自我效能感介导中风后平衡/行走能力、活动和参与之间的关系。
Self-efficacy Mediates the Relationship between Balance/Walking Performance, Activity, and Participation after Stroke.
作者信息
French Margaret A, Moore Meghan F, Pohlig Ryan, Reisman Darcy
机构信息
a Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation , The Johns Hopkins Hospital , Baltimore , MD , USA.
b Department of Physical Therapy , University of Delaware , Newark , DE , USA.
出版信息
Top Stroke Rehabil. 2016 Apr;23(2):77-83. doi: 10.1080/10749357.2015.1110306. Epub 2015 Dec 10.
BACKGROUND
Many outcome measures (OM) that assess individuals' ability or beliefs in their ability to perform tasks exist to evaluate activity and participation after stroke; however, the relationship between various OM and activity/participation is unclear.
OBJECTIVE
The purpose of this study was to explore the relationships between different OM and activity and participation in people after stroke.
METHODS
Fifty-nine subjects post stroke participated in an assessment including self-selected walking speed, 6 minute walk test, Timed "Up and Go" test, Berg Balance Scale, Functional Gait Assessment, Walk 12, and Activity-specific Balance Confidence Scale. Step Watch Activity Monitoring (SAM) was used as a measure of activity and Stroke Impact Scale-Participation (SIS-P) as a measure of participation. Exploratory Factor Analysis was performed including all measures except SAM and SIS-P. Two factors were extracted and termed performance based (PB) and self-efficacy (SE). A path analysis assessed the role of SE as a mediator in the relationships of PB and SAM/SIS-P.
RESULTS
In the path analysis, PB significantly predicts SE (p < 0.001, b = 0.44), but not SAM or SIS-P (p > 0.05, b = 0.25, and b = 0.11, respectively). SE significantly predicts both SAM and SIS-P (p < 0.001, b = 0.46, and b = 0.59, respectively). The indirect effects of PB on SAM and SIS-P were significant (p < 0.001; b = 0.20, and b = 0.26, respectively).
CONCLUSION
These results suggest that SE mediates the relationship between PB and activity and participation after stroke, reinforcing that improving activity and participation is more complicated than only targeting performance. Clinicians should administer SE and PB measures to determine the most accurate view of patients after stroke and seek to improve SE through interventions.
背景
存在许多评估个体执行任务能力或对自身执行任务能力信念的结局指标(OM),用于评估中风后的活动和参与情况;然而,各种OM与活动/参与之间的关系尚不清楚。
目的
本研究旨在探讨中风患者中不同OM与活动和参与之间的关系。
方法
59名中风后受试者参与了一项评估,包括自选步行速度、6分钟步行测试、定时起立行走测试、伯格平衡量表、功能性步态评估、步行12测试以及特定活动平衡信心量表。使用步数监测活动监测仪(SAM)作为活动指标,中风影响量表-参与部分(SIS-P)作为参与指标。进行探索性因素分析,纳入除SAM和SIS-P之外的所有指标。提取了两个因素,分别称为基于表现(PB)和自我效能感(SE)。进行路径分析以评估SE在PB与SAM/SIS-P关系中作为中介的作用。
结果
在路径分析中,PB显著预测SE(p < 0.001,b = 0.44),但不显著预测SAM或SIS-P(p > 0.05,b分别为0.25和0.11)。SE显著预测SAM和SIS-P(p均< 0.001,b分别为0.46和0.59)。PB对SAM和SIS-P的间接效应显著(p < 0.001;b分别为0.20和0.26)。
结论
这些结果表明,SE介导了中风后PB与活动和参与之间的关系,强化了改善活动和参与比仅针对表现更为复杂的观点。临床医生应采用SE和PB测量方法来确定中风后患者的最准确情况,并通过干预措施寻求提高SE。