• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

自我效能是否介导了医疗保健感知质量与糖尿病自我管理之间的横断面关系?来自澳大利亚糖尿病MILES研究的结果。

Does self-efficacy mediate the cross-sectional relationship between perceived quality of health care and self-management of diabetes? Results from Diabetes MILES - Australia.

作者信息

Tregea Hannah, Lee Christina, Browne Jessica L, Pouwer Frans, Speight Jane

机构信息

a School of Psychology , The University of Queensland , St Lucia , Australia.

b The Australian Centre for Behavioural Research in Diabetes , Melbourne , Australia.

出版信息

Psychol Health. 2016 May;31(5):592-604. doi: 10.1080/08870446.2015.1128543. Epub 2016 Jan 11.

DOI:10.1080/08870446.2015.1128543
PMID:26647643
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Quality of health care (QoC) and self-efficacy may affect self-management of diabetes, but such effects are not well understood. We examined the indirect role of diabetes-specific self-efficacy (DSE) and generalised self-efficacy (GSE) in mediating the cross-sectional relationship between self-reported QoC and diabetes self-management.

DESIGN

Diabetes MILES-Australia was a national survey of 3,338 adults with diabetes. We analysed data from 1,624 respondents (age: M = 52.1, SD = 13.9) with type 1 (T1D; n = 680) or type 2 diabetes (T2D; n = 944), who responded to a version of the survey containing key measures.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

self-reported healthy eating, physical activity, self-monitoring of blood glucose frequency, HbA1c, medication/insulin adherence.

RESULTS

We used Preacher and Hayes' bootstrapping method, controlling for age, gender and diabetes duration, to test mediation of DSE and GSE on the relationship of QoC with each self-management variable. We found statistically significant but trivial mediation effects of DSE and of GSE on most, but not all, variables (all effect sizes < .06).

CONCLUSION

Support for mediation was weak, suggesting that relationships amongst these variables are small and that future research might explore other aspects of self-management in diabetes.

摘要

目的

医疗保健质量(QoC)和自我效能感可能会影响糖尿病的自我管理,但此类影响尚未得到充分理解。我们研究了糖尿病特异性自我效能感(DSE)和一般自我效能感(GSE)在介导自我报告的QoC与糖尿病自我管理之间的横断面关系中的间接作用。

设计

澳大利亚糖尿病MILES研究是一项针对3338名成年糖尿病患者的全国性调查。我们分析了1624名受访者(年龄:M = 52.1,标准差 = 13.9)的数据,这些受访者患有1型糖尿病(T1D;n = 680)或2型糖尿病(T2D;n = 944),他们对包含关键测量指标的调查问卷版本做出了回应。

主要结局指标

自我报告的健康饮食、身体活动、血糖自我监测频率、糖化血红蛋白(HbA1c)、药物/胰岛素依从性。

结果

我们采用Preacher和Hayes的自抽样法,控制年龄、性别和糖尿病病程,以检验DSE和GSE对QoC与各自我管理变量之间关系的中介作用。我们发现,DSE和GSE对大多数(但并非全部)变量具有统计学上显著但微小的中介效应(所有效应量 < 0.06)。

结论

对中介作用的支持较弱,这表明这些变量之间的关系较小,未来的研究可能会探索糖尿病自我管理的其他方面。

相似文献

1
Does self-efficacy mediate the cross-sectional relationship between perceived quality of health care and self-management of diabetes? Results from Diabetes MILES - Australia.自我效能是否介导了医疗保健感知质量与糖尿病自我管理之间的横断面关系?来自澳大利亚糖尿病MILES研究的结果。
Psychol Health. 2016 May;31(5):592-604. doi: 10.1080/08870446.2015.1128543. Epub 2016 Jan 11.
2
The Use of Mobile Applications Among Adults with Type 1 and Type 2 Diabetes: Results from the Second MILES-Australia (MILES-2) Study.1 型和 2 型糖尿病成人使用移动应用程序:来自第二次 MILES-澳大利亚(MILES-2)研究的结果。
Diabetes Technol Ther. 2017 Dec;19(12):730-738. doi: 10.1089/dia.2017.0235. Epub 2017 Oct 13.
3
Social support and self-care outcomes in adults with diabetes: The mediating effects of self-efficacy and diabetes distress. Results of the second diabetes MILES - Australia (MILES-2) study.糖尿病患者的社会支持和自我护理结果:自我效能感和糖尿病困扰的中介作用。第二次糖尿病 MILES - 澳大利亚(MILES-2)研究结果。
Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2020 Aug;166:108314. doi: 10.1016/j.diabres.2020.108314. Epub 2020 Jul 10.
4
Diabetes MILES--Australia (management and impact for long-term empowerment and success): methods and sample characteristics of a national survey of the psychological aspects of living with type 1 or type 2 diabetes in Australian adults.糖尿病 MILES--澳大利亚(长期赋权和成功的管理和影响):一项针对澳大利亚成年人 1 型或 2 型糖尿病患者心理方面的全国性调查的方法和样本特征。
BMC Public Health. 2012 Feb 12;12:120. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-12-120.
5
Diabetes stigma is associated with negative treatment appraisals among adults with insulin-treated Type 2 diabetes: results from the second Diabetes MILES - Australia (MILES-2) survey.糖尿病污名与接受胰岛素治疗的2型糖尿病成人患者对治疗的负面评价相关:澳大利亚糖尿病MILES-2(MILES-2)第二次调查结果
Diabet Med. 2018 May;35(5):658-662. doi: 10.1111/dme.13598. Epub 2018 Mar 13.
6
Negative appraisals of insulin therapy are common among adults with Type 2 diabetes using insulin: Results from Diabetes MILES - Australia cross-sectional survey.在澳大利亚糖尿病MILES横断面调查中,使用胰岛素的2型糖尿病成年人对胰岛素治疗的负面评价很常见。
Diabet Med. 2015 Oct;32(10):1297-303. doi: 10.1111/dme.12729. Epub 2015 Apr 2.
7
Psychosocial Moderators of the Impact of Diabetes Stigma: Results From the Second Diabetes MILES - Australia (MILES-2) Study.糖尿病污名对其影响的心理社会调节因素:来自第二次糖尿病 MILES-澳大利亚研究(MILES-2)的结果。
Diabetes Care. 2020 Nov;43(11):2651-2659. doi: 10.2337/dc19-2447. Epub 2020 Sep 4.
8
Outcome and self-efficacy expectations for medication management of patients with diabetes: influence of the pharmacist-patient relationship.糖尿病患者药物治疗管理的结果与自我效能期望:药师 - 患者关系的影响
J Am Pharm Assoc (2003). 2008 Sep-Oct;48(5):621-31. doi: 10.1331/JAPhA.2008.07090.
9
The Use of Mobile Applications Among Adolescents with Type 1 Diabetes: Results from Diabetes MILES Youth-Australia.青少年 1 型糖尿病患者使用移动应用程序:来自糖尿病 MILES 青年-澳大利亚的结果。
Diabetes Technol Ther. 2016 Dec;18(12):813-819. doi: 10.1089/dia.2016.0233. Epub 2016 Oct 27.
10
Severe obesity and diabetes self-care attitudes, behaviours and burden: implications for weight management from a matched case-controlled study. Results from Diabetes MILES--Australia.重度肥胖与糖尿病自我护理态度、行为及负担:一项配对病例对照研究对体重管理的启示。澳大利亚糖尿病MILES研究结果
Diabet Med. 2014 Feb;31(2):232-40. doi: 10.1111/dme.12306. Epub 2013 Sep 19.

引用本文的文献

1
Individual differences in impulsivity and need for cognition as potential risk or resilience factors of diabetes self-management and glycemic control.冲动性和认知需求个体差异作为糖尿病自我管理和血糖控制的潜在风险或恢复力因素。
PLoS One. 2020 Jan 29;15(1):e0227995. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0227995. eCollection 2020.
2
Exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses and invariance assessment of the perceived powerlessness scale among youth in Baltimore.巴尔的摩青少年感知到的无助感量表的探索性和验证性因素分析及不变性评估。
J Health Psychol. 2020 Sep;25(10-11):1644-1656. doi: 10.1177/1359105318769349. Epub 2018 Apr 11.
3
Cohort profiles of the cross-sectional and prospective participant groups in the second Diabetes MILES-Australia (MILES-2) study.
在第二次糖尿病 MILES-澳大利亚(MILES-2)研究中,横断面和前瞻性参与者组的队列特征。
BMJ Open. 2017 Feb 28;7(2):e012926. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-012926.