Bayer A J, Pathy M S, Cameron A, Venkateswalu T, Ather S A, Mankikar G D, Ghosh A K
University Department of Geriatric Medicine, Cardiff Royal Infirmary, England.
Clin Neuropharmacol. 1989;12 Suppl 1:S50-5; Discussion S56-7. doi: 10.1097/00002826-198901001-00009.
One hundred sixty-six elderly depressed patients were recruited from six hospital centers and entered in a double-blind, randomized, parallel group comparative study of conventional and controlled-release formulations of trazodone. Patients received a single nighttime dose of 100 mg for 1 week, followed by 3 weeks of 200 mg or less, depending upon tolerance. Efficacy was measured using the modified Hamilton depression rating scale and global assessments of the severity of depression and improvement relative to baseline. Both treatments were equally effective with 39 (68%) patients completing 4 weeks of treatment with the conventional formulation and 41 (77%) patients completing 4 weeks treatment with the controlled-release formulation rated as very much improved. Sleep improved shortly after initiation of treatment in most patients and there were no significant differences between groups. There was a tendency for fewer side effects to be recorded during the first week of treatment in patients receiving the controlled-release formulation but no difference reached statistical significance.
166名老年抑郁症患者从六个医院中心招募而来,参与了一项关于曲唑酮常规制剂和控释制剂的双盲、随机、平行组对照研究。患者每晚单次服用100毫克,持续1周,随后根据耐受性服用3周200毫克或更低剂量。使用改良的汉密尔顿抑郁评定量表以及相对于基线的抑郁严重程度和改善情况的整体评估来衡量疗效。两种治疗方法同样有效,39名(68%)患者完成了4周的常规制剂治疗,41名(77%)患者完成了4周的控释制剂治疗,评定为显著改善。大多数患者在开始治疗后不久睡眠就有所改善,两组之间没有显著差异。接受控释制剂治疗的患者在治疗第一周记录到的副作用有减少的趋势,但差异未达到统计学显著性。