Ahmed Imdad, Patel Amisha S, Balgaard Timothy J, Rosenfeld Lynda E
Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut.
Medtronic, plc, Mounds View, Minnesota.
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2016 Mar;39(3):275-81. doi: 10.1111/pace.12798. Epub 2016 Jan 18.
Interrogation/interpretation of cardiac implantable electronic devices (CIEDs) is frequently required in the emergency department (ED) or perioperative areas (OR) where resources to do this are often not available. CareLink Express (CLE; Medtronic, plc, Mounds View, MN, USA) is a technician-supported real-time remote interrogation system for Medtronic CIEDs. Using data from 136 US locations, this retrospective study was designed to assess CLE efficiency compared to traditional device management, and examine its findings.
All 7,044 US CLE transmissions from the ED and OR (January 2012-October 2014) were compared to 217 traditional requests where CIED interrogations/interpretations were performed by calling industry representatives to these sites.
CLE reduced the time to device interrogation/interpretation by 78%: 100 ± 140-22 ± 14 minutes, P < 0.0001, improving response time and consistency; ED: 82 ± 103-23 ± 18 minutes, P, ≤ 0.01; OR: 127 ± 181-17 ± 10 minutes, P < 0.0001. Actionable events (AE) (arrhythmia, device/lead abnormalities) were infrequent: 9.1% overall (ED: 9.9%; OR: 4.1%). Only 6.5% of patients with syncope/presyncope and 13.6% with a perceived shock had AE. AEs were more common in those with suspected device problems (30.4%) or audible alerts (52.6%). They were more likely in patients not enrolled in long-term remote monitoring (23.9% vs 8.2%, P < 0.0001) and in those with older CIED systems (7.4% in year 1 vs 31.0% after 10 years).
The many patients with CIEDs, and the ability to quickly identify the minority with high-risk AE from the no/low-risk majority, strongly support CLE use in the ED and OR, sites which are expensive and prioritize efficiency.
在急诊科(ED)或围手术期区域(手术室),经常需要对植入式心脏电子设备(CIED)进行问询/解读,但这些地方往往没有进行此项操作的资源。CareLink Express(CLE;美敦力公司,美国明尼苏达州芒兹维尤)是一种由技术人员支持的用于美敦力CIED的实时远程问询系统。本回顾性研究利用来自美国136个地点的数据,旨在评估CLE与传统设备管理相比的效率,并检查其结果。
将2012年1月至2014年10月期间来自急诊科和手术室的所有7044次美国CLE传输与217次传统请求进行比较,传统请求是通过致电这些地点的行业代表来进行CIED问询/解读的。
CLE将设备问询/解读时间缩短了78%:从100±140分钟缩短至22±14分钟,P<0.0001,改善了响应时间和一致性;急诊科:从82±103分钟缩短至23±18分钟,P≤0.01;手术室:从127±181分钟缩短至17±10分钟,P<0.0001。可采取行动的事件(AE)(心律失常、设备/导联异常)很少见:总体为9.1%(急诊科:9.9%;手术室:4.1%)。晕厥/先兆晕厥患者中只有6.5%,感觉有电击的患者中只有13.6%有AE。AE在疑似设备问题(30.4%)或有可听警报(52.6%)的患者中更常见。在未参加长期远程监测的患者中更有可能出现AE(23.9%对8.2%,P<0.0001),在使用较旧CIED系统的患者中也更有可能出现AE(第1年为7.4%,10年后为31.0%)。
有许多CIED患者,且能够从无/低风险的大多数患者中快速识别出少数有高风险AE的患者,这有力地支持了在急诊科和手术室使用CLE,这些地方成本高昂且注重效率。