Brewster Amanda L, Curry Leslie A, Cherlin Emily J, Talbert-Slagle Kristina, Horwitz Leora I, Bradley Elizabeth H
Department of Health Policy and Management, Yale School of Public Health, New Haven, CT, USA.
Division of Healthcare Delivery Science, Department of Population Health, New York University School of Medicine, New York, NY, USA.
Implement Sci. 2015 Dec 5;10:168. doi: 10.1186/s13012-015-0357-3.
Hospital quality improvement efforts absorb substantial time and resources, but many innovations fail to integrate into organizational routines, undermining the potential to sustain the new practices. Despite a well-developed literature on the initial implementation of new practices, we have limited knowledge about the mechanisms by which integration occurs.
We conducted a qualitative study using a purposive sample of hospitals that participated in the State Action on Avoidable Rehospitalizations (STAAR) initiative, a collaborative to reduce hospital readmissions that encouraged members to adopt new practices. We selected hospitals where risk-standardized readmission rates (RSRR) had improved (n = 7) or deteriorated (n = 3) over the course of the first 2 years of the STAAR initiative (2010-2011 to 2011-2012) and interviewed a range of staff at each site (90 total). We recruited hospitals until reaching theoretical saturation. The constant comparative method was used to conduct coding and identification of key themes.
When innovations were successfully integrated, participants consistently reported that a small number of key staff held the innovation in place for as long as a year while more permanent integrating mechanisms began to work. Depending on characteristics of the innovation, one of three categories of integrating mechanisms eventually took over the role of holding new practices in place. Innovations that proved intrinsically rewarding to the staff, by making their jobs easier or more gratifying, became integrated through shifts in attitudes and norms over time. Innovations for which the staff did not perceive benefits to themselves were integrated through revised performance standards if the innovation involved complex tasks and through automation if the innovation involved simple tasks.
Hospitals have an opportunity to promote the integration of new practices by planning for the extended effort required to hold a new practice in place while integration mechanisms take hold. By understanding how integrating mechanisms correspond to innovation characteristics, hospitals may be able to foster integrating mechanisms most likely to work for particular innovations.
医院质量改进工作耗费大量时间和资源,但许多创新未能融入组织日常工作,削弱了维持新实践的潜力。尽管关于新实践初始实施的文献丰富,但我们对整合发生的机制了解有限。
我们进行了一项定性研究,采用目的抽样法选取参与“避免可避免再入院国家行动”(STAAR)倡议的医院,该倡议是一项旨在降低医院再入院率的合作项目,鼓励成员采用新实践。我们选择了在STAAR倡议的前两年(2010 - 2011年至2011 - 2012年)风险标准化再入院率(RSRR)有所改善(n = 7)或恶化(n = 3)的医院,并对每个医院的一系列工作人员进行了访谈(共90人)。我们持续招募医院直至达到理论饱和。采用持续比较法进行编码和关键主题识别。
当创新成功整合时,参与者一致报告称,少数关键工作人员会将创新维持长达一年,同时更具永久性的整合机制开始发挥作用。根据创新的特点,三类整合机制中的一类最终会接管维持新实践的角色。那些通过使工作更轻松或更令人满意而被证明对工作人员具有内在奖励性的创新,会随着时间推移通过态度和规范的转变而得以整合。如果创新涉及复杂任务,工作人员未察觉到自身益处的创新会通过修订绩效标准来整合;如果创新涉及简单任务,则通过自动化来整合。
医院有机会通过规划在整合机制发挥作用期间维持新实践所需的长期努力,来促进新实践的整合。通过了解整合机制与创新特点的对应关系,医院或许能够培育出最有可能适用于特定创新的整合机制。