Suppr超能文献

以患者为导向的基于互联网的医学图像交换:多中心初步实施的经验

Patient-directed Internet-based Medical Image Exchange: Experience from an Initial Multicenter Implementation.

作者信息

Greco Giampaolo, Patel Anand S, Lewis Sara C, Shi Wei, Rasul Rehana, Torosyan Mary, Erickson Bradley J, Hiremath Atheeth, Moskowitz Alan J, Tellis Wyatt M, Siegel Eliot L, Arenson Ronald L, Mendelson David S

机构信息

Department of Population Health Sciences and Policy, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, One Gustave Levy Place, New York, NY 10029.

Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, University of California, San Francisco (UCSF), San Francisco, California 94107.

出版信息

Acad Radiol. 2016 Feb;23(2):237-44. doi: 10.1016/j.acra.2015.10.012. Epub 2015 Nov 25.

Abstract

RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES

Inefficient transfer of personal health records among providers negatively impacts quality of health care and increases cost. This multicenter study evaluates the implementation of the first Internet-based image-sharing system that gives patients ownership and control of their imaging exams, including assessment of patient satisfaction.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Patients receiving any medical imaging exams in four academic centers were eligible to have images uploaded into an online, Internet-based personal health record. Satisfaction surveys were provided during recruitment with questions on ease of use, privacy and security, and timeliness of access to images. Responses were rated on a five-point scale and compared using logistic regression and McNemar's test.

RESULTS

A total of 2562 patients enrolled from July 2012 to August 2013. The median number of imaging exams uploaded per patient was 5. Most commonly, exams were plain X-rays (34.7%), computed tomography (25.7%), and magnetic resonance imaging (16.1%). Of 502 (19.6%) patient surveys returned, 448 indicated the method of image sharing (Internet, compact discs [CDs], both, other). Nearly all patients (96.5%) responded favorably to having direct access to images, and 78% reported viewing their medical images independently. There was no difference between Internet and CD users in satisfaction with privacy and security and timeliness of access to medical images. A greater percentage of Internet users compared to CD users reported access without difficulty (88.3% vs. 77.5%, P < 0.0001).

CONCLUSION

A patient-directed, interoperable, Internet-based image-sharing system is feasible and surpasses the use of CDs with respect to accessibility of imaging exams while generating similar satisfaction with respect to privacy.

摘要

原理与目的

医疗服务提供者之间个人健康记录的低效传递对医疗质量产生负面影响并增加成本。这项多中心研究评估了首个基于互联网的图像共享系统的实施情况,该系统赋予患者对其影像检查的所有权和控制权,包括对患者满意度的评估。

材料与方法

在四个学术中心接受任何医学影像检查的患者有资格将图像上传到基于互联网的在线个人健康记录中。在招募过程中提供了满意度调查,问题涉及易用性、隐私和安全性以及获取图像的及时性。回答按五分制评分,并使用逻辑回归和 McNemar 检验进行比较。

结果

2012 年 7 月至 2013 年 8 月共有 2562 名患者入组。每位患者上传的影像检查中位数为 5 次。最常见的检查是普通 X 光(34.7%)、计算机断层扫描(25.7%)和磁共振成像(16.1%)。在回收的 502 份(19.6%)患者调查问卷中,448 份指出了图像共享方式(互联网、光盘[CD]、两者都用、其他)。几乎所有患者(96.5%)对能够直接获取图像给予肯定回应,78%的患者报告独立查看了自己的医学图像。互联网用户和 CD 用户在对隐私和安全性以及获取医学图像的及时性的满意度方面没有差异。与 CD 用户相比,报告获取图像没有困难的互联网用户比例更高(88.3%对 77.5%,P < 0.0001)。

结论

以患者为导向、可互操作的基于互联网的图像共享系统是可行的,在影像检查的可及性方面优于使用 CD,同时在隐私方面产生类似的满意度。

相似文献

1
Patient-directed Internet-based Medical Image Exchange: Experience from an Initial Multicenter Implementation.
Acad Radiol. 2016 Feb;23(2):237-44. doi: 10.1016/j.acra.2015.10.012. Epub 2015 Nov 25.
2
Patient-controlled sharing of medical imaging data across unaffiliated healthcare organizations.
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2013 Jan 1;20(1):157-63. doi: 10.1136/amiajnl-2012-001146. Epub 2012 Aug 11.
3
Distributed clinical data sharing via dynamic access-control policy transformation.
Int J Med Inform. 2016 May;89:25-31. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2016.02.002. Epub 2016 Feb 12.
5
Security and Privacy of Online Record Access: A Survey of Adolescents' Views and Experiences in Sweden.
J Adolesc Health. 2024 Nov;75(5):730-736. doi: 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2023.12.027. Epub 2024 Feb 12.
6
Findings from 2017 on Consumer Health Informatics and Education: Health Data Access and Sharing.
Yearb Med Inform. 2018 Aug;27(1):163-169. doi: 10.1055/s-0038-1641218. Epub 2018 Aug 29.
7
Online access to doctors' notes: patient concerns about privacy.
J Med Internet Res. 2013 Sep 26;15(9):e208. doi: 10.2196/jmir.2670.
8
The RSNA ImageShare - Enabling Secure, Transparent, and Easy Image Exchange.
J Digit Imaging. 2022 Aug;35(4):739-742. doi: 10.1007/s10278-021-00537-z. Epub 2022 Aug 22.
10
The Australian general public's perceptions of having a personally controlled electronic health record (PCEHR).
Int J Med Inform. 2014 Dec;83(12):889-900. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2014.08.002. Epub 2014 Aug 15.

引用本文的文献

1
The RSNA ImageShare - Enabling Secure, Transparent, and Easy Image Exchange.
J Digit Imaging. 2022 Aug;35(4):739-742. doi: 10.1007/s10278-021-00537-z. Epub 2022 Aug 22.
2
How Image Exchange Breaks Down: the Image Library Perspective.
J Digit Imaging. 2022 Aug;35(4):785-795. doi: 10.1007/s10278-022-00684-x. Epub 2022 Aug 1.
3
Multi-institutional Experience with Patient Image Access Through Electronic Health Record Patient Portals.
J Digit Imaging. 2022 Apr;35(2):320-326. doi: 10.1007/s10278-021-00565-9. Epub 2022 Jan 12.
4
Radiology, Mobile Devices, and Internet of Things (IoT).
J Digit Imaging. 2020 Jun;33(3):735-746. doi: 10.1007/s10278-019-00311-2.
5
The Enterprise Imaging Value Proposition.
J Digit Imaging. 2020 Feb;33(1):37-48. doi: 10.1007/s10278-019-00293-1.
6
Patient Attitudes About Viewing Their Radiology Images Online: Preintervention Survey.
J Med Internet Res. 2019 Jul 18;21(7):e12595. doi: 10.2196/12595.
7
Data Engineering for Machine Learning in Women's Imaging and Beyond.
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2019 Jul;213(1):216-226. doi: 10.2214/AJR.18.20464. Epub 2019 Feb 19.

本文引用的文献

1
The RSNA Image Sharing Network.
J Digit Imaging. 2015 Feb;28(1):53-61. doi: 10.1007/s10278-014-9714-z.
2
Burden on university hospitals of handling portable data for imaging (PDI) media.
Appl Clin Inform. 2014 Jan 15;5(1):46-57. doi: 10.4338/ACI-2013-07-RA-0052. eCollection 2014.
3
Imaging informatics: essential tools for the delivery of imaging services.
Acad Radiol. 2013 Oct;20(10):1195-212. doi: 10.1016/j.acra.2013.07.006.
4
Patient-controlled sharing of medical imaging data across unaffiliated healthcare organizations.
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2013 Jan 1;20(1):157-63. doi: 10.1136/amiajnl-2012-001146. Epub 2012 Aug 11.
5
Health-information exchange: why are we doing it, and what are we doing?
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2011 Sep-Oct;18(5):678-82. doi: 10.1136/amiajnl-2010-000021. Epub 2011 Jun 14.
6
User perspectives on the usability of a regional health information exchange.
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2011 Sep-Oct;18(5):711-6. doi: 10.1136/amiajnl-2011-000281. Epub 2011 May 27.
7
The digital divide in adoption and use of a personal health record.
Arch Intern Med. 2011 Mar 28;171(6):568-74. doi: 10.1001/archinternmed.2011.34.
8
Experience with importation of electronic images into the medical record from physical media.
J Digit Imaging. 2011 Aug;24(4):694-9. doi: 10.1007/s10278-011-9364-3.
10
The "meaningful use" regulation for electronic health records.
N Engl J Med. 2010 Aug 5;363(6):501-4. doi: 10.1056/NEJMp1006114. Epub 2010 Jul 13.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验