Suppr超能文献

在线获取医生记录:患者对隐私的担忧。

Online access to doctors' notes: patient concerns about privacy.

作者信息

Vodicka Elisabeth, Mejilla Roanne, Leveille Suzanne G, Ralston James D, Darer Jonathan D, Delbanco Tom, Walker Jan, Elmore Joann G

机构信息

Harborview Medical Center, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, WA 98104, USA.

出版信息

J Med Internet Res. 2013 Sep 26;15(9):e208. doi: 10.2196/jmir.2670.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Offering patients online access to medical records, including doctors' visit notes, holds considerable potential to improve care. However, patients may worry about loss of privacy when accessing personal health information through Internet-based patient portals. The OpenNotes study provided patients at three US health care institutions with online access to their primary care doctors' notes and then collected survey data about their experiences, including their concerns about privacy before and after participation in the intervention.

OBJECTIVE

To identify patients' attitudes toward privacy when given electronic access to their medical records, including visit notes.

METHODS

The design used a nested cohort study of patients surveyed at baseline and after a 1-year period during which they were invited to read their visit notes through secure patient portals. Participants consisted of 3874 primary care patients from Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center (Boston, MA), Geisinger Health System (Danville, PA), and Harborview Medical Center (Seattle, WA) who completed surveys before and after the OpenNotes intervention. The measures were patient-reported levels of concern regarding privacy associated with online access to visit notes.

RESULTS

32.91% of patients (1275/3874 respondents) reported concerns about privacy at baseline versus 36.63% (1419/3874 respondents) post-intervention. Baseline concerns were associated with non-white race/ethnicity and lower confidence in communicating with doctors, but were not associated with choosing to read notes or desire for continued online access post-intervention (nearly all patients with notes available chose to read them and wanted continued access). While the level of concern among most participants did not change during the intervention, 15.54% (602/3874 respondents, excluding participants who responded "don't know") reported more concern post-intervention, and 12.73% (493/3874 respondents, excluding participants who responded "don't know") reported less concern.

CONCLUSIONS

When considering online access to visit notes, approximately one-third of patients had concerns about privacy at baseline and post-intervention. These perceptions did not deter participants from accessing their notes, suggesting that the benefits of online access to medical records may outweigh patients' perceived risks to privacy.

摘要

背景

为患者提供在线访问病历(包括医生的就诊记录)具有改善医疗护理的巨大潜力。然而,患者通过基于互联网的患者门户访问个人健康信息时可能会担心隐私泄露。“开放病历”研究为美国三家医疗机构的患者提供了在线访问其初级保健医生记录的权限,然后收集了有关他们体验的调查数据,包括参与干预前后他们对隐私的担忧。

目的

确定患者在获得电子访问其病历(包括就诊记录)时对隐私的态度。

方法

该设计采用嵌套队列研究,在基线时以及在为期1年的时间段后对患者进行调查,在此期间邀请他们通过安全的患者门户阅读其就诊记录。参与者包括来自贝斯以色列女执事医疗中心(马萨诸塞州波士顿)、盖辛格医疗系统(宾夕法尼亚州丹维尔)和哈博维尤医疗中心(华盛顿州西雅图)的3874名初级保健患者,他们在“开放病历”干预前后完成了调查。测量指标是患者报告的与在线访问就诊记录相关的隐私担忧程度。

结果

32.91%的患者(1275/3874名受访者)在基线时报告了对隐私的担忧,干预后这一比例为36.63%(1419/3874名受访者)。基线时的担忧与非白人种族/族裔以及与医生沟通的信心较低有关,但与干预后选择阅读记录或希望继续在线访问无关(几乎所有可获取记录的患者都选择阅读并希望继续访问)。虽然大多数参与者在干预期间的担忧程度没有变化,但15.54%(602/3874名受访者,不包括回答“不知道”的参与者)报告干预后担忧增加,12.73%(493/3874名受访者,不包括回答“不知道”的参与者)报告担忧减少。

结论

在考虑在线访问就诊记录时,约三分之一的患者在基线和干预后都对隐私存在担忧。这些看法并未阻止参与者访问其记录,这表明在线访问病历的好处可能超过患者对隐私的感知风险。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cc5c/3785972/4be4c6e9838a/jmir_v15i9e208_fig1.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验