function is implemented by specific fronto-basal-ganglia circuits. In the present study, we investigated the role of the right inferior frontal cortex (rIFC) in response inhibition by combining into a single task the Go-NoGo task and the Stop-Signal task. Concurrently, we applied transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) over the IFC and recorded electroencephalography (EEG). Thus, we obtained online EEG measurements of the tDCS-induced modifications in the IFC together with the participant's performance in a response inhibition task. We found that applying bilateral tDCS on the IFC (right anodal/left cathodal) significantly increased proactive inhibition, although the behavioural parameters indicative of reactive inhibition were unaffected by the stimulation. Finally, the inhibitory-P3 component reflected a similar modulation under both inhibitory conditions induced by the stimulation. Our data indicates that an online tDCS-ERP approach is achievable, but that a tDCS bilateral montage may not be the most efficient one for modulating the rIFC.
在任何给定的常见情况下,当一个人能够自我控制,或者在被要求时服从并停止当前行为时,这是因为大脑执行了一个抑制过程。这种能力对于适应性行为至关重要,也是日常生活中准确表现的必要条件。有人提出,与行为相关的主要抑制功能有两种,因为观察到抑制在不同时间间隔影响行为。主动抑制使主体能够通过产生反应倾向来随时间控制其行为反应,而反应抑制被认为是一个通常抑制已启动反应的过程。在这种情况下,已经确定抑制功能是由特定的额底神经节回路实现的。在本研究中,我们通过将Go-NoGo任务和停止信号任务合并为一个单一任务,研究了右下额叶皮质(rIFC)在反应抑制中的作用。同时,我们在IFC上应用经颅直流电刺激(tDCS)并记录脑电图(EEG)。因此,我们获得了tDCS诱导的IFC变化的在线EEG测量结果以及参与者在反应抑制任务中的表现。我们发现,在IFC上施加双侧tDCS(右侧阳极/左侧阴极)显著增加了主动抑制,尽管指示反应抑制的行为参数不受刺激影响。最后,抑制性P3成分在刺激诱导的两种抑制条件下反映出类似的调制。我们的数据表明,在线tDCS-ERP方法是可行的,但tDCS双侧蒙太奇可能不是调节rIFC最有效的方法。