Grzelewski Tomasz, Stelmach Włodzimierz, Stelmach Rafał, Janas Anna, Grzelewska Aleksandra, Witkowski Konrad, Makandjou-Ola Eusebio, Majak Paweł, Stelmach Iwona
Departments of Pediatrics and Allergy, N. Copernicus Hospital, Medical University of Lodz, Lodz, Poland. Atlantic Clinic LTD, Southampton, Hampshire, United Kingdom.
Department of Social and Preventive Medicine, Medical University of Lodz, Lodz, Poland.
Respir Care. 2016 Feb;61(2):162-72. doi: 10.4187/respcare.04092. Epub 2015 Dec 1.
Recently, it has been proved that fractional exhaled nitric oxide (FENO) results are in disagreement with other measurements of asthma control. The objective of this work is to present and validate new lung function/lung inflammation ratios.
This is a retrospective, cross-sectional study in which we evaluated data from medical documentation of 1,529 pediatric and adolescent subjects and a small number (2% of the studied population) of young adults, who presented symptoms suggestive of asthma (age range 4-24 y). We are the first to analyze results obtained in this manner (before the introduction of controlled medication): FENO, spirometry, specific resistance of the airways, diagnosis of allergic diseases, and allergen sensitization (specific immunoglobulin E results).
Cut-off points for the new indicators allowed us to diagnose asthma in the study participants: for FVC/FENO ratio, 0.17 L/ppb; for FEV1/FENO ratio, 0.15 L/ppb; for forced expiratory flow during the middle half of the FVC maneuver (FEF25-75%)/FENO ratio, 0.16 L/s/ppb; for FENO/FVC ratio, 11.00 ppb/L; for FENO/FEV1 ratio, 12.53 ppb/L; and for FENO/FEF25-75% ratio, 11.81 ppb/L/s. Only the ratios described above were closely correlated with the diagnosis of asthma and with one another. They significantly differed between subjects with asthma and healthy subjects as well as between females and males. Only FEF25-75%/FENO and FENO/FEF25-75% values were significant predictors of any sensitization in the studied subjects. We found higher sensitivity than specificity and higher positive predictive value than negative predictive value for FVC/FENO, FEV1/FENO, and FEF25-75%/FENO and found a mirror image for reverse parameters. However, the positive predictive values and negative predictive values were not clearly convincing with respect to diagnostic accuracy in the case of the new parameters proposed.
We propose new lung function/lung inflammation ratios by which it may become possible to diagnose asthma in children and adolescents on the basis of a subject's spirometry and FENO measurements. We believe that our ratios are only supportive of the universally used parameters in the process of diagnosing asthma. (ClinicalTrials.gov registration NCT01805635.).
最近,已证实呼出一氧化氮分数(FENO)结果与哮喘控制的其他测量结果不一致。本研究的目的是提出并验证新的肺功能/肺炎症比值。
这是一项回顾性横断面研究,我们评估了1529名儿童和青少年以及少数(占研究人群的2%)年轻人的医疗记录数据,这些人表现出哮喘相关症状(年龄范围4 - 24岁)。我们是首个分析以这种方式(在引入控制性药物之前)获得的结果的研究:FENO、肺量计、气道比气道阻力、过敏性疾病诊断以及过敏原致敏情况(特异性免疫球蛋白E结果)。
新指标的截断点使我们能够在研究参与者中诊断哮喘:FVC/FENO比值为0.17 L/ppb;FEV1/FENO比值为0.15 L/ppb;用力肺活量(FVC)动作中半程的用力呼气流量(FEF25 - 75%)/FENO比值为0.16 L/s/ppb;FENO/FVC比值为11.00 ppb/L;FENO/FEV1比值为12.53 ppb/L;FENO/FEF25 - 75%比值为11.81 ppb/L/s。只有上述比值与哮喘诊断密切相关且相互之间密切相关。它们在哮喘患者与健康受试者之间以及女性与男性之间存在显著差异。在研究对象中,只有FEF25 - 75%/FENO和FENO/FEF25 - 75%值是任何致敏情况的显著预测指标。我们发现FVC/FENO、FEV1/FENO和FEF25 - 75%/FENO的敏感性高于特异性,阳性预测值高于阴性预测值,而反向参数则呈现相反情况。然而,就所提出的新参数而言,其阳性预测值和阴性预测值在诊断准确性方面并不具有明显说服力。
我们提出了新的肺功能/肺炎症比值,据此有可能根据受试者的肺量计和FENO测量结果诊断儿童和青少年哮喘。我们认为我们的比值仅在哮喘诊断过程中辅助普遍使用的参数。(ClinicalTrials.gov注册号NCT01805635.)