Abdul-Hussein Mustafa, Freeman Janice, Castell Donald
Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina.
Pharmacotherapy. 2015 Dec;35(12):1124-9. doi: 10.1002/phar.1665. Epub 2015 Dec 1.
Because it has been hypothesized that histamine2 receptor antagonists (H2 RAs) might interfere with the action of proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) when the drugs are given concomitantly, we sought to compare the pharmacodynamic effects of simultaneous administration of a PPI and an H2 RA with the effects of each drug administered alone.
Prospective, randomized, double-blind, three-way crossover study.
Esophageal motility laboratory at a large teaching hospital.
Twenty-one healthy volunteers.
Subjects were randomized to one of three treatment arms: an H2 RA (ranitidine 300 mg) plus placebo, a PPI (omeprazole 40 mg) plus placebo, or ranitidine 300 mg plus omeprazole 40 mg, all given once/day at 8 a.m., 30 minutes before a standard breakfast, for 1 week. The subjects then received the other two treatments, with each treatment period separated by a 1-week washout period.
The primary outcome was length of time that the gastric pH remained higher than 4. Secondary outcomes were median gastric pH higher than 4 and percentage of time that the gastric pH remained higher than 4. On day 7, ambulatory intragastric pH was recorded over an 8-hour period in each treatment arm. The combination of ranitidine and omeprazole resulted in a significantly longer time that the gastric pH remained higher than 4 (median 410.5 min [interquartile range (IQR) 298.5-454.25 min]) versus either omeprazole alone (median 356.7 min [IQR 254.9-419.2 min], p=0.023) or ranitidine alone (134.1 min [IQR 99.9-302.5 min], p<0.0001). Median gastric pH was also significantly higher when omeprazole and ranitidine were given in combination (pH 5.92 [IQR 4.75-6.46]) than either omeprazole alone (pH 4.88 [IQR 4.27-6.11], p=0.001) or ranitidine alone (pH 2.31 [IQR 2.04-5.27], p=0.0003). Likewise, the percentage of time that the gastric pH remained higher than 4 was significantly higher when omeprazole and ranitidine were given in combination (median 85.52%) than either omeprazole alone (74.31%, p=0.027) or ranitidine alone (27.94%, p=0.0002).
When a PPI and H2 RA were administered concomitantly 30 minutes before breakfast, the H2 RA did not decrease the acid suppressive ability of the PPI; rather, it improved gastric acid control. Thus these results failed to support the initial hypothesis of this study. Further prospective studies are needed to test these findings in patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease as well as those with erosive esophagitis.
由于有假说认为组胺2受体拮抗剂(H2RAs)与质子泵抑制剂(PPIs)同时给药时可能会干扰其作用,我们试图比较PPI与H2RA同时给药的药效学效应与单独使用每种药物的效应。
前瞻性、随机、双盲、三交叉研究。
一家大型教学医院的食管动力实验室。
21名健康志愿者。
受试者被随机分为三个治疗组之一:一种H2RA(雷尼替丁300毫克)加安慰剂、一种PPI(奥美拉唑40毫克)加安慰剂,或雷尼替丁300毫克加奥美拉唑40毫克,均于每天上午8点,在标准早餐前30分钟给药一次,持续1周。然后受试者接受其他两种治疗,每个治疗期之间有1周的洗脱期。
主要结局是胃pH值高于4的持续时间。次要结局是胃pH值高于4的中位数以及胃pH值高于4的时间百分比。在第7天,在每个治疗组中记录8小时的动态胃内pH值。雷尼替丁和奥美拉唑联合使用导致胃pH值高于4的时间显著延长(中位数410.5分钟[四分位间距(IQR)298.5 - 454.25分钟]),而单独使用奥美拉唑(中位数356.7分钟[IQR 254.9 - 419.2分钟],p = 0.023)或单独使用雷尼替丁(134.1分钟[IQR 99.9 - 302.5分钟],p < 0.0001)则不然。奥美拉唑和雷尼替丁联合使用时胃pH值中位数也显著更高(pH 5.92 [IQR 4.75 - 6.46]),高于单独使用奥美拉唑(pH 4.88 [IQR 4.27 - 6.11],p = 0.001)或单独使用雷尼替丁(pH 2.31 [IQR 2.04 - 5.27],p = 0.0003)。同样,奥美拉唑和雷尼替丁联合使用时胃pH值高于4的时间百分比显著更高(中位数85.52%),高于单独使用奥美拉唑(74.31%,p = 0.027)或单独使用雷尼替丁(27.94%,p = 0.0002)。
当在早餐前30分钟同时给予PPI和H2RA时,H2RA并未降低PPI的抑酸能力;相反,它改善了胃酸控制。因此,这些结果未能支持本研究的最初假设。需要进一步的前瞻性研究来在胃食管反流病患者以及糜烂性食管炎患者中验证这些发现。