• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

最佳选择以及决策不一致属性对基于记忆的决策中决策信心和选择的影响。

Take-the-best and the influence of decision-inconsistent attributes on decision confidence and choices in memory-based decisions.

作者信息

Dummel Sebastian, Rummel Jan

机构信息

a Department of Psychology , Heidelberg University , Heidelberg , Germany.

出版信息

Memory. 2016 Nov;24(10):1435-43. doi: 10.1080/09658211.2015.1117642. Epub 2015 Dec 7.

DOI:10.1080/09658211.2015.1117642
PMID:26642913
Abstract

Take-the-best (TTB) is a decision strategy according to which attributes about choice options are sequentially processed in descending order of validity, and attribute processing is stopped once an attribute discriminates between options. Consequently, TTB-decisions rely on only one, the best discriminating, attribute, and lower-valid attributes need not be processed because they are TTB-irrelevant. Recent research suggests, however, that when attribute information is visually present during decision-making, TTB-irrelevant attributes are processed and integrated into decisions nonetheless. To examine whether TTB-irrelevant attributes are retrieved and integrated when decisions are made memory-based, we tested whether the consistency of a TTB-irrelevant attribute affects TTB-users' decision behaviour in a memory-based decision task. Participants first learned attribute configurations of several options. Afterwards, they made several decisions between two of the options, and we manipulated conflict between the second-best attribute and the TTB-decision. We assessed participants' decision confidence and the proportion of TTB-inconsistent choices. According to TTB, TTB-irrelevant attributes should not affect confidence and choices, because these attributes should not be retrieved. Results showed, however, that TTB-users were less confident and made more TTB-inconsistent choices when TTB-irrelevant information was in conflict with the TTB-decision than when it was not, suggesting that TTB-users retrieved and integrated TTB-irrelevant information.

摘要

取优启发式(TTB)是一种决策策略,根据该策略,关于选择选项的属性会按照有效性的降序依次进行处理,一旦某个属性能够区分选项,属性处理就会停止。因此,TTB决策仅依赖于一个最佳区分属性,较低有效性的属性无需处理,因为它们与TTB无关。然而,最近的研究表明,当属性信息在决策过程中以视觉形式呈现时,与TTB无关的属性仍然会被处理并整合到决策中。为了检验在基于记忆的决策中与TTB无关的属性是否会被检索并整合,我们在一项基于记忆的决策任务中测试了与TTB无关的属性的一致性是否会影响TTB使用者的决策行为。参与者首先学习了几个选项的属性配置。之后,他们在其中两个选项之间做出了几个决策,我们操纵了次优属性与TTB决策之间的冲突。我们评估了参与者的决策信心以及TTB不一致选择的比例。根据TTB,与TTB无关的属性不应影响信心和选择,因为这些属性不应被检索。然而,结果表明,当与TTB无关的信息与TTB决策冲突时,TTB使用者的信心较低,做出的TTB不一致选择也比不冲突时更多,这表明TTB使用者检索并整合了与TTB无关的信息。

相似文献

1
Take-the-best and the influence of decision-inconsistent attributes on decision confidence and choices in memory-based decisions.最佳选择以及决策不一致属性对基于记忆的决策中决策信心和选择的影响。
Memory. 2016 Nov;24(10):1435-43. doi: 10.1080/09658211.2015.1117642. Epub 2015 Dec 7.
2
Additional information is not ignored: New evidence for information integration and inhibition in take-the-best decisions.额外信息不会被忽视:关于在采用最佳策略决策中信息整合与抑制的新证据。
Acta Psychol (Amst). 2016 Jan;163:167-84. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2015.12.001. Epub 2015 Dec 11.
3
Automatic activation of attribute knowledge in heuristic inference from memory.启发式推理中基于记忆的属性知识的自动激活。
Psychon Bull Rev. 2013 Apr;20(2):372-7. doi: 10.3758/s13423-012-0334-7.
4
Single-process versus multiple-strategy models of decision making: evidence from an information intrusion paradigm.决策的单进程与多策略模型:来自信息侵入范式的证据
Acta Psychol (Amst). 2014 Feb;146:84-96. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2013.12.007. Epub 2014 Jan 16.
5
Parallel constraint satisfaction in memory-based decisions.基于记忆的决策中的并行约束满足
Exp Psychol. 2011;58(3):180-95. doi: 10.1027/1618-3169/a000084.
6
A response-time approach to comparing generalized rational and take-the-best models of decision making.一种用于比较广义理性决策模型和最佳选择决策模型的反应时间方法。
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2007 Jan;33(1):107-29. doi: 10.1037/0278-7393.33.1.107.
7
Neural Signatures of Rational and Heuristic Choice Strategies: A Single Trial ERP Analysis.理性与启发式选择策略的神经特征:单次试验ERP分析
Front Hum Neurosci. 2017 Aug 18;11:401. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2017.00401. eCollection 2017.
8
Memory-based decision-making with heuristics: evidence for a controlled activation of memory representations.基于记忆的启发式决策:记忆表征受控激活的证据。
J Cogn Neurosci. 2011 Nov;23(11):3540-54. doi: 10.1162/jocn_a_00059. Epub 2011 May 13.
9
Multiattribute Decision-making in Macaques Relies on Direct Attribute Comparisons.猕猴的多属性决策依赖于直接属性比较。
J Cogn Neurosci. 2024 Sep 1;36(9):1879-1897. doi: 10.1162/jocn_a_02208.
10
Multi-attribute decision-making in macaques relies on direct attribute comparisons.猕猴的多属性决策依赖于直接的属性比较。
bioRxiv. 2023 Nov 22:2023.10.22.563329. doi: 10.1101/2023.10.22.563329.

引用本文的文献

1
The effect of trial repetition and problem size on the consistency of decision making.试验重复和问题规模对决策一致性的影响。
PLoS One. 2019 May 6;14(5):e0216235. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0216235. eCollection 2019.