Ernst T J, Griffin J D
Division of Tumor Immunology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Mass.
Immunol Res. 1989;8(3):202-14. doi: 10.1007/BF02918145.
Considerable progress has been made over the last 5 years in defining the exact factors which make up 'colony-stimulating activity', the cells that produce individual CSFs, and determining some of the stimuli that lead to secretion of specific CSFs. There is much to learn however about the mechanisms of CSF action, and also much to learn about the role these factors play in hematopoietic regulation in vivo. The role, if any, of marrow stromal cells in the production of CSFs is particularly important and needs much clearer definition. Much of our understanding of CSF activity has been previously dependent on in vitro bioassays which were sensitive but frequently imprecise. The availability of purified recombinant protein has alleviated the reliance on conditioned media. Previously used conditioned media frequently contained multiple growth factors and inhibitory factors. The cloning of the CSFs has revealed both structural homology and diversity. The conserved genomic structural schema between the majority of the CSFs suggest a common ancestral gene. However, M-CSF diverges from this schema. Conserved also is the 3' untranslated motif of AUUUA in the majority of CSFs. M-CSF is again divergent in this respect. However, where regulation of the mRNA transcript level has been characterized carefully, normal cells appear to regulate CSF mRNAs primarily in a post transcriptional manner. The regulation of CSF transcription in leukemia is complex. In retrovirally mediated leukemia, CSF production is due to increased transcription mediated by the retrovirus. In the few cases of human leukemias making CSFs which have been studied, evidence for both post-transcriptional regulation and structural rearrangements in the CSF genes has been presented. Due to the extreme rarity of normal hematopoietic progenitor cells that correspond to the same state of differentiation as that of the leukemic blast forms, several questions remain. Do normal progenitor cells also make CSFs at some stages of differentiation? What role, if any, do CSFs play in leukemogenesis? The rapid development of our understanding of CSFs over the past several years has led to a much better understanding of hematopoiesis. As we understand more of normal hematopoiesis we also begin to understand the complexities involved in the abnormal regulation as in myelogenous leukemias. With the powerful tools currently available we can be much more precise in our understanding of the intricacies involved.
在过去5年里,在确定构成“集落刺激活性”的确切因素、产生单个集落刺激因子(CSF)的细胞以及确定导致特定CSF分泌的一些刺激因素方面已经取得了相当大的进展。然而,关于CSF作用的机制还有很多需要了解的,而且关于这些因子在体内造血调节中所起的作用也有很多需要了解的。骨髓基质细胞在CSF产生中的作用(如果有的话)尤为重要,需要更明确的定义。我们以前对CSF活性的许多理解依赖于体外生物测定法,这些方法很灵敏但常常不准确。纯化重组蛋白的可得性减轻了对条件培养基的依赖。以前使用的条件培养基常常含有多种生长因子和抑制因子。CSF的克隆揭示了结构上的同源性和多样性。大多数CSF之间保守的基因组结构模式表明有一个共同的祖先基因。然而,巨噬细胞集落刺激因子(M-CSF)与这种模式不同。大多数CSF中3'非翻译基序AUUUA也是保守的。M-CSF在这方面再次不同。然而,在仔细研究了mRNA转录水平的调节的情况下,正常细胞似乎主要以转录后方式调节CSF mRNA。白血病中CSF转录的调节很复杂。在逆转录病毒介导的白血病中,CSF的产生是由于逆转录病毒介导的转录增加。在已研究的少数产生CSF的人类白血病病例中,已经提出了CSF基因转录后调节和结构重排的证据。由于与白血病原始细胞处于相同分化状态的正常造血祖细胞极其罕见,几个问题仍然存在。正常祖细胞在分化的某些阶段也产生CSF吗?CSF在白血病发生中起什么作用(如果有的话)?在过去几年里,我们对CSF的理解迅速发展,这使我们对造血有了更好的理解。随着我们对正常造血了解得更多,我们也开始理解髓性白血病等异常调节中涉及的复杂性。有了目前可用的强大工具,我们对所涉及的错综复杂之处的理解可以更加精确。