• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

“与初次心脏再同步治疗(CRT)植入相比,CRT升级程序是否更复杂且并发症更多?”一项单中心经验。

"Are CRT upgrade procedures more complex and associated with more complications than de novo CRT implantations?" A single centre experience.

作者信息

Ter Horst I A H, Kuijpers Y, van 't Sant J, Tuinenburg A E, Cramer M J, Meine M

机构信息

Department of Cardiology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Heidelberglaan 100, PO Box 85500, 3508 GA, Utrecht, The Netherlands.

Facility of Medicine, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Neth Heart J. 2016 Jan;24(1):75-81. doi: 10.1007/s12471-015-0771-9.

DOI:10.1007/s12471-015-0771-9
PMID:26643305
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4692830/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

The objective of the study was to examine whether cardiac resynchronisation therapy upgrade procedures are more complex and associated with more complications than de novo implantations.

METHOD

We retrospectively compared 134 upgrade procedures performed between 2006-2012 with a random, equally sized, sample of de novo CRT device implantations in the same period. Procedural data and the occurrence of periprocedural (≤ 30 days) and long-term device-related (≤ 1 year) complications were analysed. Complications with consequences were defined as those in need of adjustment of standard care.

RESULTS

Median time to upgrade was 57 (31-115) months. There were no significant differences in procedure duration, radiation time or total hospitalisation between upgrades and de novo implantations. Perioperative complications occurred in 6.7 % of upgrade patients and in 9.0 % of de novo patients. The most frequently seen complications were phrenic nerve stimulation, coronary sinus dissection and pocket haematoma. Procedure success was comparable (upgrade: 98.5 % versus de novo: 96.3 %). A total of 236 patients completed 1 year of follow-up. Ten (4.2 %) patients had a long-term device-related complication with consequences including phrenic nerve stimulation, lead dislodgement/dysfunction, and infection (upgrade: 3.5 % versus de novo: 4.9 %).

CONCLUSION

Upgrade procedures are not more complex nor associated with more complications than de novo CRT implantations.

摘要

目的

本研究的目的是检验心脏再同步治疗升级手术是否比初次植入手术更复杂且并发症更多。

方法

我们回顾性比较了2006年至2012年间进行的134例升级手术与同期随机抽取的、数量相等的初次心脏再同步治疗(CRT)设备植入样本。分析了手术数据以及围手术期(≤30天)和长期设备相关(≤1年)并发症的发生情况。有后果的并发症定义为需要调整标准护理的并发症。

结果

升级的中位时间为57(31 - 115)个月。升级手术与初次植入手术在手术持续时间、辐射时间或总住院时间方面无显著差异。6.7%的升级患者和9.0%的初次植入患者发生围手术期并发症。最常见的并发症是膈神经刺激、冠状窦夹层和囊袋血肿。手术成功率相当(升级:98.5% 对初次植入:96.3%)。共有236例患者完成了1年的随访。10例(4.2%)患者出现了有后果的长期设备相关并发症,包括膈神经刺激、导线移位/功能障碍和感染(升级:3.5% 对初次植入:4.9%)。

结论

升级手术并不比初次CRT植入手术更复杂,并发症也不更多。

相似文献

1
"Are CRT upgrade procedures more complex and associated with more complications than de novo CRT implantations?" A single centre experience.“与初次心脏再同步治疗(CRT)植入相比,CRT升级程序是否更复杂且并发症更多?”一项单中心经验。
Neth Heart J. 2016 Jan;24(1):75-81. doi: 10.1007/s12471-015-0771-9.
2
Comparative Analysis of Procedural Outcomes and Complications Between De Novo and Upgraded Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy.初治与升级心脏再同步治疗的手术结果及并发症的对比分析
JACC Clin Electrophysiol. 2021 Jan;7(1):62-72. doi: 10.1016/j.jacep.2020.07.022. Epub 2020 Oct 28.
3
Effects of Upgrade Versus De Novo Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy on Clinical Response and Long-Term Survival: Results from a Multicenter Study.升级与全新心脏再同步治疗对临床反应和长期生存的影响:一项多中心研究的结果
Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol. 2017 Feb;10(2):e004471. doi: 10.1161/CIRCEP.116.004471.
4
Trends and outcomes of cardiac resynchronization therapy upgrade procedures: A comparative analysis using a United States National Database 2003-2013.2003-2013 年美国国家数据库中心脏再同步治疗升级手术的趋势和结局:比较分析。
Heart Rhythm. 2017 Jul;14(7):1043-1050. doi: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2017.02.017. Epub 2017 Feb 16.
5
Complications associated with cardiac resynchronization therapy upgrades versus de novo implantations.心脏再同步治疗升级与初次植入相关的并发症。
Expert Rev Cardiovasc Ther. 2018 Aug;16(8):607-615. doi: 10.1080/14779072.2018.1498783. Epub 2018 Jul 16.
6
Incidence, predictors, and procedural results of upgrade to resynchronization therapy: the RAFT upgrade substudy.升级为心脏再同步化治疗的发生率、预测因素和手术结果:RAFT 升级子研究。
Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol. 2015 Feb;8(1):152-8. doi: 10.1161/CIRCEP.114.001997. Epub 2014 Nov 23.
7
Complications of cardiac resynchronization therapy implantation: De novo implants versus upgrades.心脏再同步治疗植入术的并发症:初次植入与升级植入。
Cardiol J. 2024;31(4):621-627. doi: 10.5603/CJ.a2022.0057. Epub 2022 Jun 28.
8
Success rate of transvenous left ventricular lead implantation for cardiac resynchronisation therapy - recent experience of a single centre.经静脉左心室导线植入治疗心脏再同步化治疗的成功率 - 单中心的近期经验。
Kardiol Pol. 2010 Aug;68(8):903-9.
9
Comparison of versus upgrade cardiac resynchronisation therapy on clinical effect and long-term outcome.比较与升级心脏再同步治疗对临床效果和长期结局的影响。
Acta Cardiol. 2021 Nov;76(9):993-1000. doi: 10.1080/00015385.2020.1867387. Epub 2021 Jan 12.
10
The European Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy Survey: comparison of outcomes between de novo cardiac resynchronization therapy implantations and upgrades.欧洲心脏再同步治疗调查:新发心脏再同步治疗植入与升级之间的结果比较。
Eur J Heart Fail. 2011 Sep;13(9):974-83. doi: 10.1093/eurjhf/hfr085. Epub 2011 Jul 19.

引用本文的文献

1
Upgrading right ventricular pacemakers to biventricular pacing or conduction system pacing: a systematic review and meta-analysis.升级右心室起搏器为双心室起搏或传导系统起搏:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Europace. 2023 Mar 30;25(3):1077-1086. doi: 10.1093/europace/euac188.
2
Complications of cardiac resynchronization therapy implantation: De novo implants versus upgrades.心脏再同步治疗植入术的并发症:初次植入与升级植入。
Cardiol J. 2024;31(4):621-627. doi: 10.5603/CJ.a2022.0057. Epub 2022 Jun 28.
3
The therapeutic effects of upgrade to cardiac resynchronization therapy in pacing-induced cardiomyopathy or chronic right ventricular pacing patients: a meta-analysis.升级为心脏再同步治疗对起搏诱导性心肌病或慢性右心室起搏患者的治疗效果:一项荟萃分析。
Heart Fail Rev. 2022 Mar;27(2):507-516. doi: 10.1007/s10741-021-10091-z. Epub 2021 Feb 27.
4
Mortality and Heart Failure After Upgrade to Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy.升级为心脏再同步治疗后的死亡率和心力衰竭
CJC Open. 2019 Mar 6;1(2):93-99. doi: 10.1016/j.cjco.2019.02.002. eCollection 2019 Mar.
5
Visualisation of coronary venous anatomy by computed tomography angiography prior to cardiac resynchronisation therapy implantation.心脏再同步治疗植入术前通过计算机断层扫描血管造影术对冠状静脉解剖结构进行可视化。
Neth Heart J. 2018 Sep;26(9):433-444. doi: 10.1007/s12471-018-1132-2.
6
De novo implantation vs. upgrade cardiac resynchronization therapy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.全新植入与升级心脏再同步治疗:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Heart Fail Rev. 2018 Jan;23(1):15-26. doi: 10.1007/s10741-017-9652-1.
7
Current aspects of cardiac resynchronisation therapy.心脏再同步治疗的当前进展
Neth Heart J. 2016 Jan;24(1):1-3. doi: 10.1007/s12471-015-0779-1.
8
Upgrading and replacement in CRT devices: experience counts.心脏再同步治疗设备的升级与更换:经验很重要。
Neth Heart J. 2016 Jan;24(1):73-4. doi: 10.1007/s12471-015-0772-8.

本文引用的文献

1
Incidence of lead dislodgement, malfunction and perforation during the first year following device implantation.植入装置后第一年的铅移位、故障和穿孔发生率。
Neth Heart J. 2014 Jun;22(6):286-91. doi: 10.1007/s12471-014-0556-6.
2
Complications after cardiac implantable electronic device implantations: an analysis of a complete, nationwide cohort in Denmark.心脏植入式电子设备植入后的并发症:丹麦全国完整队列分析
Eur Heart J. 2014 May;35(18):1186-94. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/eht511. Epub 2013 Dec 17.
3
2013 ESC Guidelines on cardiac pacing and cardiac resynchronization therapy: the Task Force on cardiac pacing and resynchronization therapy of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC). Developed in collaboration with the European Heart Rhythm Association (EHRA).2013年欧洲心脏病学会(ESC)心脏起搏与心脏再同步治疗指南:欧洲心脏病学会(ESC)心脏起搏与再同步治疗特别工作组。与欧洲心律协会(EHRA)合作制定。
Eur Heart J. 2013 Aug;34(29):2281-329. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/eht150. Epub 2013 Jun 24.
4
Effect of QRS morphology on clinical event reduction with cardiac resynchronization therapy: meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.QRS 形态对心脏再同步治疗临床事件减少的影响:随机对照试验的荟萃分析。
Am Heart J. 2012 Feb;163(2):260-7.e3. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2011.11.014.
5
Rates of upgrade of ICD recipients to CRT in clinical practice and the potential impact of the more liberal use of CRT at initial implant.
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2012 Jan;35(1):73-80. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-8159.2011.03255.x. Epub 2011 Nov 6.
6
The European Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy Survey: comparison of outcomes between de novo cardiac resynchronization therapy implantations and upgrades.欧洲心脏再同步治疗调查:新发心脏再同步治疗植入与升级之间的结果比较。
Eur J Heart Fail. 2011 Sep;13(9):974-83. doi: 10.1093/eurjhf/hfr085. Epub 2011 Jul 19.
7
Effectiveness of Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy by QRS Morphology in the Multicenter Automatic Defibrillator Implantation Trial-Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy (MADIT-CRT).多中心自动除颤器植入试验-心脏再同步治疗(MADIT-CRT)中 QRS 形态对心脏再同步治疗效果的影响。
Circulation. 2011 Mar 15;123(10):1061-72. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.110.960898. Epub 2011 Feb 28.
8
Meta-analysis: cardiac resynchronization therapy for patients with less symptomatic heart failure.荟萃分析:心脏再同步治疗症状较轻心力衰竭患者。
Ann Intern Med. 2011 Mar 15;154(6):401-12. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-154-6-201103150-00313. Epub 2011 Feb 14.
9
Cardiac-resynchronization therapy for mild-to-moderate heart failure.心脏再同步治疗轻中度心力衰竭。
N Engl J Med. 2010 Dec 16;363(25):2385-95. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1009540. Epub 2010 Nov 14.
10
Complication rates associated with pacemaker or implantable cardioverter-defibrillator generator replacements and upgrade procedures: results from the REPLACE registry.与起搏器或植入式心律转复除颤器(ICD)发生器更换和升级手术相关的并发症发生率:REPLACE 注册研究结果。
Circulation. 2010 Oct 19;122(16):1553-61. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.110.976076. Epub 2010 Oct 4.