Suppr超能文献

在低速停车操作期间,使用倒车摄像头、停车传感器系统、两种技术或不使用任何技术的驾驶员之间的扫视行为差异。

Differences in glance behavior between drivers using a rearview camera, parking sensor system, both technologies, or no technology during low-speed parking maneuvers.

作者信息

Kidd David G, McCartt Anne T

机构信息

Insurance Institute for Highway Safety, 1005 North Glebe Road, Arlington, VA 22201, United States.

Insurance Institute for Highway Safety, 1005 North Glebe Road, Arlington, VA 22201, United States.

出版信息

Accid Anal Prev. 2016 Feb;87:92-101. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2015.11.030. Epub 2015 Dec 4.

Abstract

This study characterized the use of various fields of view during low-speed parking maneuvers by drivers with a rearview camera, a sensor system, a camera and sensor system combined, or neither technology. Participants performed four different low-speed parking maneuvers five times. Glances to different fields of view the second time through the four maneuvers were coded along with the glance locations at the onset of the audible warning from the sensor system and immediately after the warning for participants in the sensor and camera-plus-sensor conditions. Overall, the results suggest that information from cameras and/or sensor systems is used in place of mirrors and shoulder glances. Participants with a camera, sensor system, or both technologies looked over their shoulders significantly less than participants without technology. Participants with cameras (camera and camera-plus-sensor conditions) used their mirrors significantly less compared with participants without cameras (no-technology and sensor conditions). Participants in the camera-plus-sensor condition looked at the center console/camera display for a smaller percentage of the time during the low-speed maneuvers than participants in the camera condition and glanced more frequently to the center console/camera display immediately after the warning from the sensor system compared with the frequency of glances to this location at warning onset. Although this increase was not statistically significant, the pattern suggests that participants in the camera-plus-sensor condition may have used the warning as a cue to look at the camera display. The observed differences in glance behavior between study groups were illustrated by relating it to the visibility of a 12-15-month-old child-size object. These findings provide evidence that drivers adapt their glance behavior during low-speed parking maneuvers following extended use of rearview cameras and parking sensors, and suggest that other technologies which augment the driving task may do the same.

摘要

本研究对使用倒车摄像头、传感器系统、摄像头与传感器系统组合或未使用任何技术的驾驶员在低速停车操作期间对不同视野的使用情况进行了特征描述。参与者对四种不同的低速停车操作各进行了五次。在传感器和摄像头加传感器条件下,对参与者在四次操作中第二次经过不同视野的扫视进行了编码,并记录了传感器系统发出听觉警告时以及警告刚发出后扫视的位置。总体而言,结果表明摄像头和/或传感器系统的信息被用于替代后视镜和肩部扫视。使用摄像头、传感器系统或两种技术的参与者回头看的次数明显少于未使用技术的参与者。与没有摄像头的参与者(无技术和传感器条件)相比,有摄像头的参与者(摄像头和摄像头加传感器条件)使用后视镜的次数明显更少。与摄像头条件下的参与者相比,摄像头加传感器条件下的参与者在低速操作期间看中控台/摄像头显示屏的时间占比更小,并且与警告开始时扫视该位置的频率相比,在传感器系统发出警告后,他们更频繁地扫视中控台/摄像头显示屏。尽管这种增加在统计学上不显著,但这种模式表明摄像头加传感器条件下的参与者可能将警告作为查看摄像头显示屏的提示。通过将研究组之间观察到的扫视行为差异与一个12至15个月大儿童尺寸物体的可见性相关联,对这些差异进行了说明。这些发现提供了证据,表明驾驶员在长期使用倒车摄像头和停车传感器后,在低速停车操作期间会调整他们的扫视行为,并表明其他增强驾驶任务的技术可能也会有同样的效果。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验