Suppr超能文献

音乐训练能提高读写能力吗?一项元分析。

Does Music Training Enhance Literacy Skills? A Meta-Analysis.

作者信息

Gordon Reyna L, Fehd Hilda M, McCandliss Bruce D

机构信息

Music Cognition Lab, Program for Music, Mind and Society, Department of Otolaryngology, Vanderbilt University Medical Center Nashville, TN, USA ; Vanderbilt Kennedy Center, Vanderbilt University Medical Center Nashville, TN, USA.

Institute for Software Integrated Systems, School of Engineering, Vanderbilt University Nashville, TN, USA.

出版信息

Front Psychol. 2015 Dec 1;6:1777. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01777. eCollection 2015.

Abstract

Children's engagement in music practice is associated with enhancements in literacy-related language skills, as demonstrated by multiple reports of correlation across these two domains. Training studies have tested whether engaging in music training directly transfers benefit to children's literacy skill development. Results of such studies, however, are mixed. Interpretation of these mixed results is made more complex by the fact that a wide range of literacy-related outcome measures are used across these studies. Here, we address these challenges via a meta-analytic approach. A comprehensive literature review of peer-reviewed music training studies was built around key criteria needed to test the direct transfer hypothesis, including: (a) inclusion of music training vs. control groups; (b) inclusion of pre- vs. post-comparison measures, and (c) indication that reading instruction was held constant across groups. Thirteen studies were identified (n = 901). Two classes of outcome measures emerged with sufficient overlap to support meta-analysis: phonological awareness and reading fluency. Hours of training, age, and type of control intervention were examined as potential moderators. Results supported the hypothesis that music training leads to gains in phonological awareness skills. The effect isolated by contrasting gains in music training vs. gains in control was small relative to the large variance in these skills (d = 0.2). Interestingly, analyses revealed that transfer effects for rhyming skills tended to grow stronger with increased hours of training. In contrast, no significant aggregate transfer effect emerged for reading fluency measures, despite some studies reporting large training effects. The potential influence of other study design factors were considered, including intervention design, IQ, and SES. Results are discussed in the context of emerging findings that music training may enhance literacy development via changes in brain mechanisms that support both music and language cognition.

摘要

多项报告表明,儿童参与音乐练习与读写相关语言技能的提升有关。训练研究测试了参与音乐训练是否能直接促进儿童读写技能的发展。然而,这些研究的结果参差不齐。由于这些研究使用了广泛的与读写相关的结果测量方法,对这些混合结果的解释变得更加复杂。在这里,我们通过荟萃分析方法来应对这些挑战。围绕检验直接转移假说所需的关键标准,对同行评审的音乐训练研究进行了全面的文献综述,这些标准包括:(a) 纳入音乐训练组与对照组;(b) 纳入训练前与训练后的比较测量;(c) 表明各小组的阅读教学保持不变。共确定了13项研究(n = 901)。出现了两类结果测量方法,其重叠程度足以支持荟萃分析:语音意识和阅读流畅性。将训练时长、年龄和对照干预类型作为潜在的调节因素进行了检验。结果支持了音乐训练能提高语音意识技能的假说。相对于这些技能的巨大差异,通过对比音乐训练组的进步与对照组的进步所分离出的效果较小(d = 0.2)。有趣的是,分析表明,押韵技能的转移效果往往会随着训练时长的增加而增强。相比之下,尽管一些研究报告了较大的训练效果,但阅读流畅性测量并未出现显著的总体转移效果。还考虑了其他研究设计因素的潜在影响,包括干预设计、智商和社会经济地位。本文将结合最新研究结果进行讨论,这些结果表明音乐训练可能通过支持音乐和语言认知的大脑机制变化来促进读写能力的发展。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0311/4664655/c4ed34fd8e4e/fpsyg-06-01777-g0001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验