Mingueneau M, Chaix A, Scotti N, Chaix J, Reynders A, Hammond C, Thimonier J
Centre d'Immunologie de Marseille Luminy, Aix-Marseille Université-Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale (INSERM)-Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, Parc Scientifique en Technologique de Luminy, Marseille, France;
INSERM U891, Centre de Recherche en Cancérologie de Marseille, Université de la Méditerranée, Marseille, France;
Adv Physiol Educ. 2015 Dec;39(4):383-91. doi: 10.1152/advan.00045.2015.
In the present article, we describe a 3-day experimental workshop on type I diabetes aimed at helping high school students to understand how fundamental research on glycemia regulation contributes to the development of scientific knowledge and therapeutic strategies. The workshop engaged students in open-ended investigations and guided experiments. Each class was divided into three or four groups, with each group working with a trained doctoral student or postdoctoral fellow. During an initial questioning phase, students observed slides depicting the glycemia of individuals in various situations. Students identified hyperglycemic individuals relative to the average glycemia of the displayed population. Students were asked to devise a treatment for these diabetics. They quickly realized that they couldn't experiment on patients and understood the need for laboratory models. Each group gave ideas of experiments to perform. We then explained, taking into account their propositions, the protocols students could execute to address one of the following questions: Which criteria must an animal model of diabetes fulfill? How do pancreatic cells maintain glycemia? Is there a way to produce an insulin protein similar to the one released by human pancreatic cells? We used two different evaluation metrics of the workshop: a questionnaire filled out by the students before and after the workshop and a poster produced by students at the end of the workshop. We found that this educational approach successfully improved student awareness and understanding of the scientific reasoning and research process.
在本文中,我们描述了一个为期三天的关于1型糖尿病的实验性工作坊,旨在帮助高中生理解血糖调节的基础研究如何促进科学知识的发展和治疗策略的制定。该工作坊让学生参与开放式调查和指导性实验。每个班级被分成三到四个小组,每个小组与一名经过培训的博士生或博士后合作。在初始提问阶段,学生们观察描绘不同情况下个体血糖水平的幻灯片。学生们相对于所展示人群的平均血糖水平识别出血糖过高的个体。学生们被要求为这些糖尿病患者设计一种治疗方法。他们很快意识到不能在患者身上进行实验,并理解了实验室模型的必要性。每个小组都提出了要进行的实验想法。然后,我们根据他们的提议,解释了学生们可以执行的方案,以解决以下问题之一:糖尿病动物模型必须满足哪些标准?胰腺细胞如何维持血糖水平?是否有办法生产出与人类胰腺细胞释放的胰岛素蛋白相似的胰岛素蛋白?我们使用了该工作坊的两种不同评估指标:学生在工作坊前后填写的问卷,以及学生在工作坊结束时制作的海报。我们发现这种教育方法成功提高了学生对科学推理和研究过程的认识与理解。