• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

确定创伤性脊髓损伤后确定性治疗和手术减压的途径:一项基于加拿大人群队列研究的结果

Defining the Pathway to Definitive Care and Surgical Decompression after Traumatic Spinal Cord Injury: Results of a Canadian Population-Based Cohort Study.

作者信息

Wilson Jefferson R, Voth Jennifer, Singh Anoushka, Middleton James, Jaglal Susan B, Singh Jeffrey M, Mainprize Todd G, Yee Albert, Fehlings Michael G

机构信息

1 Division of Neurosurgery and Spinal Program, University of Toronto , Toronto, Ontario, Canada .

2 Institute of Clinical Evaluative Sciences, University of Toronto , Toronto, Ontario, Canada .

出版信息

J Neurotrauma. 2016 May 15;33(10):963-71. doi: 10.1089/neu.2015.4258. Epub 2016 Feb 11.

DOI:10.1089/neu.2015.4258
PMID:26652196
Abstract

Early access to specialized care after acute traumatic spinal cord injury (SCI) is associated with improved outcomes. However, many SCI patients do not receive timely access to such care. To characterize and quantify patients' pathway to definitive care and surgery post SCI, and to identify factors that may delay expeditious care, a population based cohort study was performed in Ontario. Using provincial administrative health data, adult patients with acute traumatic SCI who underwent surgery between 2002 and 2011 were identified using SCI specific ICD-10 codes. The relationship between predictor variables and a) time to arrival at the site of definitive care and b) time to surgery was statistically evaluated. Of 1,111 patients meeting eligibility criteria, mean times to arrival at the site of definitive care and to surgery were 8.1 ± 25.5 and 49.4 ± 65.0 hours respectively, with 53.3% of patients having surgery prior to 24 hours. While most patients (88.4%) reached the site of definitive care within 6 hours, only 34.2% reached surgery within 12 hours of arrival. Older age (IRR = 1.01; 95% CI: 1.01, 1.02), increased number of stops at intermediate health care centers (IRR = 7.70; 95% CI: 7.54, 7.86), higher comorbidity index (IRR = 1.43; 95% CI: 1.14, 1.72) and fall related SCI etiology (IRR = 1.16; 95% CI: 1.02, 1.29) were associated with increased time to arrival at definitive care. For surgery, increased age (OR = 1.02; 95% CI: 1.01, 1.03) and stops at intermediate health centers (OR = 2.48; 95% CI: 1.35, 4.56) were associated with a greater odds of undergoing late surgery (>24hrs). These results can inform policy decisions and facilitate creation of a streamlined path to specialized care for patients with acute SCI.

摘要

急性创伤性脊髓损伤(SCI)后尽早获得专科护理与改善预后相关。然而,许多SCI患者未能及时获得此类护理。为了描述和量化SCI患者获得确定性治疗和手术的途径,并确定可能延迟快速治疗的因素,在安大略省进行了一项基于人群的队列研究。利用省级行政卫生数据,通过SCI特定的ICD-10编码识别出2002年至2011年间接受手术的急性创伤性SCI成年患者。对预测变量与a)到达确定性治疗地点的时间和b)手术时间之间的关系进行了统计学评估。在1111名符合资格标准的患者中,到达确定性治疗地点和手术的平均时间分别为8.1±25.5小时和49.4±65.0小时,53.3%的患者在24小时内接受了手术。虽然大多数患者(88.4%)在6小时内到达了确定性治疗地点,但只有34.2%的患者在到达后12小时内接受了手术。年龄较大(风险比[IRR]=1.01;95%置信区间[CI]:1.01,1.02)、在中级医疗中心停留次数增加(IRR=7.70;95%CI:7.54,7.86)、合并症指数较高(IRR=1.43;95%CI:1.14,1.72)以及与跌倒相关的SCI病因(IRR=1.16;95%CI:1.02,1.29)与到达确定性治疗的时间增加相关。对于手术,年龄增加(优势比[OR]=1.02;95%CI:1.01,1.03)和在中级医疗中心停留(OR=2.48;95%CI:1.35,4.56)与接受延迟手术(>24小时)的几率增加相关。这些结果可为政策决策提供参考,并有助于为急性SCI患者创建一条简化的专科护理途径。

相似文献

1
Defining the Pathway to Definitive Care and Surgical Decompression after Traumatic Spinal Cord Injury: Results of a Canadian Population-Based Cohort Study.确定创伤性脊髓损伤后确定性治疗和手术减压的途径:一项基于加拿大人群队列研究的结果
J Neurotrauma. 2016 May 15;33(10):963-71. doi: 10.1089/neu.2015.4258. Epub 2016 Feb 11.
2
Mapping the continuum of care to surgery following traumatic spinal cord injury.
Injury. 2018 Aug;49(8):1552-1557. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2018.06.021. Epub 2018 Jun 18.
3
Complications in acute phase hospitalization of traumatic spinal cord injury: does surgical timing matter?创伤性脊髓损伤急性期住院并发症:手术时机重要吗?
J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2013 Mar;74(3):849-54. doi: 10.1097/TA.0b013e31827e1381.
4
Early versus delayed decompression for traumatic cervical spinal cord injury: results of the Surgical Timing in Acute Spinal Cord Injury Study (STASCIS).创伤性颈脊髓损伤的早期与延迟减压:急性脊髓损伤手术时机研究(STASCIS)的结果。
PLoS One. 2012;7(2):e32037. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0032037. Epub 2012 Feb 23.
5
Is Urgent Decompression Superior to Delayed Surgery for Traumatic Spinal Cord Injury? A Meta-Analysis.对于创伤性脊髓损伤,紧急减压是否优于延迟手术?一项荟萃分析。
World Neurosurg. 2016 Mar;87:124-31. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2015.11.098. Epub 2015 Dec 25.
6
Surgical management of patients following traumatic spinal cord injury: Identifying barriers to early surgery in a specialized spinal cord injury center.创伤性脊髓损伤患者的手术治疗:在专业脊髓损伤中心确定早期手术的障碍
J Spinal Cord Med. 2018 Mar;41(2):142-148. doi: 10.1080/10790268.2016.1165448. Epub 2016 Apr 8.
7
Early versus late surgery for traumatic spinal cord injury: the results of a prospective Canadian cohort study.创伤性脊髓损伤的早期与晚期手术:一项前瞻性加拿大队列研究的结果。
Spinal Cord. 2012 Nov;50(11):840-3. doi: 10.1038/sc.2012.59. Epub 2012 May 8.
8
Early Versus Delayed Surgical Decompression of Spinal Cord after Traumatic Cervical Spinal Cord Injury: A Cost-Utility Analysis.创伤性颈脊髓损伤后早期与延迟脊髓手术减压:成本效用分析
World Neurosurg. 2016 Apr;88:166-174. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2015.12.072. Epub 2016 Jan 7.
9
Do Patients with Complete Spinal Cord Injury Benefit from Early Surgical Decompression? Analysis of Neurological Improvement in a Prospective Cohort Study.完全性脊髓损伤患者能从早期手术减压中获益吗?一项前瞻性队列研究中的神经功能改善分析。
J Neurotrauma. 2016 Feb 1;33(3):301-6. doi: 10.1089/neu.2015.3957. Epub 2016 Jan 7.
10
Process benchmarking appraisal of surgical decompression of spinal cord following traumatic cervical spinal cord injury: opportunities to reduce delays in surgical management.创伤性颈脊髓损伤后路脊髓减压手术的流程基准评估:减少手术管理延误的机会。
J Neurotrauma. 2013 Mar 15;30(6):487-91. doi: 10.1089/neu.2012.2539. Epub 2013 Mar 20.

引用本文的文献

1
Anterior cervical discectomy and fusion for subaxial cervical spine injuries; management challenges and early outcome in a neurosurgical center.颈椎前路椎间盘切除融合术治疗下颈椎损伤;神经外科中心的管理挑战与早期疗效
Surg Neurol Int. 2025 Jan 24;16:17. doi: 10.25259/SNI_667_2024. eCollection 2025.
2
An Update of a Clinical Practice Guideline for the Management of Patients With Acute Spinal Cord Injury: Recommendations on the Role and Timing of Decompressive Surgery.急性脊髓损伤患者管理临床实践指南更新:关于减压手术的作用及时机的建议
Global Spine J. 2024 Mar;14(3_suppl):174S-186S. doi: 10.1177/21925682231181883.
3
Epidemiology features of traumatic and non-traumatic spinal cord injury in China, Wuhan.
中国武汉外伤性和非外伤性脊髓损伤的流行病学特征。
Sci Rep. 2024 Jan 18;14(1):1640. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-52210-4.
4
Time is spine: What's over the horizon.时间就是脊梁:即将发生什么。
J Clin Orthop Trauma. 2022 Oct 22;35:102043. doi: 10.1016/j.jcot.2022.102043. eCollection 2022 Dec.
5
Pursuing More Aggressive Timelines in the Surgical Treatment of Traumatic Spinal Cord Injury (TSCI): A Retrospective Cohort Study with Subgroup Analysis.在创伤性脊髓损伤(TSCI)手术治疗中追求更积极的时间线:一项带有亚组分析的回顾性队列研究。
J Clin Med. 2021 Dec 20;10(24):5977. doi: 10.3390/jcm10245977.
6
Early Surgery for Traumatic Spinal Cord Injury: Where Are We Now?创伤性脊髓损伤的早期手术治疗:我们目前的进展如何?
Global Spine J. 2020 Jan;10(1 Suppl):84S-91S. doi: 10.1177/2192568219877860. Epub 2020 Jan 6.
7
Clinical Characteristics and Challenges of Management of Traumatic Spinal Cord Injury in a Trauma Center of a Developing Country.发展中国家一家创伤中心创伤性脊髓损伤的临床特征与管理挑战
J Neurosci Rural Pract. 2019 Jul;10(3):393-399. doi: 10.1055/s-0039-1695696. Epub 2019 Oct 7.
8
Assessment and management of acute spinal cord injury: From point of injury to rehabilitation.急性脊髓损伤的评估与管理:从损伤点到康复
J Spinal Cord Med. 2017 Nov;40(6):665-675. doi: 10.1080/10790268.2017.1329076. Epub 2017 Jun 1.
9
Geomapping of Traumatic Spinal Cord Injury in Canada and Factors Related to Triage Pattern.加拿大创伤性脊髓损伤的地理定位及与分诊模式相关的因素
J Neurotrauma. 2017 Oct 15;34(20):2856-2866. doi: 10.1089/neu.2016.4929. Epub 2017 Apr 26.
10
Improving care standards for patients with spinal trauma combining a modified e-Delphi process and stakeholder interviews: a study protocol.结合改良的电子德尔菲法和利益相关者访谈提高脊柱创伤患者的护理标准:一项研究方案
BMJ Open. 2017 Jan 19;7(1):e012377. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-012377.