• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

荷兰基于四年患者报告结局的全髋关节置换医疗质量。

Quality of total hip arthroplasty health care based on four years of patient-reported outcomes in the Netherlands.

机构信息

Research Department, Kliniek ViaSana, Hoogveldseweg 1, 5451 AA, Mill, The Netherlands.

Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Sports & Orthopaedics Research Centre, Sint Anna Ziekenhuis, Bogardeind 2, 5664 EH, Geldrop, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2023 Mar 14;21(1):24. doi: 10.1186/s12955-023-02104-2.

DOI:10.1186/s12955-023-02104-2
PMID:36918879
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10011788/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Joint arthroplasty registries have incorporated patient-reported outcomes (PROs) to evaluate outcomes from a patients' perspective to improve total hip arthroplasty (THA). To draw valid conclusions on PROs, a minimum response rate (RR) of 60% is advised. This study investigated (1) if the quality of THA health care based on PROs improved over the years in the Netherlands, (2) if RRs improved over the years, and (3) difference in PROs over the years in hospitals with RR ≥ 60% compared to RR < 60%.

METHODS

Longitudinal study with publicly available datasets from 2016 to 2019. Primary outcome was increase/decrease in PRO change scores including 95%CI ranges over the years between preoperatively and 3 months postoperatively (pre-3 m), and 12 months postoperatively (pre-12 m). Improved quality of health care was arbitrary defined as when ≥ 3 of 4 included scores or ranges were statistically significant improved. Secondary outcome was increase/decrease in RRs over the years. Subgroups RR ≥ 60% and RR < 60% were compared.

RESULTS

Hospitals (%) collecting THA PROs increased from 78 to 92%. EQ VAS change score increased over the years, and 95%CI ranges of EQ VAS, EQ-5D descriptive system and NRS pain during activity decreased over the years at pre-3 m (p < 0.05). All THA pre-12 m PRO change scores and 95%CI ranges remained equal (p > 0.05). Pre-3 m RR remained equal (around 43%, p = 0.107) and pre-12 m RR decreased 9% (49% to 40%, p = 0.008). Pre-3 m subgroup RR ≥ 60% was too small to analyse (5%). No difference was found between pre-12 m subgroups (RR ≥ 60% = 16%), p > 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Quality of THA health care based on PROs seems equal in the Netherlands between 2016 and 2019. Although more hospitals participated in PRO collection, low RRs with large IQRs are observed and only 16% of the hospitals achieved the advised RR ≥ 60%. Multiple recommendations are provided to improve PRO collection and use.

摘要

背景

关节置换登记处已经纳入了患者报告的结果(PROs),从患者的角度评估髋关节置换术(THA)的结果,以改善治疗效果。为了得出有效的 PRO 结论,建议最低应答率(RR)为 60%。本研究调查了:(1)基于 PRO 的荷兰 THA 医疗保健质量是否逐年提高;(2)RR 是否逐年提高;(3)RR≥60%的医院与 RR<60%的医院相比,PRO 多年来的差异。

方法

使用 2016 年至 2019 年的公开数据集进行纵向研究。主要结局是术前和术后 3 个月(pre-3m)以及术后 12 个月(pre-12m)PRO 变化评分的增加/减少,包括 95%CI 范围。任意定义的医疗保健质量改善是指 4 项纳入评分或范围中≥3 项有统计学意义的改善。次要结局是 RR 逐年增加。比较 RR≥60%和 RR<60%的亚组。

结果

收集 THA PRO 的医院比例从 78%增加到 92%。EQ VAS 变化评分逐年增加,EQ VAS、EQ-5D 描述系统和活动时 NRS 疼痛的 95%CI 范围在 pre-3m 时逐年降低(p<0.05)。所有 THA pre-12m PRO 变化评分和 95%CI 范围均保持不变(p>0.05)。pre-3m RR 保持不变(约 43%,p=0.107),pre-12m RR 降低了 9%(49%至 40%,p=0.008)。pre-3m 亚组 RR≥60%的比例太小,无法进行分析(5%)。pre-12m 亚组之间未发现差异(RR≥60%=16%,p>0.05)。

结论

2016 年至 2019 年间,荷兰基于 PRO 的 THA 医疗保健质量似乎相同。尽管有更多的医院参与了 PRO 的收集,但观察到的 RR 较低且 IQR 较大,只有 16%的医院达到了建议的 RR≥60%。为了改善 PRO 的收集和使用,提供了多项建议。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2f50/10012439/64e344ead41c/12955_2023_2104_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2f50/10012439/df0700f975ea/12955_2023_2104_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2f50/10012439/64e344ead41c/12955_2023_2104_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2f50/10012439/df0700f975ea/12955_2023_2104_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2f50/10012439/64e344ead41c/12955_2023_2104_Fig2_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Quality of total hip arthroplasty health care based on four years of patient-reported outcomes in the Netherlands.荷兰基于四年患者报告结局的全髋关节置换医疗质量。
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2023 Mar 14;21(1):24. doi: 10.1186/s12955-023-02104-2.
2
What is the minimum response rate on patient-reported outcome measures needed to adequately evaluate total hip arthroplasties?需要多少例患者报告的结局测量指标的最低应答率,才能充分评估全髋关节置换术?
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2020 Dec 2;18(1):379. doi: 10.1186/s12955-020-01628-1.
3
Patient reported outcomes in hip arthroplasty registries.髋关节置换登记系统中的患者报告结局
Dan Med J. 2014 May;61(5):B4845.
4
How do Patient-reported Outcome Scores in International Hip and Knee Arthroplasty Registries Compare?国际髋关节和膝关节置换登记处的患者报告结局评分如何比较?
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2022 Oct 1;480(10):1884-1896. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000002306. Epub 2022 Jul 8.
5
The Effect of Waiting for a Primary Total Hip Arthroplasty on the Overall Hip Function and Quality of Life.等待初次全髋关节置换术对全髋关节功能和生活质量的影响。
J Arthroplasty. 2024 Apr;39(4):974-978.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2023.10.013. Epub 2023 Oct 18.
6
Outcomes of different bearings in total hip arthroplasty - implant survival, revision causes, and patient-reported outcome.全髋关节置换术中不同轴承的结果——植入物存活率、翻修原因及患者报告的结果。
Dan Med J. 2017 Mar;64(3).
7
Minimal clinically important improvement (MCII) and patient-acceptable symptom state (PASS) in total hip arthroplasty (THA) patients 1 year postoperatively.全髋关节置换术(THA)患者术后 1 年的最小临床重要改善(MCII)和可接受的患者症状状态(PASS)。
Acta Orthop. 2014 Feb;85(1):39-48. doi: 10.3109/17453674.2013.867782. Epub 2013 Nov 29.
8
Does surgeon experience affect patient-reported outcomes 1 year after primary total hip arthroplasty?外科医生经验是否会影响初次全髋关节置换术后 1 年的患者报告结局?
Acta Orthop. 2018 Jun;89(3):265-271. doi: 10.1080/17453674.2018.1444300. Epub 2018 Mar 6.
9
Which patients improve most after total hip arthroplasty? Influence of patient characteristics on patient-reported outcome measures of 22,357 total hip arthroplasties in the Dutch Arthroplasty Register.哪些患者在全髋关节置换术后改善最大?荷兰关节置换登记处 22357 例全髋关节置换术后患者报告的结局测量指标中患者特征的影响。
Hip Int. 2021 Sep;31(5):593-602. doi: 10.1177/1120700020913208. Epub 2020 Apr 14.
10
Standard Comorbidity Measures Do Not Predict Patient-reported Outcomes 1 Year After Total Hip Arthroplasty.标准合并症测量方法无法预测全髋关节置换术后1年患者报告的结局。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2015 Nov;473(11):3370-9. doi: 10.1007/s11999-015-4195-z.

引用本文的文献

1
Effectiveness of total hip arthroplasty versus non-surgery on patient-reported hip function at 3 months: a target trial emulation study of patients with osteoarthritis.全髋关节置换术与非手术治疗对患者报告的3个月时髋关节功能的有效性:一项骨关节炎患者的目标试验模拟研究
Acta Orthop. 2025 Apr 14;96:310-316. doi: 10.2340/17453674.2025.43332.

本文引用的文献

1
What Do Orthopaedists Believe is Needed for Incorporating Patient-reported Outcome Measures into Clinical Care? A Qualitative Study.骨科医生认为将患者报告的结局指标纳入临床护理需要什么?一项定性研究。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2022 Apr 1;480(4):680-687. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000002059.
2
Collection and Reporting of Patient-reported Outcome Measures in Arthroplasty Registries: Multinational Survey and Recommendations.关节置换登记处中患者报告的结局测量数据的采集和报告:多国调查和建议。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2021 Oct 1;479(10):2151-2166. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000001852.
3
Use of patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) by orthopedic surgeons in Saudi Arabia.
沙特阿拉伯矫形外科医生对患者报告结局测量(PROMs)的使用情况。
J Orthop Surg Res. 2020 Dec 10;15(1):598. doi: 10.1186/s13018-020-02135-1.
4
What is the minimum response rate on patient-reported outcome measures needed to adequately evaluate total hip arthroplasties?需要多少例患者报告的结局测量指标的最低应答率,才能充分评估全髋关节置换术?
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2020 Dec 2;18(1):379. doi: 10.1186/s12955-020-01628-1.
5
Awareness of performance on outcomes after total hip and knee arthroplasty among Dutch orthopedic surgeons: how to improve feedback from arthroplasty registries.荷兰骨科医生对全髋关节和膝关节置换术后结果表现的认知:如何改善关节置换登记处的反馈。
Acta Orthop. 2021 Feb;92(1):54-61. doi: 10.1080/17453674.2020.1827523. Epub 2020 Oct 6.
6
Systematic review and meta-analysis of measurement properties of the Hip disability and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score - Physical Function Shortform (HOOS-PS) and the Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score - Physical Function Shortform (KOOS-PS).系统评价和荟萃分析髋关节残疾和骨关节炎结局评分 - 物理功能简表(HOOS-PS)和膝关节损伤和骨关节炎结局评分 - 物理功能简表(KOOS-PS)的测量特性。
Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2020 Dec;28(12):1525-1538. doi: 10.1016/j.joca.2020.08.004. Epub 2020 Aug 19.
7
Review of response rates over time in registry-based studies using patient-reported outcome measures.基于患者报告结局测量的注册研究中反应率随时间变化的回顾。
BMJ Open. 2020 Aug 6;10(8):e030808. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-030808.
8
The Surgeon's Perceived Value of Patient-reported Outcome Measures (PROMs): An Exploratory Qualitative Study of 5 Different Surgical Subspecialties.外科医生对患者报告的结局测量(PROMs)的感知价值:对 5 种不同外科亚专科的探索性定性研究。
Ann Surg. 2022 Mar 1;275(3):500-505. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000004253.
9
The use of PROMs and shared decision-making in medical encounters with patients: An opportunity to deliver value-based health care to patients.在与患者的医疗接触中使用患者报告结局测量指标(PROMs)和共同决策:为患者提供基于价值的医疗服务的契机。
J Eval Clin Pract. 2020 Apr;26(2):524-540. doi: 10.1111/jep.13321. Epub 2019 Dec 15.
10
Improving the response rate of patient-reported outcome measures in an Australian tertiary metropolitan hospital.提高澳大利亚一家大都市三级医院患者报告结局指标的响应率。
Patient Relat Outcome Meas. 2019 Jul 10;10:217-226. doi: 10.2147/PROM.S162476. eCollection 2019.