Suppr超能文献

保乳手术背后的证据是什么?

What is the evidence behind conservative mastectomies?

作者信息

Rocco Nicola, Catanuto Giuseppe, Nava Maurizio Bruno

机构信息

1 Department of Clinical Medicine and Surgery, University of Naples "Federico II", Via S. Pansini 5, 80131 Naples, Italy ; 2 Multidisciplinary Breast Unit, Azienda Ospedaliera Cannizzaro, Via Messina 829, 95126 Catania, Italy ; 3 Scuola di Oncologia Chirurgica Ricostruttiva, Via Besana 4, 20122 Milano, Italy.

出版信息

Gland Surg. 2015 Dec;4(6):506-18. doi: 10.3978/j.issn.2227-684X.2015.04.19.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Besides the diffusion of breast reconstructive techniques, several "conservative" approaches in mastectomy have been developed, in order to perform an immediate reconstruction with better aesthetic results: the skin-sparing mastectomy (SSM), the nipple-areola complex (NAC)-sparing mastectomy (NSM) and the skin-reducing mastectomy (SRM). During the last decade, SSMs and NSMs have gained widespread acceptance and are currently considered standard treatment for early breast cancer. We would like to investigate the evidence behind this radical shift towards conservative mastectomies, where there has been a renewed interest worldwide.

METHODS

We reviewed English literature by consulting the following databases: Medline, Embase, Cochrane Register of Controlled Trials, the World Health Organization (WHO) International Clinical Trials Registry Platform (ICTRP) search portal and Clinicaltrials.gov. The objective is to include any randomized controlled trial (RCT) comparing a "conservative mastectomy" technique to breast conservative surgery or modified radical mastectomy (MRM) for the treatment of early-stage breast cancer. In the absence of randomized trials, we took into account prospective cohorts and retrospective series for a narrative description of available evidence.

RESULTS

Our review included 58 studies [19 prospective cohorts (34%) and 39 retrospective series (66%)] considering NSM and immediate reconstruction and ten studies [1 prospective cohort (10%) and 9 (90%) retrospective series] considering SSM and immediate reconstruction. In the NSM group, 29 studies reported data about complication rates and 42 studies presented data on NAC partial or complete necrosis. In the NSM group 45 studies and all the studies in the SSM group presented data on local and NAC recurrence.

CONCLUSIONS

In order to achieve higher levels of evidence, RCTs comparing conservative mastectomies to traditional mastectomy and breast conservative surgery would be desirable. However we can conclude that conservative mastectomies offer the psychological advantages of good cosmetics and maintenance of woman body image without compromising the oncological safety of mastectomy.

摘要

引言

除了乳房重建技术的推广外,为了实现即时重建并获得更好的美学效果,在乳房切除术中还开发了几种“保守”方法:保留皮肤的乳房切除术(SSM)、保留乳头乳晕复合体(NAC)的乳房切除术(NSM)和皮肤缩减乳房切除术(SRM)。在过去十年中,SSM和NSM已获得广泛认可,目前被视为早期乳腺癌的标准治疗方法。我们希望研究这种向保守乳房切除术的根本性转变背后的证据,全球对此重新产生了兴趣。

方法

我们通过查阅以下数据库回顾英文文献:Medline、Embase、Cochrane对照试验注册库、世界卫生组织(WHO)国际临床试验注册平台(ICTRP)搜索门户和Clinicaltrials.gov。目的是纳入任何比较“保守乳房切除术”技术与乳房保乳手术或改良根治性乳房切除术(MRM)治疗早期乳腺癌的随机对照试验(RCT)。在缺乏随机试验的情况下,我们考虑了前瞻性队列和回顾性系列,以对现有证据进行叙述性描述。

结果

我们的综述纳入了58项研究[19项前瞻性队列研究(34%)和39项回顾性系列研究(66%)],涉及NSM和即时重建,以及10项研究[1项前瞻性队列研究(10%)和9项(90%)回顾性系列研究],涉及SSM和即时重建。在NSM组中,29项研究报告了并发症发生率的数据,42项研究提供了NAC部分或完全坏死的数据。在NSM组中,45项研究以及SSM组中的所有研究都提供了局部和NAC复发的数据。

结论

为了获得更高水平的证据,比较保守乳房切除术与传统乳房切除术和乳房保乳手术的RCT是可取的。然而,我们可以得出结论,保守乳房切除术在不影响乳房切除术肿瘤学安全性的情况下,具有良好美容效果和维护女性身体形象的心理优势。

相似文献

1
What is the evidence behind conservative mastectomies?保乳手术背后的证据是什么?
Gland Surg. 2015 Dec;4(6):506-18. doi: 10.3978/j.issn.2227-684X.2015.04.19.
2
Conservative mastectomies: an overview.保守性乳房切除术:概述
Gland Surg. 2015 Dec;4(6):463-6. doi: 10.3978/j.issn.2227-684X.2015.04.06.
3
Nipple- and areola-sparing mastectomy for the treatment of breast cancer.保留乳头乳晕的乳房切除术治疗乳腺癌。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 Nov 29;11(11):CD008932. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD008932.pub3.

引用本文的文献

本文引用的文献

6
Increasing national mastectomy rates for the treatment of early stage breast cancer.提高全国早期乳腺癌乳房切除术率。
Ann Surg Oncol. 2013 May;20(5):1436-43. doi: 10.1245/s10434-012-2732-5. Epub 2012 Nov 8.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验