Nayak R P, Wade A B
J Clin Periodontol. 1977 May;4(2):128-33. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-051x.1977.tb01892.x.
The effectiveness of two agents in plaque removal from the proximal surfaces of teeth was studied in 30 subjects with large interproximal spaces. The Proxabrush was more effective than the rubber cone stimulator in its ability to remove proximal plaque, but neither achieved complete removal. Both agents cleaned incisor teeth better than posterior teeth, mesial surfaces better than distal surfaces, facial halves better than lingual halves and coronal halves better than apical halves of proximal surfaces. No differences in gingival health were detected. A majority of the patients preferred the Proxabrush.
在30名牙间隙较大的受试者中,研究了两种器械清除牙齿邻面菌斑的效果。牙间隙刷在清除邻面菌斑方面比橡胶圆锥刺激器更有效,但两者均未实现完全清除。两种器械清洁切牙的效果均优于后牙,近中面优于远中面,牙面的颊侧半优于舌侧半,邻面的冠方半优于根方半。未检测到牙龈健康方面的差异。大多数患者更喜欢牙间隙刷。