Chen Jia, Zhu Wei, Zhang Zhenxiang, Zhu Lixian, Zhang Wenjie, DU Yaqing
Orthopedic Department, The Affiliated Taizhou People's Hospital of Nantong University, Taizhou, Jiangsu 225300, P.R. China.
Exp Ther Med. 2015 Aug;10(2):737-742. doi: 10.3892/etm.2015.2512. Epub 2015 May 22.
The aim of the present study was to determine whether celecoxib is able to ameliorate pain intensity, provide a narcotic-sparing effect, achieve early ambulation and improve rehabilitation following total hip arthroplasty (THA) in elderly patients. Peri- and post-operative oral celecoxib was administered to verify the efficacy of celecoxib for acute pain management in a multimodal analgesic strategy. All 64 eligible patients were randomly allocated to either the celecoxib group, who took an oral 400 mg capsule of celecoxib peri-operatively and 200 mg per 12 h post-operatively for the first 5 days, or the control group, who were orally treated with a placebo capsule having the same appearance. A multimodal analgesic technique was used in which oral celecoxib or placebo capsule was combined with intravenous patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) morphine pump for peri- and post-operative pain management. Pain assessments were recorded at 6, 12, 24, 48 and 72 h, and 7 and 14 days after THA using the visual analog scale (VAS). PCA morphine consumption; 6, 12, 24 and 48-h post-operative Harris hip score (HHS); time interval until initial ambulation; rates of urinary retention and post-operative nausea and vomiting (PONV) within 72 h; and intra- and post-operative blood loss were also documented. The celecoxib and control groups comprised 34 and 30 patients, respectively. Baseline demographics were comparable between the two groups. The post-operative VAS in the celecoxib group was significantly lower than that in the control group at 12, 24, 48 and 72 h after THA. The post-operative HHS had no significant difference between the two groups, while the time interval until initial ambulation in the celecoxib group (4.5±1.2 days) was significantly less than that in the control group (5.83±2.04 days; P<0.05). Morphine consumption was significantly decreased in the celecoxib group when compared with the control group at 6, 12, 24 and 24 h. Although the 72-h post-operative rates of urinary retention and PONV were lower in the celecoxib group than in the control group, there were no significant differences in these rates between the two groups. The intra- or post-operative blood loss was not significantly different between groups. In conclusion, pre-and post-operative oral celecoxib in a multimodal analgesic strategy can achieve favorable pain relief, reduce opioid consumption, and provide earlier ambulation and improved rehabilitation when compared with PCA morphine alone following THA in elderly patients.
本研究的目的是确定塞来昔布是否能够减轻老年患者全髋关节置换术(THA)后的疼痛强度、提供节省麻醉剂的效果、实现早期活动并改善康复情况。在围手术期和术后口服塞来昔布,以验证其在多模式镇痛策略中对急性疼痛管理的疗效。所有64例符合条件的患者被随机分配至塞来昔布组或对照组,塞来昔布组患者在围手术期口服400mg塞来昔布胶囊,术后前5天每12小时口服200mg;对照组口服外观相同的安慰剂胶囊。采用多模式镇痛技术,将口服塞来昔布或安慰剂胶囊与静脉自控镇痛(PCA)吗啡泵联合用于围手术期和术后疼痛管理。使用视觉模拟量表(VAS)在THA后6、12、24、48和72小时以及7天和14天记录疼痛评估结果。记录PCA吗啡消耗量、术后6、12、24和48小时的Harris髋关节评分(HHS)、首次活动的时间间隔以及72小时内的尿潴留率和术后恶心呕吐(PONV)发生率,以及术中及术后失血量。塞来昔布组和对照组分别有34例和30例患者。两组的基线人口统计学特征具有可比性。THA后12、24、48和72小时,塞来昔布组的术后VAS显著低于对照组。两组术后HHS无显著差异,而塞来昔布组首次活动的时间间隔(4.5±1.2天)显著短于对照组(5.83±2.04天;P<0.05)。与对照组相比,塞来昔布组在6、12、24和48小时时吗啡消耗量显著降低。虽然塞来昔布组术后72小时的尿潴留率和PONV发生率低于对照组,但两组在这些发生率上无显著差异。两组术中及术后失血量无显著差异。总之,与老年患者THA后单独使用PCA吗啡相比,在多模式镇痛策略中术前和术后口服塞来昔布可实现良好的疼痛缓解、减少阿片类药物消耗,并提供更早的活动能力和更好的康复效果。