成人糜烂性食管炎的药物治疗策略:叙述性综述

Drug treatment strategies for erosive esophagitis in adults: a narrative review.

作者信息

Shibli Fahmi, Mari Amir, Fass Ronnie

机构信息

Institute of Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Nutrition, Emek Medical Center, Afula, Israel.

Rappaport Faculty of Medicine, Technion-Israel Institute of Technology, Haifa, Israel.

出版信息

Transl Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2025 Jul 23;10:54. doi: 10.21037/tgh-24-168. eCollection 2025.

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

Erosive esophagitis (EE) is the second most common phenotype of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). While proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) are considered the mainstay treatment for healing and maintaining remission of EE, a significant proportion of patients, particularly those with advanced grades, fail to respond adequately. This review provides an updated overview of the current pharmacological treatment options for EE.

METHODS

An extensive electronic literature search was performed using PubMed database to identify relevant articles. The search included prospective clinical trials, observational trials, case-control studies, systematic reviews with or without meta-analysis, and narrative reviews describing pharmacological therapy for adult patients with EE. Articles were limited to English language publications. Search terms encompassed various treatment modalities including PPIs, potassium-competitive acid blockers (P-CABs), histamine 2 receptor antagonists (H2RAs), sucralfate, prokinetics, rebamipide and alginates.

KEY CONTENT AND FINDINGS

Research has shown varying effectiveness across different treatments for EE. While randomized controlled trials found alginates, sucralfate, and histamine-2 receptor antagonists to have limited healing efficacy, PPIs remain the most effective treatment, achieving healing rates of 75-95% after 8 weeks, though symptom resolution reaches about 60-85%. Among PPIs, esomeprazole shows slightly better healing outcomes compared to others. However, PPI effectiveness decreases in advanced EE cases [Los Angeles (LA) grades C/D], with healing rates dropping to 60-70%. More recently, P-CABs have demonstrated promising results, demonstrating healing rates non-inferior to PPIS but superior in patients with advanced EE or PPI-resistent EE. Given that most patients experience relapse upon discontinuation, maintaining PPI or PCAB therapy is crucial for preventing EE recurrence.

CONCLUSIONS

The future of EE management lies in a more personalized approach that takes into account disease severity, PPI response, and patient preferences. While PPIs remain the mainstay of treatment, P-CABs represent a promising new therapeutic option, particularly for severe and PPI-resistant cases. The addition of nighttime to bedtime H2RAs or use of double PPI dose may benefit refractory cases. Further studies are needed to directly compare PPIs and P-CABs in different EE grades and evaluate the value of adjunctive therapies.

摘要

背景与目的

糜烂性食管炎(EE)是胃食管反流病(GERD)的第二常见临床表现。虽然质子泵抑制剂(PPI)被认为是治愈和维持EE缓解的主要治疗方法,但相当一部分患者,尤其是病情较严重的患者,对治疗反应不佳。本综述提供了EE当前药物治疗选择的最新概述。

方法

使用PubMed数据库进行广泛的电子文献检索,以识别相关文章。检索包括前瞻性临床试验、观察性试验、病例对照研究、有或无荟萃分析的系统评价,以及描述成年EE患者药物治疗的叙述性综述。文章仅限于英文出版物。检索词涵盖了各种治疗方式,包括PPI、钾离子竞争性酸阻滞剂(P-CAB)、组胺2受体拮抗剂(H2RA)、硫糖铝、促动力药、瑞巴派特和藻酸盐。

关键内容与研究结果

研究表明,不同治疗方法对EE的疗效各不相同。虽然随机对照试验发现藻酸盐、硫糖铝和组胺2受体拮抗剂的愈合疗效有限,但PPI仍然是最有效的治疗方法,8周后愈合率达到75-95%,不过症状缓解率约为60-85%。在PPI中,埃索美拉唑的愈合效果略优于其他药物。然而,在晚期EE病例(洛杉矶(LA)分级C/D)中,PPI的疗效会降低,愈合率降至60-70%。最近,P-CAB已显示出有前景的结果,其愈合率不低于PPI,但在晚期EE或PPI抵抗性EE患者中更具优势。鉴于大多数患者在停药后会复发,维持PPI或PCAB治疗对于预防EE复发至关重要。

结论

EE管理的未来在于采用更个性化的方法,该方法需考虑疾病严重程度、PPI反应和患者偏好。虽然PPI仍然是主要治疗方法,但P-CAB是一种有前景的新治疗选择,尤其适用于严重和PPI抵抗性病例。在睡前加用夜间H2RA或使用双倍PPI剂量可能对难治性病例有益。需要进一步研究以直接比较不同EE分级中PPI和P-CAB的疗效,并评估辅助治疗的价值。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3fe8/12314673/3056130410d3/tgh-10-24-168-f1.jpg

相似文献

[6]
Proton pump inhibitors for functional dyspepsia.

Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017-11-21

[8]
Proton pump inhibitors for functional dyspepsia.

Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017-3-8

本文引用的文献

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索