Suppr超能文献

经颅直流电刺激对构成对比敏感度函数的空间频率和方向的影响。

The Effects of tDCS Across the Spatial Frequencies and Orientations that Comprise the Contrast Sensitivity Function.

作者信息

Richard Bruno, Johnson Aaron P, Thompson Benjamin, Hansen Bruce C

机构信息

Department of Psychology, Concordia University, Montreal QC, Canada ; Department of Psychology, University of York York, UK.

Department of Psychology, Concordia University, Montreal QC, Canada.

出版信息

Front Psychol. 2015 Nov 27;6:1784. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01784. eCollection 2015.

Abstract

Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (tDCS) has recently been employed in traditional psychophysical paradigms in an effort to measure direct manipulations on spatial frequency channel operations in the early visual system. However, the effects of tDCS on contrast sensitivity have only been measured at a single spatial frequency and orientation. Since contrast sensitivity is known to depend on spatial frequency and orientation, we ask how the effects of anodal and cathodal tDCS may vary according to these dimensions. We measured contrast sensitivity with sinusoidal gratings at four different spatial frequencies (0.5, 4, 8, and 12 cycles/°), two orientations (45° Oblique and Horizontal), and for two stimulus size conditions [fixed size (3°) and fixed period (1.5 cycles)]. Only contrast sensitivity measured with a 45° oblique grating with a spatial frequency of 8 cycles/° (period = 1.5 cycles) demonstrated clear polarity specific effects of tDCS, whereby cathodal tDCS increased and anodal tDCS decreased contrast sensitivity. Overall, effects of tDCS were largest for oblique stimuli presented at high spatial frequencies (i.e., 8 and 12 cycles/°), and were small or absent at lower spatial frequencies, other orientations and stimulus size. Thus, the impact of tDCS on contrast sensitivity, and therefore on spatial frequency channel operations, is opposite in direction to other behavioral effects of tDCS, and only measurable in stimuli that generally elicit lower contrast sensitivity (e.g., oblique gratings with period of 1.5 cycles at spatial frequencies above the peak of the contrast sensitivity function).

摘要

经颅直流电刺激(tDCS)最近已被应用于传统心理物理学范式中,旨在测量对早期视觉系统中空间频率通道操作的直接影响。然而,tDCS对对比度敏感度的影响仅在单一空间频率和方向上进行了测量。由于已知对比度敏感度取决于空间频率和方向,我们探讨阳极和阴极tDCS的影响如何根据这些维度而变化。我们使用正弦光栅在四个不同空间频率(0.5、4、8和12周/度)、两个方向(45°倾斜和水平)以及两种刺激大小条件[固定大小(3°)和固定周期(1.5个周期)]下测量了对比度敏感度。只有在空间频率为8周/度(周期 = 1.5个周期)的45°倾斜光栅下测量的对比度敏感度显示出tDCS明显的极性特异性效应,即阴极tDCS提高了对比度敏感度,而阳极tDCS降低了对比度敏感度。总体而言,tDCS对以高空间频率(即8和12周/度)呈现的倾斜刺激的影响最大,而在较低空间频率、其他方向和刺激大小下影响较小或不存在。因此,tDCS对对比度敏感度以及空间频率通道操作的影响方向与tDCS的其他行为效应相反,并且仅在通常引发较低对比度敏感度的刺激中可测量(例如,在对比度敏感度函数峰值以上空间频率处周期为1.5个周期的倾斜光栅)。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6e75/4661264/f51e307b44e5/fpsyg-06-01784-g001.jpg

相似文献

6
An oblique effect of spatial summation.空间总和的倾斜效应。
Vision Res. 1983;23(6):655-8. doi: 10.1016/0042-6989(83)90072-x.

引用本文的文献

本文引用的文献

3
Rethinking the role of sham TMS.重新思考假经颅磁刺激的作用。
Front Psychol. 2015 Feb 26;6:210. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00210. eCollection 2015.
9
Modelling non-invasive brain stimulation in cognitive neuroscience.认知神经科学中的非侵入性脑刺激建模。
Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2013 Sep;37(8):1702-12. doi: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2013.06.014. Epub 2013 Jul 1.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验