Suppr超能文献

与使用胎儿头皮电极相关的新生儿并发症:一项回顾性研究。

Neonatal complications associated with use of fetal scalp electrode: a retrospective study.

机构信息

Obstetrics and Gynecology, MedStar Washington Hospital Center, Washington, DC, USA.

Obstetrics and Gynecology, MedStar Georgetown University Hospital, Washington, DC, USA.

出版信息

BJOG. 2016 Oct;123(11):1797-803. doi: 10.1111/1471-0528.13817. Epub 2015 Dec 8.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To estimate the incidence and risk of complications associated with a fetal scalp electrode and to determine whether its application in the setting of operative vaginal delivery was associated with increased neonatal morbidity.

DESIGN

Retrospective cohort study.

SETTING

Twelve clinical centers with 19 hospitals across nine American Congress of Obstetricians and Gynecologists US districts.

POPULATION

Women in the USA.

METHODS

We evaluated 171 698 women with singleton deliveries ≥ 23 weeks of gestation in a secondary analysis of the Consortium on Safe Labor study between 2002 and 2008, after excluding conditions that precluded fetal scalp electrode application such as prelabour caesarean delivery. Secondary analysis limited to operative vaginal deliveries ≥ 34 weeks of gestation was also performed.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Incidences and adjusted odds ratios with 95% confidence intervals of neonatal complications were calculated, controlling for maternal characteristics, delivery mode and pregnancy complications.

RESULTS

Fetal scalp electrode was used in 37 492 (22%) of deliveries. In non-operative vaginal delivery, fetal scalp electrode was associated with increased risk of injury to scalp due to birth trauma (1.2% versus 0.9%; adjusted odds ratios 1.62; 95% confidence intervals 1.41-1.86) and cephalohaematoma (1.0% versus 0.9%; adjusted odds ratios 1.57; 95% confidence intervals 1.36-1.83). Neonatal complications were not significantly different comparing fetal scalp electrode with vacuum-assisted vaginal delivery and vacuum-assisted vaginal delivery alone or comparing fetal scalp electrode with forceps-assisted vaginal delivery and forceps-assisted vaginal delivery alone.

CONCLUSIONS

We found increased neonatal morbidity with fetal scalp electrode though the absolute risk was very low. It is possible that these findings reflect an underlying indication for its use. Our findings support the use of fetal scalp electrodes when clinically indicated.

TWEETABLE ABSTRACT

Neonatal risks associated with fetal scalp electrode use were low (injury to scalp 1.2% and cephalohaematoma 1.0%).

摘要

目的

评估胎儿头皮电极相关并发症的发生率和风险,并确定其在阴道分娩中的应用是否与新生儿发病率增加有关。

设计

回顾性队列研究。

地点

美国 9 个美国妇产科医师学会(ACOG)区域的 19 家医院的 12 个临床中心。

人群

美国妇女。

方法

我们在 2002 年至 2008 年期间对安全分娩联合会研究进行了二次分析,排除了前置剖宫产等妨碍胎儿头皮电极应用的情况后,评估了 171698 名胎龄≥23 周的单胎分娩妇女。还对胎龄≥34 周的阴道分娩进行了二次分析。

主要观察指标

计算新生儿并发症的发生率和调整后的比值比及其 95%置信区间,控制了产妇特征、分娩方式和妊娠并发症。

结果

胎儿头皮电极在 37492 例(22%)分娩中使用。在非阴道分娩中,胎儿头皮电极与因分娩创伤导致的头皮损伤风险增加有关(1.2%比 0.9%;调整后的比值比 1.62;95%置信区间 1.41-1.86)和头颅血肿(1.0%比 0.9%;调整后的比值比 1.57;95%置信区间 1.36-1.83)。与真空辅助阴道分娩和单纯真空辅助阴道分娩相比,与头皮电极相比,新生儿并发症无显著差异,与产钳辅助阴道分娩和单纯产钳辅助阴道分娩相比也是如此。

结论

我们发现使用胎儿头皮电极会增加新生儿发病率,但绝对风险非常低。这些发现可能反映了其使用的潜在指征。我们的研究结果支持在临床需要时使用胎儿头皮电极。

推文摘要

使用胎儿头皮电极相关的新生儿风险较低(头皮损伤 1.2%,头颅血肿 1.0%)。

相似文献

3
Severe maternal and neonatal morbidity after attempted operative vaginal delivery.尝试经阴道分娩后产妇和新生儿出现严重并发症。
Am J Obstet Gynecol MFM. 2021 May;3(3):100339. doi: 10.1016/j.ajogmf.2021.100339. Epub 2021 Feb 23.
8
Short-term maternal and neonatal outcomes by mode of delivery. A case-controlled study.不同分娩方式的短期母婴结局。一项病例对照研究。
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2007 Nov;135(1):35-40. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2006.10.024. Epub 2006 Nov 28.

引用本文的文献

1
Safety of Internal Electronic Fetal Heart Rate Monitoring During Labor.分娩期间内部电子胎儿心率监测的安全性。
Matern Fetal Med. 2022 Mar 10;4(2):121-126. doi: 10.1097/FM9.0000000000000145. eCollection 2022 Apr.
6
Non-invasive Fetal Electrocardiography for Intrapartum Cardiotocography.用于产时胎心监护的无创胎儿心电图
Front Pediatr. 2020 Dec 9;8:599049. doi: 10.3389/fped.2020.599049. eCollection 2020.
7
Use and experiences with external fetal monitoring devices among obstetrical providers.产科医护人员使用及体验外置胎儿监测设备的情况。
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2020 Jul;33(14):2348-2353. doi: 10.1080/14767058.2018.1548604. Epub 2018 Dec 12.

本文引用的文献

1
Births: final data for 2012.出生情况:2012年最终数据。
Natl Vital Stat Rep. 2013 Dec 30;62(9):1-68.
2
The risks and benefits of internal monitors in laboring patients.产妇分娩时使用内部监护仪的风险和益处。
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2013 Jul;209(1):38.e1-6. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2013.04.001. Epub 2013 Apr 2.
5
Contemporary cesarean delivery practice in the United States.当代美国的剖宫产实践。
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2010 Oct;203(4):326.e1-326.e10. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2010.06.058. Epub 2010 Aug 12.
10

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验