Narayanan Sumana, Arumugam Dena, Mennona Steven, Wang Marlene, Davidov Tomer, Trooskin Stanley Z
Department of Surgery, Rutgers Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, New Brunswick, NJ, USA.
Rutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey, New Brunswick, NJ, USA.
Ann Surg Oncol. 2016 May;23(5):1440-5. doi: 10.1245/s10434-015-5004-3. Epub 2015 Dec 1.
Concern for postoperative complications causing airway compromise has limited widespread acceptance of ambulatory thyroid surgery. We evaluated differences in outcomes and hospital costs in those monitored for a short stay of 6 h (SS), inpatient observation of 6-23 h (IO), or inpatient admission of >23 h (IA).
We retrospectively reviewed all patients undergoing thyroidectomy from 2006 to 2012. The incidence of postoperative hemorrhage, nerve dysfunction, and hypocalcemia were evaluated, as well as cost data comparing the SS and IO groups.
Of 1447 thyroidectomies, 880 (60.8 %) were performed as SS, 401 (27.7 %) as IO, and 166 (11.5 %) as IA. Fewer patients in the SS group (59 %) underwent total thyroidectomy than IO (73 %) and IA (71 %; p < 0.01), and SS patients had smaller thyroid weights (27.9 g) compared with IO and IA (47.2 and 98.9 g, respectively; p < 0.01). Ten (0.69 %) patients developed hematomas requiring reoperation, five of the ten patients received antiplatelet or anticoagulant therapy perioperatively. Only one patient in the IA group bled within the 6- to 23-h period, and no patients with bleeding who were discharged at 6 h would have benefitted from 23-h observation. Twenty-four (1.66 %) recurrent laryngeal nerve injuries were identified, 16 with temporary neuropraxias. In addition, 24 (1.66 %) patients had symptomatic hypocalcemia, which was transient in 17 individuals. Financial data showed higher payments and lower costs associated with SS compared with IO.
Selective SS thyroidectomy can be safe and cost effective, with few overall complications in patients undergoing more complex operations involving larger thyroids who were admitted to hospital.
对术后并发症导致气道受压的担忧限制了门诊甲状腺手术的广泛接受度。我们评估了短期监测6小时(SS)、住院观察6 - 23小时(IO)或住院超过23小时(IA)的患者在结局和医院费用方面的差异。
我们回顾性分析了2006年至2012年期间所有接受甲状腺切除术的患者。评估术后出血、神经功能障碍和低钙血症的发生率,以及比较SS组和IO组的费用数据。
在1447例甲状腺切除术中,880例(60.8%)为SS手术,401例(27.7%)为IO手术,166例(11.5%)为IA手术。SS组接受全甲状腺切除术的患者(59%)少于IO组(73%)和IA组(71%;p < 0.01),且SS组患者的甲状腺重量(27.9克)低于IO组和IA组(分别为47.2克和98.9克;p < 0.01)。10例(0.69%)患者发生血肿需要再次手术,其中10例患者中有5例在围手术期接受了抗血小板或抗凝治疗。IA组只有1例患者在6至23小时内出血,且没有在6小时出院的出血患者会从23小时的观察中获益。共发现24例(1.66%)喉返神经损伤,其中16例为暂时性神经失用。此外,24例(1.66%)患者出现症状性低钙血症,其中17例为暂时性。财务数据显示,与IO组相比,SS组的支付费用更高但成本更低。
对于住院接受更复杂手术、甲状腺较大的患者,选择性SS甲状腺切除术可以安全且具有成本效益,总体并发症较少。