Rault Jean-Loup, Cree Shelby, Hemsworth Paul
Animal Welfare Science Centre, Faculty of Veterinary and Agricultural Sciences, University of Melbourne, Parkville VIC 3010, Australia
Animal Welfare Science Centre, Faculty of Veterinary and Agricultural Sciences, University of Melbourne, Parkville VIC 3010, Australia.
Poult Sci. 2016 Mar;95(3):473-81. doi: 10.3382/ps/pev337. Epub 2015 Dec 1.
Freedom from thirst is one of the most undeniable welfare requirements. Nevertheless, the welfare implication of water deprivation because of a particular situation (e.g., transport) or as an involuntary consequence (e.g., sick, injured, or subordinate animals) remains unclear. This experiment investigated the behavioral changes in laying hens following various durations of water deprivation by using a motivation test based on passing through a narrow, vertical gap to access water. Twenty laying hens were subjected to water deprivation for various durations (0, 12, 18, 24, or 32 h) and the cost of access was varied by changing the width of the vertical gap (150, 135, 120, or 100 mm) to access the water side of the testing cage. An incomplete randomized block design was used with two tests per hen per wk for 5 wk. The testing apparatus was identical to their home cage but with two cages connected through an adjustable vertical gap and a drinker on the other side. Hens spent more time in the control side rather than the water side at 100 mm compared to 120 mm (P = 0.03). The hens' willingness to pass through a narrow vertical gap in order to access water did not vary according to the duration of water deprivation. Nonetheless, water-deprivation duration had a marked effect on the hens' location and behavior. Hens spent more time in the vicinity of the drinker at 18, 24, and 32 h compared to 0 and 12 h (P < 0.05). Hens spent more time drinking at 24 h and 32 h, followed by 18, 12, and finally 0 h (P < 0.05). Drinking latency and frequency were higher for all water-deprivation durations as compared to the 0 h control (P < 0.05). Water deprivation can be characterized by behavioral changes such as drinking duration, reaching a plateau at 24 h. Complementary physiological data are warranted to fully assess the impact of water deprivation on hen welfare.
免于口渴是最不可否认的福利需求之一。然而,由于特定情况(如运输)或非自愿结果(如生病、受伤或处于从属地位的动物)导致的缺水对福利的影响仍不明确。本实验通过使用基于穿过狭窄垂直间隙获取水的动机测试,研究了不同时长缺水后蛋鸡的行为变化。20只蛋鸡被剥夺不同时长的水(0、12、18、24或32小时),并通过改变垂直间隙的宽度(150、135、120或100毫米)来改变获取水的成本,以进入测试笼的水侧。采用不完全随机区组设计,每只母鸡每周进行两次测试,共进行5周。测试装置与它们的家笼相同,但有两个笼子通过一个可调节的垂直间隙相连,另一侧有一个饮水器。与120毫米相比,母鸡在100毫米时在对照侧花费的时间比在水侧更多(P = 0.03)。母鸡为获取水而穿过狭窄垂直间隙的意愿并不因缺水时长而有所不同。尽管如此,缺水时长对母鸡的位置和行为有显著影响。与0和12小时相比,母鸡在18、24和32小时时在饮水器附近花费的时间更多(P < 0.05)。母鸡在24小时和32小时时饮水时间更长,其次是18、12小时,最后是0小时(P < 0.05)。与0小时对照相比,所有缺水时长的饮水潜伏期和频率都更高(P < 0.05)。缺水可通过诸如饮水时长等行为变化来表征,在24小时时达到平稳状态。需要补充生理数据以全面评估缺水对母鸡福利的影响。