Benedetto Chiara, Marozio Luca, Prandi Giovanna, Roccia Ajit, Blefari Silvia, Fabris Claudio
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Torino, Italy.
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2007 Nov;135(1):35-40. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2006.10.024. Epub 2006 Nov 28.
Side-by-side comparisons of short-term maternal and neonatal outcomes for spontaneous vaginal delivery, instrumental vaginal delivery, planned caesarean section and caesarean section during labor in patients matched for clinical condition, age, and week of gestation are lacking. This case-controlled study was undertaken to evaluate short-term maternal and neonatal complications in a healthy population at term by mode of delivery.
Four groups of healthy women, with antenatally normal singleton pregnancies at term, who underwent instrumental vaginal delivery (no. 201), spontaneous delivery (no. 402), planned caesarean section without labor (no. 402) and caesarean section in labor (no. 402) have been retrospectively selected. Outcome measures were maternal and neonatal short-term complications. Odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated.
Maternal complications were mostly associated with forceps-assisted and vacuum-assisted instrumental deliveries (OR: 6.9; 95% CI: 2.9-16.4 and OR 3.0; 95% CI 1.1-8.8, respectively, versus spontaneous deliveries). No significant differences in overall complications were observed between spontaneous vaginal deliveries and caesarean sections, whether planned or in labor. By comparison with caesarean sections in labor, instrumental deliveries significantly increased the risk of complications (OR: 3.2; 95% CI: 1.6-6.5). Neonatal complications were also mostly correlated with forceps-assisted and vacuum-assisted instrumental deliveries (OR: 3.5; 95% CI: 1.9-6.7 and OR 3.8; 95% CI 2.0-7.4, respectively, versus spontaneous deliveries). By comparison with caesarean sections in labor, instrumental vaginal deliveries significantly increased the risk of complications (OR: 4.2; 95% CI: 2.4-7.4).
In healthy women with antenatally normal singleton pregnancies at term, instrumental deliveries are associated with the highest rate of short-term maternal and neonatal complications.
对于临床状况、年龄和孕周相匹配的患者,缺乏对自然阴道分娩、器械助产阴道分娩、择期剖宫产和产时剖宫产的短期母婴结局进行并列比较的研究。本病例对照研究旨在按分娩方式评估足月健康人群的短期母婴并发症。
回顾性选取四组足月单胎妊娠产前正常的健康女性,她们分别接受了器械助产阴道分娩(201例)、自然分娩(402例)、未临产择期剖宫产(402例)和产时剖宫产(402例)。结局指标为母婴短期并发症。计算比值比(OR)和95%置信区间(CI)。
母体并发症大多与产钳助产和真空辅助器械助产分娩有关(与自然分娩相比,OR分别为6.9;95%CI:2.9 - 16.4和OR 3.0;95%CI 1.1 - 8.8)。自然阴道分娩与剖宫产(无论是择期还是产时)在总体并发症方面未观察到显著差异。与产时剖宫产相比,器械助产分娩显著增加了并发症风险(OR:3.2;95%CI:1.6 - 6.5)。新生儿并发症也大多与产钳助产和真空辅助器械助产分娩有关(与自然分娩相比,OR分别为3.5;95%CI:1.9 - 6.7和OR 3.8;95%CI 2.0 - 7.4)。与产时剖宫产相比,器械助产阴道分娩显著增加了并发症风险(OR:4.2;95%CI:2.4 - 7.4)。
在足月单胎妊娠产前正常的健康女性中,器械助产分娩的短期母婴并发症发生率最高。