• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

头孢克肟与阿莫西林/克拉维酸治疗下呼吸道感染的对比

Cefixime versus amoxicillin/clavulanic acid in lower respiratory tract infections.

作者信息

Beumer H M

机构信息

Military Hospital, Dr. A. Mathijsen, Utrecht, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Int J Clin Pharmacol Ther Toxicol. 1989 Jan;27(1):30-3.

PMID:2663735
Abstract

Sixty patients with lower respiratory tract infections, mainly acute bronchitis were treated for 14 days with either cefixime 200 mg twice daily (plus placebo once daily) or amoxicillin/clavulanic acid 500 mg/125 mg thrice daily in a double-blind manner. The sputum cultures indicated that all isolated pathogens (notably Hemophilus species, S. pneumoniae and B. catarrhalis, including the beta-lactamase producing species) were sensitive to cefixime, with the exception of Pseudomonas species. The bacteriological eradication rates were 54% and 52% for cefixime and amoxicillin/clavulanic acid, respectively. The positive clinical response (cured or improved) was 71% for the cefixime treated group and 74% in the amoxicillin/clavulanic acid group. There were no side effects and no significant adverse laboratory changes in both groups. The results indicate that cefixime twice daily is comparable in safety and efficacy with amoxicillin/clavulanic acid, thrice daily in acute bronchitis.

摘要

60例主要患有急性支气管炎的下呼吸道感染患者,以双盲方式接受为期14天的治疗,其中一组每日两次服用200毫克头孢克肟(加每日一次服用安慰剂),另一组每日三次服用500毫克/125毫克阿莫西林/克拉维酸。痰培养表明,所有分离出的病原体(尤其是嗜血杆菌属、肺炎链球菌和卡他莫拉菌,包括产β-内酰胺酶的菌种)对头孢克肟敏感,但铜绿假单胞菌属除外。头孢克肟和阿莫西林/克拉维酸的细菌学根除率分别为54%和52%。头孢克肟治疗组的临床阳性反应(治愈或改善)为71%,阿莫西林/克拉维酸组为74%。两组均无副作用,实验室检查也无显著不良变化。结果表明,在急性支气管炎治疗中,每日两次服用头孢克肟在安全性和疗效方面与每日三次服用阿莫西林/克拉维酸相当。

相似文献

1
Cefixime versus amoxicillin/clavulanic acid in lower respiratory tract infections.头孢克肟与阿莫西林/克拉维酸治疗下呼吸道感染的对比
Int J Clin Pharmacol Ther Toxicol. 1989 Jan;27(1):30-3.
2
Once-a-day therapy for sinusitis: a comparison study of cefixime and amoxicillin.鼻窦炎的每日一次治疗:头孢克肟与阿莫西林的比较研究
Laryngoscope. 1993 Jan;103(1 Pt 1):33-41. doi: 10.1288/00005537-199301000-00008.
3
[Clinical evaluation of an amoxicillin-clavulanic acid combination in respiratory tract infections].阿莫西林-克拉维酸组合用于呼吸道感染的临床评估
Clin Ter. 1987 Feb 15;120(3):211-8.
4
Comparative in vitro activity of a pharmacokinetically enhanced oral formulation of amoxicillin/clavulanic acid (2000/125 mg twice daily) against 9172 respiratory isolates collected worldwide in 2000.阿莫西林/克拉维酸药代动力学增强型口服制剂(2000/125毫克,每日两次)对2000年全球收集的9172株呼吸道分离菌的体外活性比较
Int J Infect Dis. 2004 Nov;8(6):362-73. doi: 10.1016/j.ijid.2004.02.005.
5
Comparison of oral erythromycin ethylsuccinate and clavulanate-potentiated amoxicillin in the treatment of acute respiratory tract infections.口服琥乙红霉素与克拉维酸增强型阿莫西林治疗急性呼吸道感染的比较。
Clin Ther. 1989 Nov-Dec;11(6):812-9.
6
[Amoxicillin and clavulanic acid versus amoxicillin plus gentamicin in the empirical initial treatment of urinary tract infections in hospitalized patients].
Schweiz Med Wochenschr. 1995 Aug 19;125(33):1533-9.
7
Treatment of respiratory tract infections with a combination of amoxycillin and clavulanic acid.阿莫西林与克拉维酸联合治疗呼吸道感染
Int J Clin Pharmacol Ther Toxicol. 1985 Dec;23(12):647-9.
8
Ofloxacin in the treatment of lower respiratory tract infections: report of a prospective, comparative trial.
Clin Ther. 1991 Jul-Aug;13(4):460-6.
9
Once-a-day cefixime versus co-amoxiclav three times daily in the treatment of lower respiratory infections.
J Antimicrob Chemother. 1995 Feb;35(2):354-7. doi: 10.1093/jac/35.2.354.
10
[Controlled multicentric study comparing cefixime and amoxicillin in the treatment of lower respiratory tract infections in adults].[比较头孢克肟和阿莫西林治疗成人下呼吸道感染的对照多中心研究]
Presse Med. 1989 Oct 11;18(32):1600-4.

引用本文的文献

1
Cefixime. A review of its therapeutic efficacy in lower respiratory tract infections.头孢克肟。其在下呼吸道感染中治疗效果的综述。
Drugs. 1995 Jun;49(6):1007-22. doi: 10.2165/00003495-199549060-00010.
2
Cefixime. A review of its antibacterial activity. Pharmacokinetic properties and therapeutic potential.头孢克肟。其抗菌活性、药代动力学特性及治疗潜力综述。
Drugs. 1989 Oct;38(4):524-50. doi: 10.2165/00003495-198938040-00004.
3
Amoxicillin/clavulanic acid. An update of its antibacterial activity, pharmacokinetic properties and therapeutic use.
阿莫西林/克拉维酸:抗菌活性、药代动力学特性及治疗用途的最新进展
Drugs. 1990 Feb;39(2):264-307. doi: 10.2165/00003495-199039020-00008.
4
[Clinical experiences with cefixime in the treatment of bacterial infections of the lower respiratory tract].
Infection. 1990;18 Suppl 3:S119-21. doi: 10.1007/BF01644628.
5
[Treatment results using cefixime for bacterial respiratory tract infections].
Infection. 1990;18 Suppl 3:S115-8. doi: 10.1007/BF01644627.
6
Comparative efficacies of ciprofloxacin, amoxicillin, amoxicillin-clavulanic acid, and cefaclor against experimental Streptococcus pneumoniae respiratory infections in mice.环丙沙星、阿莫西林、阿莫西林-克拉维酸和头孢克洛对小鼠实验性肺炎链球菌呼吸道感染的比较疗效。
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1991 May;35(5):831-6. doi: 10.1128/AAC.35.5.831.