Xu Min, Li Jianbin, Liu Shanshan, Wang Suzhen, Wang Wei, Li Fengxiang, Liu Tonghai, Yu Jinming
Shandong University School of Medicine, Jinan, Shandong, P.R. China ; Department of Radiation Oncology, Shandong Cancer Hospital and Institute, Jinan, Shandong, P.R. China.
Department of Radiation Oncology, Shandong Cancer Hospital and Institute, Jinan, Shandong, P.R. China.
Oncol Lett. 2015 Aug;10(2):625-630. doi: 10.3892/ol.2015.3358. Epub 2015 Jun 10.
The present study aimed to investigate an optimal and feasible method for delineating the target volume of glandular breast tissue following breast-conserving surgery. A total of 15 patients who underwent radiotherapy following breast-conserving surgery were recruited into the study. Clinical target volume was delineated by the following three methods based on computed tomography (CT): Anatomical landmarks (CTVan), breast palpation (CTVpa) and CT scan images (CTVgl). The target volume, degree of inclusion (DI) and conformal index (CI) defined by these methods were compared. The difference was significant between CTVan and CTVgl, and CTVpa and CTVgl (P<0.0001). The CI between CTVan and CTVpa was 0.644±0.122, significantly higher than that between CTVan and CTVgl (0.264±0.108; P<0.0001) or between CTVpa and CTVgl (0.328±0.115; P<0.0001). The DI of CTVpa in CTVan was 0.890±0.08 and the opposite was 0.709±0.144, while that of DI of CTVgl in CTVan or CTVpa was 0.994±0.005 and 0.989±0.008, respectively. The boundary difference between CTVan and CTVpa was 3.35±7.23, 5.57±13.37, 1.75±11.62 and 11.25±4.07 mm for the medial, lateral, cephalic and caudal boundaries, respectively. A significant difference was observed in the target volume of the breast defined by the three methods. The target volume defined by CTVgl was significantly smaller than that identified by the other two methods. Overall, the combination of palpation marks and anatomical landmarks to define the contouring scope of the breast was indicated to be a relatively rational method for delineating the target volume of the breast.
本研究旨在探讨一种优化且可行的方法,用于在保乳手术后勾勒乳腺腺体组织的靶区体积。共有15例保乳手术后接受放疗的患者纳入本研究。基于计算机断层扫描(CT),通过以下三种方法勾勒临床靶区体积:解剖标志(CTVan)、乳腺触诊(CTVpa)和CT扫描图像(CTVgl)。比较了这些方法所定义的靶区体积、包容度(DI)和适形指数(CI)。CTVan与CTVgl之间、CTVpa与CTVgl之间差异有统计学意义(P<0.0001)。CTVan与CTVpa之间的CI为0.644±0.122,显著高于CTVan与CTVgl之间(0.264±0.108;P<0.0001)或CTVpa与CTVgl之间(0.328±0.115;P<0.0001)。CTVpa在CTVan中的DI为0.890±0.08,反之则为0.709±0.144,而CTVgl在CTVan或CTVpa中的DI分别为0.994±0.005和0.989±0.008。CTVan与CTVpa在内侧、外侧、头侧和尾侧边界的边界差异分别为3.35±7.23、5.57±13.37、1.75±11.62和11.25±4.07mm。三种方法所定义的乳腺靶区体积存在显著差异。CTVgl所定义的靶区体积显著小于其他两种方法所确定的靶区体积。总体而言,触诊标记和解剖标志相结合来定义乳腺轮廓范围被认为是一种相对合理的勾勒乳腺靶区体积的方法。