Gerstenberg Miriam, Hauser Marta, Al-Jadiri Aseel, Sheridan Eva M, Kishimoto Taishiro, Borenstein Yehonatan, Vernal Ditte L, David Lisa, Saito Ema, Landers Sara E, Carella Morgan, Singh Sukhbir, Carbon Maren, Jiménez-Fernández Sara, Birnbaum Michael L, Auther Andrea, Carrión Ricardo E, Cornblatt Barbara A, Kane John M, Walitza Susanne, Correll Christoph U
University Clinics for Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
J Clin Psychiatry. 2015 Nov;76(11):e1449-58. doi: 10.4088/JCP.14m09435.
DSM-5 conceptualized attenuated psychosis syndrome (APS) as self-contained rather than as a risk syndrome, including it under "Conditions for Further Study," but also as a codable/billable condition in the main section. Since many major mental disorders emerge during adolescence, we assessed the frequency and characteristics of APS in adolescent psychiatric inpatients.
Consecutively recruited adolescents hospitalized for nonpsychotic disorders (September 2009-May 2013) were divided into APS youth versus non-APS youth, based on the Structured Interview of Prodromal Syndromes (SIPS) and according to DSM-5 criteria, and compared across multiple characteristics.
Of 89 adolescents (mean ± SD age = 15.1 ± 1.6 years), 21 (23.6%) had APS. Compared to non-APS, APS was associated with more comorbid disorders (2.7 ± 1.0 vs 2.2 ± 1.3), major depressive disorder (61.9% vs 27.9%), oppositional defiant disorder/conduct disorder (52.4% vs 25.0%), and personality disorder traits (57.1% vs 7.4%, the only diagnostic category surviving Bonferroni correction). APS youth were more severely ill, having higher SIPS total positive, negative, and general symptoms; Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale total and positive scores; depression and global illness ratings; and lower Global Assessment of Functioning (GAF). Conversely, Young Mania Rating Scale scores, suicidal behavior, prescribed psychotropic medications, and mental disorder awareness were similar between APS and non-APS groups. In multivariable analysis, lowest GAF score in the past year (odds ratio [OR] = 51.15; 95% confidence interval [CI], 2.46-2,439.0) and social isolation (OR = 27.52; 95% CI, 3.36-313.87) were independently associated with APS (r(2) = 0.302, P < .0001). Although psychotic disorders were excluded, 65.2% (APS = 57.1%, non-APS = 67.7%, P = .38) received antipsychotics.
One in 4 nonpsychotic adolescent inpatients met DSM-5 criteria for APS. APS youth were more impaired, showing a complex entanglement with a broad range of psychiatric symptoms and disorders, including depression, impulse-control, and, especially, emerging personality disorders.
ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT01383915.
《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》第5版(DSM - 5)将亚临床精神病综合征(APS)概念化为一种独立的综合征,而非风险综合征,将其列入“待进一步研究的病症”,但也作为主要章节中可编码/可计费的病症。鉴于许多主要精神障碍在青少年期出现,我们评估了青少年精神科住院患者中APS的频率和特征。
连续招募因非精神病性障碍住院的青少年(2009年9月至2013年5月),根据前驱症状结构化访谈(SIPS)并依据DSM - 5标准,分为APS青少年组和非APS青少年组,并对多个特征进行比较。
89名青少年(平均年龄±标准差 = 15.1 ± 1.6岁)中,21名(23.6%)患有APS。与非APS组相比,APS组合并更多疾病(2.7 ± 1.0比2.2 ± 1.3)、重度抑郁症(61.9%比27.9%)、对立违抗障碍/品行障碍(52.4%比25.0%)以及人格障碍特质(57.1%比7.4%,唯一经邦费罗尼校正后仍有统计学意义的诊断类别)。APS青少年病情更严重,前驱症状结构化访谈的阳性、阴性和总体症状总分更高;简明精神病评定量表总分及阳性得分更高;抑郁和总体疾病评分更高;而功能总体评定量表(GAF)更低。相反,APS组和非APS组的Young躁狂评定量表得分、自杀行为、处方精神药物以及精神障碍知晓率相似。多变量分析显示,过去一年中最低GAF评分(比值比[OR] = 51.15;95%置信区间[CI],2.46 - 2439.0)和社交孤立(OR = 27.52;95% CI,3.36 - 313.87)与APS独立相关(r(2) = 0.302,P <.0001)。尽管排除了精神病性障碍,但65.2%(APS组 = 57.1%,非APS组 = 67.7%,P =.38)接受了抗精神病药物治疗。
四分之一的非精神病性青少年住院患者符合DSM - 5的APS标准。患有APS的青少年受损更严重,表现出与广泛的精神症状和障碍(包括抑郁、冲动控制,尤其是新发人格障碍)复杂交织。
ClinicalTrials.gov标识符:NCT01383915