Department of Hepatology & Gastroenterology, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark.
Department of Clinical Biochemistry, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark.
J Hepatol. 2016 Apr;64(4):813-22. doi: 10.1016/j.jhep.2015.11.021. Epub 2015 Nov 27.
BACKGROUND & AIMS: Activation of liver macrophages plays a key role in liver and systemic inflammation and may be involved in development and prognosis of acute-on-chronic liver failure (ACLF). We therefore measured the circulating macrophage activation markers soluble sCD163 and mannose receptor (sMR) and related them to the short-(1-3 months) and long-term (6 months) mortality in the cirrhosis patients of the CANONIC study.
Eighty-six cirrhosis patients had no ascites and no ACLF, 580 had ascites but no ACLF; 100, 66, and 19 had ACLF-grade-I (ACLF-I), ACLF-II, and ACLF-III, respectively. The patients' clinical course was registered and their MELD, CLIF-C Acute Decompensation (AD), and CLIF-C ACLF-scores computed at inclusion.
We found a stepwise increase (p<0.001) in median sCD163 (5.68 (IQR: 3.86-9.60); 8.26 (5.02-12.34); 9.50 (5.37-17.91); 15.68 (10.12-19.42); 20.18 (15.26-32.20) mg/L) and sMR (0.60 (0.40-0.84); 0.81 (0.57-1.12); 0.81 (0.61-1.26); 1.17 (0.89-1.62); 1.41 (1.14-1.79)mg/L) with increasing grades of ACLF. Both sCD163 and sMR were independently associated with short and long-term mortality and showed equal or higher predictive accuracy than MELD, CLIF-C ACLF and CLIF-C AD scores. Addition of the macrophage markers to the clinical scores improved the prognostic efficacy: In ACLF patients sCD163 improved prediction of short-term mortality (C-index: 0.74 (0.67-0.80)) and in patients without ACLF sMR improved prediction of long-term mortality (C-index: 0.80 (0.76-0.85)).
The severity related increase in sCD163 and sMR and close association with mortality suggest a primary importance of inflammatory activation of liver macrophages in the emergence and course of ACLF. Accordingly, supplementation of the macrophage biomarkers to the platform of the clinical scores improved the prognostic performance beyond that of the original scores.
肝巨噬细胞的激活在肝脏和全身炎症中起着关键作用,可能与急性肝衰竭(ACLF)的发展和预后有关。因此,我们测量了循环巨噬细胞激活标志物可溶性 sCD163 和甘露糖受体(sMR),并将其与 CANONIC 研究中肝硬化患者的短期(1-3 个月)和长期(6 个月)死亡率相关联。
86 例肝硬化患者无腹水且无 ACLF,580 例有腹水但无 ACLF;100 例、66 例和 19 例分别患有 ACLF 级-I(ACLF-I)、ACLF-II 和 ACLF-III。记录患者的临床病程,并在纳入时计算其 MELD、CLIF-C 急性失代偿(AD)和 CLIF-C ACLF 评分。
我们发现 sCD163(中位数(IQR):5.68(3.86-9.60);8.26(5.02-12.34);9.50(5.37-17.91);15.68(10.12-19.42);20.18(15.26-32.20)mg/L)和 sMR(中位数(IQR):0.60(0.40-0.84);0.81(0.57-1.12);0.81(0.61-1.26);1.17(0.89-1.62);1.41(1.14-1.79)mg/L)随着 ACLF 严重程度的增加呈递增趋势(p<0.001)。sCD163 和 sMR 均与短期和长期死亡率独立相关,其预测准确性与 MELD、CLIF-C ACLF 和 CLIF-C AD 评分相当或更高。将巨噬细胞标志物添加到临床评分中可提高预测效果:在 ACLF 患者中,sCD163 可改善短期死亡率的预测(C 指数:0.74(0.67-0.80)),而在无 ACLF 的患者中,sMR 可改善长期死亡率的预测(C 指数:0.80(0.76-0.85))。
sCD163 和 sMR 与严重程度相关的增加以及与死亡率的密切关联表明,肝巨噬细胞的炎症激活在 ACLF 的发生和病程中起着主要作用。因此,将巨噬细胞生物标志物补充到临床评分平台中,可以提高预测性能,超过原始评分。