Urology Department, Menoufia University, Shibin Al Kom, Egypt.
Urology Department, Farwaniya Hospital, Kuwait City, Kuwait.
Urolithiasis. 2016 Aug;44(4):377-81. doi: 10.1007/s00240-015-0851-8. Epub 2015 Dec 8.
Anterior caliceal stones represent a challenge to endourologist to select the best modality of management with the least morbidity. To study different treatment modalities of management of anterior caliceal stones >15 mm. It is an observational prospective study of patients with anterior caliceal stones more than 15 mm. Inclusion criteria were patients with isolated anterior caliceal stones, or branched anterior caliceal stones with posterior caliceal extension. Patients were evaluated using non-contrast CT preoperatively. They were divided into three groups: group 1 underwent PCNL through posterior caliceal puncture in cases with wide anterior calyx infundibulum or obtuse infundibulopelvic pelvic, group 2 underwent PCNL through anterior caliceal access in cases with narrow infundibulum or acute infundibulopelvic angel and group 3 underwent flexible ureteroscopy and laser lithotripsy. Intraoperative and postoperative findings were recorded and compared. Eighty eight patients were included in this study, Group 1 (44 patients) group 2 (28 patients), and group 3 (16 patients). Operative time was not significantly different across the three groups (68 ± 11.5, 72 ± 9 and 74 ± 11 min in group 1, 2 and 3, respectively, P = 0.053). Fluoroscopy time was significantly shorter for group 3 (2 ± 0.5 m, P = 0.0001) compared to group 1 and 2 (5.6 ± 4.6 and 4.5 ± 1.4 min), respectively. There were no significant differences in stone-free rates after initial treatment between the three groups; 84, 82, and 69 %, in groups 1, 2 and 3, respectively (P = 0.4). Postoperative hemoglobin drop was noted to be highest for group 2 and lowest for group 3 which was significantly different (1.7 ± 0.8, 2.2 ± 1.1, and 0.3 ± 0.3 g/dl, for patients in groups 1, 2 and 3 respectively, P = 0.0001). Group 2 showed the highest post-operative complication rate (21 %) in comparison to group 1 (11 %) and group 3 (6 %), however, differences were not statistically significant (P = 0.3). PCNL through posterior or anterior caliceal puncture is an excellent modality to treat anterior caliceal stones with high stone clearance rate. Despite the higher chance of bleeding with anterior caliceal puncture, it is still inevitably needed in difficult anterior caliceal stones with unfavorable anatomy. RIRS is a good alternative to PCNL with the advantage of less radiation exposure and less bleeding.
前盏结石对腔内泌尿外科医生来说是一个挑战,需要选择一种创伤最小的最佳治疗方法。本研究旨在探讨不同治疗方法在前盏>15mm 结石中的应用。这是一项前瞻性观察性研究,纳入了前盏>15mm 的结石患者。纳入标准为孤立性前盏结石或后盏扩展的分支前盏结石。所有患者术前均行非增强 CT 检查。根据结石位置将患者分为三组:第 1 组通过后盏穿刺行 PCNL,适用于前盏漏斗宽大或漏斗-肾盂角钝角的患者;第 2 组通过前盏入路行 PCNL,适用于漏斗较窄或漏斗-肾盂角锐角的患者;第 3 组采用输尿管软镜联合钬激光碎石术。记录并比较术中及术后情况。本研究共纳入 88 例患者,第 1 组(44 例)、第 2 组(28 例)和第 3 组(16 例)。三组患者的手术时间无显著差异(分别为 68±11.5min、72±9min 和 74±11min,P=0.053)。第 3 组的透视时间明显短于第 1 组和第 2 组(分别为 2±0.5min 和 5.6±4.6min、4.5±1.4min,P=0.0001)。三组患者初始治疗后的结石清除率无显著差异,分别为 84%、82%和 69%(P=0.4)。第 2 组术后血红蛋白下降最明显,第 3 组最低,差异有统计学意义(分别为 1.7±0.8g/dl、2.2±1.1g/dl 和 0.3±0.3g/dl,P=0.0001)。第 2 组术后并发症发生率最高(21%),高于第 1 组(11%)和第 3 组(6%),但差异无统计学意义(P=0.3)。经后盏或前盏穿刺行 PCNL 是治疗前盏结石的有效方法,结石清除率高。虽然经前盏穿刺出血风险较高,但对于解剖结构不利的困难性前盏结石,仍不可避免地需要采用该方法。与 PCNL 相比,输尿管软镜具有辐射暴露少、出血少的优点,是一种较好的替代方法。