• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

将标准化患者报告结局纳入骨科护理的可行性。

Feasibility of integrating standardized patient-reported outcomes in orthopedic care.

作者信息

Slover James D, Karia Raj J, Hauer Chelsie, Gelber Zachary, Band Philip A, Graham Jove

机构信息

New York University School of Medicine, New York, NY

出版信息

Am J Manag Care. 2015 Aug;21(8):e494-500.

PMID:26625504
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

Osteoarthritis of the knee is a chronic disease associated with pain and reduced quality of life. The ability to reliably measure patient-reported symptoms is important for clinical decision making and evaluation of outcomes. Electronic and web-based tools can eliminate much of the labor-intensive aspects of questionnaire administration and enables both real-time evaluation of responses by physicians and integration of data from multiple sites. This article describes the results of implementing a single integrated electronic questionnaire system into routine orthopedic practice at 2 diverse institutions.

STUDY DESIGN

Case study.

METHODS

A web-based version of a general quality-of-life questionnaire (EuroQol 5-dimension [EQ-5D]) and the pain domain of a disease-specific questionnaire (Knee Osteoarthritis Outcome Score [KOOS]) were administered in the office waiting room to (n = 666) patients at 2 centers over a 9-month period using touchscreen devices. Data were analyzed and descriptive statistics were calculated to assess feasibility of integration into the distinct work flows and to assess the agreement of the results.

RESULTS

The electronic questionnaire had a completion rate of 93% to 95%. Average questionnaire completion times were 3 to 5 minutes at each institution. Mean EQ-5D and KOOS scores for patients pre- and postsurgery were also consistent with prior literature studies.

CONCLUSIONS

Lessons learned for future adoption of questionnaire systems elsewhere include the need for baseline assessment of clinic work flows to identify the optimal point of administration and the need for IT support. This study demonstrates the feasibility of routinely collecting patient-reported data as part of standard care, which will become increasingly important as the nationwide emphasis on tracking quality and cost-effectiveness of treatments in orthopedics grows.

摘要

目的

膝关节骨关节炎是一种与疼痛和生活质量下降相关的慢性疾病。可靠地测量患者报告的症状的能力对于临床决策和结果评估很重要。电子和基于网络的工具可以消除问卷管理中许多劳动密集型的方面,并使医生能够实时评估回答,并整合来自多个地点的数据。本文描述了在两个不同机构将单一综合电子问卷系统应用于常规骨科实践的结果。

研究设计

案例研究。

方法

在9个月的时间里,在两个中心的办公室候诊室使用触摸屏设备,向666名患者发放了一份通用生活质量问卷(欧洲五维健康量表[EQ-5D])的网络版和一份疾病特异性问卷(膝关节骨关节炎结局评分[KOOS])的疼痛领域问卷。对数据进行分析并计算描述性统计量,以评估整合到不同工作流程中的可行性,并评估结果的一致性。

结果

电子问卷的完成率为93%至95%。每个机构的平均问卷完成时间为3至5分钟。患者术前和术后的EQ-5D和KOOS平均得分也与先前的文献研究一致。

结论

未来在其他地方采用问卷系统的经验教训包括需要对诊所工作流程进行基线评估,以确定最佳发放点,以及需要信息技术支持。这项研究证明了作为标准护理的一部分常规收集患者报告数据的可行性,随着全国范围内对骨科治疗质量和成本效益跟踪的重视程度不断提高,这将变得越来越重要。

相似文献

1
Feasibility of integrating standardized patient-reported outcomes in orthopedic care.将标准化患者报告结局纳入骨科护理的可行性。
Am J Manag Care. 2015 Aug;21(8):e494-500.
2
Implementation of Real-Time Assessment of Patient-Reported Outcomes in a Heart Failure Clinic: A Feasibility Study.实时评估心力衰竭患者报告结局在心力衰竭门诊中的实施:一项可行性研究。
J Card Fail. 2017 Nov;23(11):813-816. doi: 10.1016/j.cardfail.2017.09.009. Epub 2017 Oct 2.
3
Assessment of the minimum clinically important difference in pain, disability, and quality of life after anterior cervical discectomy and fusion: clinical article.颈椎前路椎间盘切除融合术后疼痛、残疾和生活质量的最小临床重要差异评估:临床文章。
J Neurosurg Spine. 2013 Feb;18(2):154-60. doi: 10.3171/2012.10.SPINE12312. Epub 2012 Nov 23.
4
Comparison of the EuroQOL-5D with the Oswestry Disability Index, back and leg pain scores in patients with degenerative lumbar spine pathology.比较 EuroQOL-5D 与 Oswestry 残疾指数、腰背腿痛评分在退行性腰椎病变患者中的应用。
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2013 Apr 20;38(9):757-61. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e31827ab803.
5
Building an electronic health record integrated quality of life outcomes registry for spine surgery.建立一个用于脊柱手术的整合生活质量结果的电子健康记录登记系统。
J Neurosurg Spine. 2016 Jan;24(1):176-85. doi: 10.3171/2015.3.SPINE141127. Epub 2015 Oct 2.
6
Efficacy and safety of low-dose transdermal buprenorphine patches (5, 10, and 20 microg/h) versus prolonged-release tramadol tablets (75, 100, 150, and 200 mg) in patients with chronic osteoarthritis pain: a 12-week, randomized, open-label, controlled, parallel-group noninferiority study.低剂量经皮丁丙诺啡贴剂(5、10和20微克/小时)与缓释曲马多片(75、100、150和200毫克)治疗慢性骨关节炎疼痛患者的疗效和安全性:一项为期12周的随机、开放标签、对照、平行组非劣效性研究。
Clin Ther. 2009 Mar;31(3):503-13. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2009.03.001.
7
Cost and quality of life outcome analysis of postoperative infections after subaxial dorsal cervical fusions.下颈椎后路融合术后感染的成本及生活质量结果分析
J Neurosurg Spine. 2015 Apr;22(4):381-6. doi: 10.3171/2014.10.SPINE14228. Epub 2015 Jan 23.
8
Comparison of the EuroQol and short form 6D in Singapore multiethnic Asian knee osteoarthritis patients scheduled for total knee replacement.新加坡计划进行全膝关节置换术的多民族亚洲膝骨关节炎患者中欧洲五维健康量表与简版6D量表的比较
Arthritis Rheum. 2007 Aug 15;57(6):1043-9. doi: 10.1002/art.22883.
9
Determining the quality and effectiveness of surgical spine care: patient satisfaction is not a valid proxy.评估脊柱外科手术质量和效果:患者满意度不能作为有效替代指标。
Spine J. 2013 Sep;13(9):1006-12. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2013.04.008. Epub 2013 May 16.
10
Does quality of life of COPD patients as measured by the generic EuroQol five-dimension questionnaire differentiate between COPD severity stages?采用通用的欧洲五维健康量表问卷测量的慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)患者的生活质量能否区分COPD的严重程度阶段?
Chest. 2006 Oct;130(4):1117-28. doi: 10.1378/chest.130.4.1117.

引用本文的文献

1
Clinical Setting Does Not Impact Baseline Patient Reported Outcomes Measures in Patients Undergoing Anterior Cervical Diskectomy and Fusion: A Prospective Study.临床环境不影响接受颈椎前路椎间盘切除融合术患者的基线患者报告结局指标:一项前瞻性研究。
J Clin Med. 2025 Aug 19;14(16):5852. doi: 10.3390/jcm14165852.
2
Feasibility of a Web-Based and Mobile-Supported Follow-Up Treatment Pathway for Adult Patients With Orthopedic Trauma in the Netherlands: Concurrent Mixed Methods Study.荷兰成人骨科创伤患者基于网络和移动支持的后续治疗途径的可行性:同步混合方法研究
JMIR Form Res. 2024 Nov 26;8:e57579. doi: 10.2196/57579.
3
Young or Old Age and Non-White Race Are Associated With Poor Patient-Reported Outcome Measure Response Compliance After Orthopaedic Surgery.
年轻或年老以及非白人种族与骨科手术后患者报告的结局测量反应依从性差有关。
Arthrosc Sports Med Rehabil. 2023 Nov 11;5(6):100817. doi: 10.1016/j.asmr.2023.100817. eCollection 2023 Dec.
4
Quality of total hip arthroplasty health care based on four years of patient-reported outcomes in the Netherlands.荷兰基于四年患者报告结局的全髋关节置换医疗质量。
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2023 Mar 14;21(1):24. doi: 10.1186/s12955-023-02104-2.
5
Are Surgeons' Tendencies to Avoid Discomfort Associated with Attitudes and Beliefs Toward Patient Psychosocial Factors?外科医生避免与患者心理社会因素的态度和信念相关的不适感的倾向是怎样的?
Arch Bone Jt Surg. 2022 Jul;10(7):611-620. doi: 10.22038/ABJS.2022.55134.2745.
6
Patient-Reported Outcomes in Foot and Ankle Orthopedics.足踝矫形外科学中的患者报告结局
Foot Ankle Orthop. 2019 Jul 19;4(3):2473011419852930. doi: 10.1177/2473011419852930. eCollection 2019 Jul.
7
Personalized outcomes for hip and knee replacement: the patients point of view.髋关节和膝关节置换的个性化结果:患者视角
J Patient Rep Outcomes. 2021 Nov 4;5(1):116. doi: 10.1186/s41687-021-00393-z.
8
Collection of the International Hip Outcome Tool-12 Using a Smartphone Application Format Is Faster and Preferred When Compared With the Paper Version: A Pilot Study of rHip.与纸质版相比,使用智能手机应用程序格式收集国际髋关节结局工具-12更快且更受青睐:一项rHip的初步研究
Arthrosc Sports Med Rehabil. 2021 Aug 19;3(5):e1401-e1405. doi: 10.1016/j.asmr.2021.06.010. eCollection 2021 Oct.
9
Equal care for all? Do surgical outcomes in shoulder arthroplasty depend on insurance type?对所有人一视同仁?肩关节置换术的手术结果是否取决于保险类型?
JSES Int. 2021 Mar 9;5(5):900-904. doi: 10.1016/j.jseint.2021.01.001. eCollection 2021 Sep.
10
Electronic health record-integrated approach for collection of patient-reported outcome measures: a retrospective evaluation.电子健康记录整合方法收集患者报告的结局测量指标:回顾性评估。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2021 Jun 30;21(1):626. doi: 10.1186/s12913-021-06626-7.