Dees Laura, Cooper Patrick K
Herbert and Nicole Wertheim School of Music, Florida International University, Miami, FL, United States.
Front Hum Neurosci. 2025 Jul 23;19:1636278. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2025.1636278. eCollection 2025.
It is hypothesized that increasing literacy skills such as reading rate (fluency) and reading accuracy with children is possible through intentionally developed interventions focused on musical memory, timing, and production (e.g., clapping to a steady beat). Previous studies have found these effects to be significant with third-grade students, an age when school curriculum emphasizes literacy development. Using a quasi-experimental pretest-posttest design, we tested the effects of a musical intervention integrating English Language Arts (ELA) content from the Fundations program on rhythm and literacy skills with third-grade students aged eight to 10 ( = 164). Over 10 weeks, both control and experimental groups attended their regular music class, with the experimental group receiving a higher proportion of class time devoted to building rhythm skills. The most significant training effects were observed in rhythm growth scores: the experimental group showed greater pretest-posttest growth in rhythm skills ( = 0.57, < 0.001). Correlations between rhythm and literacy skills were significant at both pretest-posttest time points ( = 0.20-0.35, < 0.01). However, correlations between growth in rhythm and growth in literacy were not significant. Additionally, no significant differences in literacy growth were found between groups. While these results reinforce the cross-sectional links between rhythm and literacy skills, there was no evidence of transfer from musical growth to literacy growth. These results have practical significance by reporting a lack of training effects despite strong cross-sectional correlations and by discussing methodological considerations for evaluating potential causal effects of music training on academic outcomes.
据推测,通过有意开展专注于音乐记忆、节奏和表现(如跟着稳定节拍拍手)的干预措施,提高儿童的读写技能(如阅读速度(流畅性)和阅读准确性)是可行的。先前的研究发现,这些效果在三年级学生中很显著,这个年龄段的学校课程强调读写能力的发展。我们采用准实验前测-后测设计,测试了一项整合了来自Fundations项目的英语语言艺术(ELA)内容的音乐干预对8至10岁三年级学生(n = 164)节奏和读写技能的影响。在10周的时间里,对照组和实验组都参加常规音乐课,实验组有更高比例的课堂时间用于培养节奏技能。在节奏增长分数方面观察到最显著的训练效果:实验组在节奏技能上的前测-后测增长更大(n = 0.57,p < 0.001)。在前后测两个时间点,节奏和读写技能之间的相关性都很显著(p = 0.20 - 0.35,p < 0.01)。然而,节奏增长与读写增长之间的相关性并不显著。此外,两组在读写增长方面没有发现显著差异。虽然这些结果强化了节奏和读写技能之间的横断面联系,但没有证据表明从音乐增长向读写增长的迁移。这些结果具有实际意义,因为它们报告了尽管横断面相关性很强但缺乏训练效果的情况,并讨论了评估音乐训练对学业成果潜在因果效应的方法学考量。